Talk "for life"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed

I once saw a sign-trust Putin, higher than the church.

I once watched the election results in Russia - for Putin 146%.

[Fed]

Сообщение от artcol

Besides our current opposition - it's previous government formation.
The range of power.
The nomenclature of the opposition.

All of her questions - about the privatized property.

Udaltsov, Navalny?

Lemons?

A Ryzhkov? - Participated only in elected bodies.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed

Limonov?

Lemons all sold grandfather.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от Fed

Udaltsov , Navalny ?
Lemons ?

Lemons are not in this series.
Udaltsov certainly engaged by the previous formation. Actually, such as Udaltsov in a normal society should be declared insane and nerukopozhatymi .
Navalny - yes. But he just sign. Faith .

Actually, I already like 10 years do not rate for staff. There are political issues and ideology, but there is technology - and the question refers to the last person . But for the people all the modern course not.

[Fed]

Сообщение от artcol; 2647011"

Limonov is not in this series.

http://limonov-eduard.livejournal.com/
Lemons: "At one time there was a code of the builder of communism in the Soviet times.
Now, there is a code of liberala.Ochen important shrine simple, God forbid him to break.

The program "Minority Report" radio station "Echo of Moscow", last week I was asked how I feel about the dismissal of Marat Gelman as director of the Museum of Modern Art in the city of Perm.
I said that I probably can not be a director of the museum for life, which was replaced by the governor of the Perm region, the former patron of Gelman, but this is not. Well fired and fired. I have not won since January column in GQ, and for nine years has been, and that's okay, nothing ....
From the tone of the leader, according to her facial grimaces, I realized that violated the Code, committed sacrilege. Gelman in the code included among liberal shrines, if you are on Gelman is currently allowed, Limonov, you sided with Putin, you're just the last bastard and an accomplice of the regime.

Yesterday I wrote a post about Lowe Ponomarev, proargumentirovav his dislike for him.
Today I read this comment, among others: "Guess with three times on which side in the conflict has become Limonov Lev Ponomarev with Putin?"

A What! Turns out there is a conflict Ponomariov with Putin.
Crystal clear Ponomareff conflicts with crystal dirty Putin warmly as conflict, with over 15 years of age. concessional office in the center of Moscow, and sitting with in all sorts of boards and wards together with the government.

While the NBP hands dragged by the feet of offices as Chechen prisoners, and the last office burned, set on fire because the metal door, opened grinder. And once our office gas allowed.
Lev Ponomarev, a true beast, and not man, was the initiator of the adoption of Article 282, in which the judge and the judge nonstop NBP and nationalists, the government is happy to have an article against extremism, which Lev authorities gave, and he turns out to be a conflict with Putin and?
 And of course, with three times who will not guess at what Stronie Limonov, with disgust relating to the identity Lev Ponomarev.

Code of liberal, it's something.
You tell them that Pussy riot-, nasty girls who wanted to become famous cheap - you're on the side of Putin, man!

You are strongly opposed to the adoption of Russian children by foreigners - Three guesses which side you!

You wear out conversations progressive public about same-sex marriage, you're through clenched teeth that this is a little too, well, a chur, Three guesses on whose side you're on!

Guys, you are twisting in a whirlwind of debris, dirt and confusion!
Intoxicated by foreign modernity, do you think the destruction of morality forefathers committed.
Do not implicate Putin to prove his non-existent right.
Peeled himself from Putin.

His main sin against Russia, consists in the fact that he destroyed the ability to change the government through elections, he destroyed the free election and made it impossible to oppositional politics. He has other sins.

But his sins will not give you for your indulgence.

It was a Sunday sermon June 23, 2013. "

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed; 2646941"

And about the attitude to the opposition of the Russian Federation is not a secret at all, even their own.
More than half of them do not about know-approve 7 percent.

