Wall, a nail and hammer, as an instrument togovli on regional markets

[Terehov]

Enough to see Sotheby's catalog of contemporary art and see a lot of evidence of my phrase of " inept " artists .
Npprimer eggs on the wall I do not consider an outstanding work .
A Picasso became Picasso " , largely due to the Shchukin and Paris .
For example Lubennikov no less talented than Warhol , but without the financial support it has not achieved such success .
And , for example Aivazovsky less known to the general world public , than Turner .

[artcol]

Сообщение от Terehov

For example Lubennikov no less talented than Warhol , but without the financial support it has not achieved such success .

I even think - more . As an artist . But there are so-called spirit of the times , and whoever it reflected - it is automatically included in the annals of " to the ability to draw the gift is irrelevant .

[Сергей Дородный]

Сообщение от Berth

A pooomnite how we (we?) All (all?) Not once a year, wrote in a school essay on the paintings on the lessons of Russian language and literature?
And these books were reproductions.
Ehh ...

Worse than this in school - only a dentist (tooth "-: eek >

[Posav]

Сообщение от Sergei burly , 1610571

Message from Pier View Post
A pooomnite how we ( we ? ) all (all? ) not once a year, wrote in a school essay on the paintings on the lessons of Russian language and literature ? And these books were reproductions . Ehh ...

Worse than this in school - only a dentist ( tooth "-)

Do not touch the holy ! I remember those pictures in textbooks . Our children went to the same - only shooter ubivalki from the masses . decadent and dying culture of bourgeois society.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Sergei burly , 1610571

Message from Berth
A pooomnite how we ( we ? ) all (all? ) not once a year, wrote in a school essay on the paintings on the lessons of Russian language and literature ? And these books were reproductions . Ehh ...

The idea was right and good , and if I ever return to it , then no harm , but good , kids will not . Only the main stumbling block - the picture !

For example, I was bored to write " Again, "two " or "Morning " Yablonska ( and , incidentally , that was something else ? ) . "Morning " by itself - a wonderful job, but work on it >

[Kaffsky]

Сообщение от Terehov

Aivazovsky less known to the general world public, than Turner.

Terehov, let me disagree with you!

This is, to put it mildly, and roughly speaking, is not so.
>

[Сергей Дородный]

Сообщение от Allena

The idea was right and good , and if I ever return to it , then no harm , but good , kids will not . Only the main stumbling block - the picture !

For example, I was bored to write " Again, "two " or "Morning " Yablonska ( and , incidentally , that was something else ? ) . "Morning " by itself - a wonderful job, but work on it >

Of course , I'm not opposed to aesthetic education.
Now in the schools ( do not know whether in all ) in the program for every theme is " World hudkultura .
But to describe the writings ( words ), pictures - horror IMHO .
Chukchi is not a writer , Chukchi risovatel .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Terehov

A less well known such as Aivazovsky wider global audience than Turner .

Сообщение от Kaffsky

Terehov, let me disagree with you !
This is , to put it mildly , and roughly speaking , is not so . >

And from what you , Kaffsky, do not you agree? Aivazovsky known in the world ?
In my opinion, he is known in Russia and the former Soviet Union.
Maybe in Turkey yet . >

[Kaffsky]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Aivazovsky known in the world ?
In my opinion, it is known only in Russia and the former Soviet Union .
Maybe even in Turkey . >

Cyril Syzransky, with a sense of humor, you have everything in order . >
Ivan Aivazovsky since the mid 19 th century was known in the world, and in the early 21 th century , suddenly - y- ps yea forgot ! >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Kaffsky

Ivan Aivazovsky since the mid 19 th century was known in the world, and in the early 21 th century, suddenly-y-ps yea forgot!
>

Yes, they knew, probably, in the 19 th.

Now some who his in the world know?