Kojin SL Exhibition

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от Seriy

Congratulations! First , the defendant has already been punished financially and acknowledged his fault proof. Now, to get the money needed to file a new suit or something or make further claim at trial , alas, I do not know if it is possible to appeal .

In court, everything looks different than the solution. In istsa and defendant literally the "spark of the arm was ." The judge even called party to order. Otvechik primyanul not walk on the creativity of your humble servant. More precisely on the "cost of painting ," about the famous artist said that the artist may be known , but poor. >

[kozhinart]

The trial court did not satisfy this requirement because of the lack of evidence of the compensation , pointing out the existence of irregularities in the operations of the company JSC " Media Park " published by the magazine " TV Park ." The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the court in force, but to meet the requirements refused , saying other factors: the absence of fault on the part of the defendant. In the court of appeal lawyers have made a complete withdrawal of conflicting court decisions , and the case was sent for retrial. The appeal court pointed out that the proof of a violation of copyright court can not deny a claim based on the absence of proof of the amount of compensation , because " as the perpetrator of law must be brought to justice in accordance with the law and violated the right to be compensated , and the protection of violated right is the task of the judiciary. "

PS: Since April 2013 , " TV Park " ceased production of the magazine, according to the head needs re-branding ...
Source : http://izvestia.ru/news/547692

[zarajara]

I have all 8 pages of threads did not read, may I repeat what has been said.
It seems to me that there is not so clear, and this court can serve as a very nasty precedent that ultimately harm the artists.
Let's art critic writes hard-hitting article about the work of a painter. It turns out that in order to newspaper published pictures, referred to in the article, should be appropriate copyright permission. This publication does not receive permission ever.
So the artists can now be "either good or nothing."
I do not know how in Russia, and we have artists ever to claim to the art critics: "Why do not you write about us." Now they have something to say.
And if the artist does want to write about it, let him pay and the writing and publication, and the publication will appear with the stamp "for publicity."
That is the practice of suing in the end lead to the artists that no self-respecting art critic to write anything at all will not. A publication will publish only those whose copyright has expired. And someone from this will be good?
I am writing the last two years by sooo "big holidays," and now I understand that we should stop altogether.

P.S. kozhinart, are abstract arguments on lawsuits about publications. . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от zarajara

I'm all 8 pages of threads did not read, may I repeat what has been said.
It seems to me that there is not so clear, and this court can serve as a very nasty precedent that ultimately harm the artists.
Let's art critic writes hard-hitting article about the work of a painter. It turns out that in order to newspaper published pictures, referred to in the article, should be appropriate copyright permission. This publication does not receive permission ever.
So the artists can now be "either good or nothing."
I do not know how in Russia, and we have artists ever to claim to the art critics: "Why do not you write about us." Now they have something to say.
And if the artist does want to write about it, let him pay and the writing and publication, and the publication will appear with the stamp "for publicity."
That is the practice of suing in the end lead to the artists that no self-respecting art critic to write anything at all will not. A publication will publish only those whose copyright has expired. And someone from this will be good?
I am writing the last two years by sooo "big holidays," and now I understand that we should stop altogether.

P.S. kozhinart, are abstract arguments on lawsuits about publications. . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

And about the artists and write, as you say, basically only when they pay for it, and should be the other way, the artists - have to pay for the intellectual property, they did their job and should receive compensation for their work. Critical articles on artists can not illustrate. Or illustrate other material. To the west is a long time practice of the waste, there is the artist receives royalties from the circulation, and we often do not.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от kozhinart

And about the artists and write, as you say, basically only when they pay for it, and should be the other way , the artists - have to pay for the intellectual property , they did their job and should receive for their work reward. Critical articles on artists can not illustrate . Or illustrate other material . To the west is a long time practice of the waste , there is the artist receives royalties from the circulation, and we often do not .

Because fewer articles that I would like to read it.
Proplachennaya artist laudatory article - it's rubbish.

[artcol]

Сообщение от zarajara

I'm all 8 pages of threads did not read, may I repeat what has been said .
It seems to me that there is not so clear , and this court can serve as a very nasty precedent that ultimately harm the artists.
Let's art critic writes hard-hitting article about the work of a painter . It turns out that in order to newspaper published pictures, referred to in the article, should be appropriate copyright permission . This publication does not receive permission ever.
So the artists can now be " either good or nothing."
I do not know how in Russia , and we have artists ever to claim to the art critics : " Why do not you write about us ." Now they have something to say.
And if the artist does want to write about it , let him pay and the writing and publication , and the publication will appear with the stamp "for publicity ."
That is the practice of suing in the end lead to the artists that no self-respecting art critic to write anything at all will not. A publication will publish only those whose copyright has expired. And someone from this will be good ?
I am writing the last two years by sooo " big holidays ," and now I understand that we should stop altogether.

P.S. kozhinart, are abstract arguments on lawsuits about publications . . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

This problem is solved prsoto : Critic takes permission to publish the artist in writing even before you start your job.

[kozhinart]

Сообщение от artcol

This problem is solved prsoto: Critic takes permission to publish the artist in writing even before you start your work.

A good recommendation, and the artist, and even a critical article may not mind, and give permission.

[artcol]

Сообщение от kozhinart

A good recommendation , and the artist , and even a critical article may not mind , and to give permission .

In addition , I am even in the case of articles criticizing the order , a reservation - all up to you , but would agree on the harmonization tekstamateriala before printing.

for a rise, even in such a way ( with the risk , as BE ) - always better . IMHO .

[zarajara]

Сообщение от artcol

Also , I'm even in the case of articles criticizing the order , a reservation - all up to you , but would agree on the harmonization tekstamateriala before printing.

This agreement - is censorship . The situation is different if the interview.
However , as is usually written articles for the catalog.
Generally I do not order the artist had in mind , and art.kritikom exercise of their professional duties. It does not involve censorship on the part of the artist and it is in conflict with the copyright of the artist. Because even at the mention of the name can theoretically be entitled to use the brand as a . So you can go far .
Let's go solo exhibition, in principle, an art historian can write about this show is not even dealing with the artist ( I had so often done , and now it turned out that most of the artists I know) . Previously, it was simple, it was possible to take pictures of the exhibition put in the article, but now it turns out - no .
Frankly , I do not themselves mean. I have no such problems never was and never will be, it abstract reasoning. On the other hand, everything comes to an end , may profession criticism is no longer needed . It is increasingly replacing PR .

[artcol]

Сообщение от zarajara

This agreement - is censorship.
The situation is different if the interview.

I agree.
Then the first option.

Сообщение от zarajara

It is increasingly replacing PR.

This is a problem.