Listen to me. These same or nearly the same people three years ago tell us about upgrading and about Skolkovo. They are the same or approximately the same, they talked about the national projects of doubling GDP and God knows what else, what we do, and how many years they been forgotten. From time to time change the face. Yesterday was Zhelezniak, Mizulina today, tomorrow, this will be the Stavropol presenter with huge lips, whose name we do not remember, but soon must remember and become hotly prove to each other that she is wrong. As if the people who say it is written by someone for them, may be right or wrong.
We co-exist with these people for many years, we had already learned that the words of these people do not mean anything, and that these people say exactly what the administration tells them to the president. Recently I wrote that easily imagine how the son of the deputy Mizulina becomes the deputy in Russia and legalize gay marriage. I corrected some of the readers - they say, is not the son, and she Mizulina and legalize. Yes, that's precisely - it is itself, it is even easier because it is already the deputy.
The same, incidentally, applies to the polls. Just Mizulina put the figure - 88 percent of Russians, it turns out, the next support arhaizatorsky law. And, of course, aah - 88 per cent, as it is awful, Germany thirties, horrible people, and so on. It is, I believe, to seek out the survey in 2007 or 2009 and see what was the percentage of those who approve or modernization priority national projects - we can assume that the questions of previous years responded positively literally the same people today who disapprove antigeysky law, and that tomorrow (that's so what can not doubt) just unanimously support the legalization of gay marriage. You could even say that the higher the percentage of citizens who are not looking to support any initiative of the authorities, the calmer society will accept any revolution, a strong passive majority - the surest guarantee of future change. It is these ever-loyal people will say its say "yes" to anyone who will succeed Putin. This is 88 percent of hope. The more people in the country who are always and for any reason they say "yes", the less you need people on the square.

***
 <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от Fed

http://limonov-eduard.livejournal.com/
Lemons: "At one time there was a code of the builder of communism in the Soviet times.
Now, there is a code of liberala.Ochen important shrine simple, God forbid him to break.

The program "Minority Report" radio station "Echo of Moscow", last week I was asked how I feel about the dismissal of Marat Gelman as director of the Museum of Modern Art in the city of Perm.
I said that I probably can not be a director of the museum for life, which was replaced by the governor of the Perm region, the former patron of Gelman, but this is not. Well fired and fired. I have not won since January column in GQ, and for nine years has been, and that's okay, nothing ....
From the tone of the leader, according to her facial grimaces, I realized that violated the Code, committed sacrilege. Gelman in the code included among liberal shrines, if you are on Gelman is currently allowed, Limonov, you sided with Putin, you're just the last bastard and an accomplice of the regime.

Yesterday I wrote a post about Lowe Ponomarev, proargumentirovav his dislike for him.
Today I read this comment, among others: "Guess with three times on which side in the conflict has become Limonov Lev Ponomarev with Putin?"

A What! Turns out there is a conflict Ponomariov with Putin.
Crystal clear Ponomareff conflicts with crystal dirty Putin warmly as conflict, with over 15 years of age. concessional office in the center of Moscow, and sitting with in all sorts of boards and wards together with the government.

While the NBP hands dragged by the feet of offices as Chechen prisoners, and the last office burned, set on fire because the metal door, opened grinder. And once our office gas allowed.
Lev Ponomarev, a true beast, and not man, was the initiator of the adoption of Article 282, in which the judge and the judge nonstop NBP and nationalists, the government is happy to have an article against extremism, which Lev authorities gave, and he turns out to be a conflict with Putin and?
 And of course, with three times who will not guess at what Stronie Limonov, with disgust relating to the identity Lev Ponomarev.

Code of liberal, it's something.
You tell them that Pussy riot-, nasty girls who wanted to become famous cheap - you're on the side of Putin, man!

You are strongly opposed to the adoption of Russian children by foreigners - Three guesses which side you!

You wear out conversations progressive public about same-sex marriage, you're through clenched teeth that this is a little too, well, a chur, Three guesses on whose side you're on!

Guys, you are twisting in a whirlwind of debris, dirt and confusion!
Intoxicated by foreign modernity, do you think the destruction of morality forefathers committed.
Do not implicate Putin to prove his non-existent right.
Peeled himself from Putin.

His main sin against Russia, consists in the fact that he destroyed the ability to change the government through elections, he destroyed the free election and made it impossible to oppositional politics. He has other sins.

But his sins will not give you for your indulgence.

It was a Sunday sermon June 23, 2013. "

Good text.
In fact, with the right to Limonov (in my opinion ideology - right), prevented leaderism operetta sense. Apparently he got rid of him, pomudrel what? Well, thank God.

