Is it possible to protect from vandalism?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Admin

But how about if the person specifically registered on the forum to put up for sale some work, calling to say the least doubt in the experts? And, of course, he did not discuss it in advance in the "Attribution".

Here now we have the dubious situation with the sale of A. Isacheva. I unwittingly embroiled in the debate, because I know a little history of the collection Mikhailova. Now, as I understand it, the question finds out he Mikhailov. I think it will be necessary to publish the result, whatever it was?

[SAH]

I want to touch upon the problems of vandalism on the part of participants who mercilessly write any nonsense in many themes and thus make trouble and apathy on the forum, ladies and gentlemen, when and most importantly how it can be stopped? Firstly greatly reduced the level of debate, and secondly, many simply stopped writing.

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от SAH

and most importantly how it can be stopped?

To my mind, but tight control from the manager, nothing comes.

And not all of the forum topics.
Democratic self-regulation does not exist, never existed and will not exist.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от SAH; 1313851"

I want to touch upon the problems of vandalism on the part of participants who mercilessly write any nonsense in many themes

Write who you mean, you can personal.

Сообщение от sergejnowo; 1313931"

my mind, but tight control from the manager, nothing comes.

Well we have and balance between tight control and freedom of speech.

[Люси]

Сообщение от SAH; 1313851"

I want to touch upon the problems of vandalism on the part of participants who mercilessly write any nonsense in many themes and thus make trouble and apathy on the forum, ladies and gentlemen, when and most importantly how it can be stopped? Firstly greatly reduced the level of debate, and secondly, many simply stopped writing.

Wikipedia
A person who disseminates flood, on the Internet slang - Fluder, in the literary language - chatterbox.

Flood is also called user messages in online forums and chat rooms, holding (in many cases) large volumes and do not carry any information or a very small amount of useful information.

In most forums, IRC-chat, etc. Fluder punished with ban for a period determined by the rules.
There is a gazebo for those wishing to speak on any topic .. So why clutter up interesting topics empty, not pertaining to the subject ..

[artman]

Frankly fed up with some flooder, word tyk-myk, and by the end of the * and *. Do not talk so good, because like all adult men.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от SAH; 1313851"

I want to touch upon the problems of vandalism by members who mercilessly write any nonsense in many themes and thus make trouble and apathy on the forum

I understand your mood and I remember your similar post in another topic.
But I think that these participants correctly named Lucy - "flooder".
Myself like an arbitrary contact-free, with jokes, rhymes, without them, see forum reference bureau, but when these "liberties" in the subject.
When you read a serious topic and "stumble" on the message that is to understand something you can not (either drunk, wrote that the participant with a blindfold), the mood to get a grasp, and that is used. very involved in the subject disappears.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Konstantin; 1313981"

Well we have and balance between tight control and freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not matter, but note that participants who have considerable knowledge and competent professional writing the maximum restraint and calibrated correctly, can not be said about the participants essentially amateurs. I now analyze the theme professional. The themes of politics and others too good to be self-criticism refers to the fact that we write and think and check information.
Konstantin, if we take into account the above said we can easily see a serious and interesting topics to write post after that, talk is already becoming difficult oochen. Many in a private conversation that recognizes an obstacle for them to write just now, this raised my problem.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от SAH

can be easily seen in the serious and interesting topics to write post after that, talk is already becoming difficult oochen.

Сообщение от SAH

The themes of politics and other

I suggest simply ban to go into politics and religion. (Unless it is connected with the explanation of any aspect of disclosing, deepening the essence of the theme)
I propose to ban online emotions on political and religious topics.
(Enough already!)

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

(whether drunk wrote,

And also come to the PC in a drunken state.
(The self-monitoring and word of honor word of honor=)

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And also come to the PC in a drunken state. (The self-monitoring and word of honor word of honor =)

That's not enough! Propose to introduce a restrictive system of admission to the forum. The most effective way - it's sobriety test and loyalty. Answered questions - pass! No answer - a sober, thought to work on themselves, come into line! ..

Can still be an IQ test to enter! But this later ... In the next stage ...