Question?

[SAH]

Сообщение от artcol

By the way, to a certain page topic fascinated me with his consistency and level of discussion

I also liked.
Beautifully went to a particular page.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от SAH

I also liked.
Beautifully went to a particular page.

And I am always amazed how easy it is provocative offtop all "caring company" turn on the emotional ogryzaniya (instead of simply sygnorirovat) ...


Well, I thought, people!

[I-V]

Сообщение от "Vivien

Site ARTinvestment.RU addressed to collectors and professional market participants, especially the galleries, investors and analysts.

All this is true, of course. Practical people have created a practical site. Impractical (I am first), among which are always a lot of artists, this simply never pull. But to talk about the art they really want. And what to do? Cafe Guerbois "remained in the distant past, and if there where, again practical long obihozheny, they are" music book "... All this reminds of parents and children. The first created a beautiful child, and children are delighted squirmy it recklessly, without knowing how much it cost. Parents watched with emotion as long until he would hear the sound of broken posudki ... And now someone is punished, and someone is offended, and children locked in a key ... But most importantly, I think that is still all love each other. As Rozanov wrote: it's time to swap all: let the parents respect the children, and children - like their parents.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от IV

But to speak about the art they really want.

Talk about investing in art without talking about the art itself is not possible.

The investment will be successful only in the present art, the art of quality, so to speak.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Talk about investing in art without talking about the art itself is not possible.
The investment will be successful only in the present art, the art of quality, so to speak.

But the DPJ's "creators" and "Sellers" everything can look completely different! Distracted "chatter" about painting artists can irritate business people, because all - not the case. Like, excuse me, irritated impressionism (well, all the "new") at the time. And not some academics, I suppose, but traders. Imagine Pearl in Salon with her in ... !) Of course, later had to because of this, a salon Independent, etc., but what works and how much time all it took! (And the funniest thing that the "practical" and it then "captured"). Ie here a certain dilemma: what comes first - the chicken or the egg? Artist of the seller or the seller for the artist (art)? One without the other can not (not in Paradise deuce, money to solve all the land)), but both are so different! The vendor is that the artist feels bad and will never. Just imagine what would be an independent forum of artists!))) Madhouse on macaroni factory (incidentally, at first. But then there would be "practical "))).

The investment will be successful in this art (the COP) - this is the LRA, in fact, all artists want to believe!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от I-V

Ie here a certain dilemma: what comes first - the chicken or the egg? Artist of the seller or the seller for the artist (art)?

To the remark director of the gallery "pantry" Paul Plohova that in Russia the curator creates the artist, Gelman said: « This is a myth. Without the artist, we none, and we can call ».

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

"This is a myth. Without the artist, we none, and we can call ».

Well, yes, I understand, of course: without a WATCH will not and yachts. He said, for example, Uncle Roman (and without any displeasure I. Yacht, too, need to be able to contain and, in general, be rich, though very difficult. No kidding.) But the question that the quality "field for the game" provides itself all- did not an artist. But it is interesting to play it only he can. Again, this is like, say, with the Indians. How to "savages" they are very good for tourists, but for the tourist business - worse than ever).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "IV

How to" savages "they are very good for tourists, but for the tourist business - worse than ever).

 After October 17, 1988 Congress passed a law to regulate gambling activities of Indian tribes, set the minimum restrictions on the employment gambling, casinos on Indian reservations opened more than 300.

[Allena]

It seems the problem is not which of us is an artist, dealer, or a regular fan painting. But what a difference! The point here is not a professional (paradoxically, given the goals and objectives of the forum), but in human communication.

How, again, said one of the participants of our forum nicola: cultivated, educated man, he is hungry and not dangerous. A man with no signs of education, even well-fed is to be feared.

Culture of communication - is a complicated thing. And it is either there or it is not, alas. So it turns bad joke, not very responsible statements, and most importantly - to get personal with complete confidence in his uprightness. And the newcomers, some participants doubtful whether such field say that for these participants simply feel ashamed, and yet people come to us for help is treated for professionals in a culturally to accept. Someone will say nothing, someone did not say nothing. Hence - all our problems. Just need to respect each other, regardless of profession and status. And then, guys, we live together!

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

After October 17, 1988 Congress passed a law to regulate gambling activities of Indian tribes, set the minimum restrictions on the employment gambling, casinos on Indian reservations opened more than 300.

Well, quite right! Without the law, ie without regulation of relations did not come out. Including the forum. The question is, who will be more authority to propose rules that would satisfy everyone. Authority as the U.S. Congress).