A person do not solve. The crowd was all sorts, speakers with beautiful plumage. Solves the intelligence, knowledge, technology, will, in the end, all, self-confidence, and his right.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

***
 <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

But it zhurnalizd wrote immediately obvious, "just", "same", "by the way", "suggests", "You can even say" ... Well, at the end of the thesis <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

By the way, "manipulation" - is the word "Manipur".

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fed; 2647031"

Lemons

Limonov The problem, in general, is understandable. It is clear that brought him to the columnists of the so-called "newspaper", "Izvestia".
The problem is that Lemons had never engaged in politics.
Politics - it's claim to power.
Lemons - a talented writer, tried to turn the absence of a Russian policy in the field to risky performances. Inadequate brutality of the state in response to complete the look. Saturate the artist's life with meaning.

"The big black cars speeding down the streets of the city. They - the members of the Party and the most beautiful woman. Heroes are ready to kill and die" - I quote the old "Limonka" from memory, but it seems close to the text. Perhaps it is a claim to power. The claim to power over the minds of boys with complexes. But not politics.

From the point of view of ordinary people, Lemons Framed those boys who have served neillyuzorno time. From the point of view of literature - gave them a destiny, entered them into the text. The writer is no gift more. But where is the policy?

By the way, the causes of this violence deserve a separate discussion, but we're here about Limonov, not about the state. In my opinion, the state only once found the strength to respond sensibly Limonov - when one of the actions of "Strategy 31" razhie policemen carried kicking leader with an unsanctioned rally in the paddock, where a rally sanctioned.

And then all of a sudden the situation changed. If the policy is not revived, the galvanize. There are people who can make a claim to power. They do this stupid, clumsy, funny - it does not matter. But they consume space in which politics supplanted risky artistic gesture. Well, that's not living the two genres together. Where possible one - there is no other.

Limonov world is drowning. Naturally, he is furious. Such policies are not interested in him, he is not about that. He - beautiful words about leading, if necessary, to deliberately pointless death of the hero, and not about boring things.

All of his texts in the so-called "Paper" and not just in it now - it's open letter to the state. Return - requires great Russian writer - give me back my world without politics, in which I will suffer beautifully, turning the area into a theatrical stage, where possible answer - the enthusiasm or hatred, but not "substantive discussion"!

Where do poet, and where a "substantive discussion"? Are you talking about.

He had to go to the Kremlin, and that the leader of the front, and the flame of the eye, and all die, and that girls were crying after reading visy, said the dying heroes. And if not gone - and so you nerds, here's to you!

Nothing else in the sufferings of Werther neyunogo not. And no policy at all never happened.

***
 <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Добавлено через 17 минут

Сообщение от artcol

By the way, "manipulation" - is the word "Manipur".

Oh, one more " magnolia in the hole ".
<! - ~ 5 ~ ->


Manipulation from the French.
manipulation, from the Latin.
manipulus - a handful, a handful, manus - hand.


Manus manum lavat. (c) <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

By the way, "manipulation" - is the word "Manipur".

Oh, one more " magnolia in the hole ".
<! - ~ 5 ~ ->


Manipulation from the French.
manipulation, from the Latin.
manipulus - a handful, a handful, manus - hand.


Manus manum lavat. (c) <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Fed]

The manifesto, voiced opposition to the rally - it's just a bunch of words devoid of any meaning, says Radzikhovsky:
"Initial phrase manifesto sets the tone for this document," Putin must go ". It remains to find out who he should, and who is with him, this duty requires. Which fininspektor with him this debt will require. This is - a meaningless, pathetic, absolutely ridiculous document banal in content "

"People do not vote for their idiotic documents and not for Nemtsov Navalny, a vote against the ruling party. Dissatisfaction with government is not going anywhere. And the size of this discontent - is the main and only important question that I can not answer "
"The leaders of the opposition, as expected, were absolute cowards, and that was brilliantly demonstrated. Because on the day of the meeting, these ardent revolutionaries dutifully crawled to the Investigation Committee, instead of going to meetings, but one Udaltsov. "

"Over the past two months, they have shown themselves completely worthless, good-for-nothing organized, amazingly weak politicians, no PR-schikami, in general - have failed on all counts.
However, as the new leaders did not raise any of that means that we have all the capacity for self-organization, including self-organization here is that the creative class is simply set to zero. If former leaders are helpless, talentless, stupid - push new leaders! That did not happen. Emptiness. "