"Kidalovo, falshak, deception (psevdogalerei) - Страница 6 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Marta · 16.02.2010, 01:18

Represented very simple - on the Charter of SC I have the right to sell a certain number of pictures a year, only the tax anything about this for some reason does not know .. Any entrepreneur I certainly am not, and even under such a gun would not recognize .

"And, frankly, annoyed by the fact that such a profession as an artist, is, in fact, illegal. Also, as you call "kidalovo" in its own way. But people in our patient, adaptable. But the question hanging.

NATA NOVA · 16.02.2010, 01:44

Цитата:

Сообщение от Marta

on the Charter of SC I have the right to sell a certain number of pictures a year,

Marta, and how much? (or for how much. for what amount)

Marta · 16.02.2010, 01:49

In fact, 30-Th. But supposedly this document type internal and nothing to the general law does not. A free artist - it's just invisible man. As you and thinks, and fidget. From my point of view it is - normal.

NATA NOVA · 16.02.2010, 11:15

Цитата:

Сообщение от Marta

A free artist - it's just invisible man. As you and thinks, and fidget. From my point of view it is - normal.

Marta, everywhere a freelance writer (freelance) and was a private person-entrepreneur ...

"Profit" shall be taxed only after a certain amount. is due to inflation each year (almost) increases.
It does not depend on the type of activity. You can sell the paintings, and you can consult for the money .. It does not matter ..

Seriy · 16.02.2010, 11:30

Marta, but the problem with an individual private entrepreneur? is a form of ECP without a legal entity. Reporting minimum-now even reduced quarterly reports write-only annual. Tax-6%.
And you're an artist, writer, playwright or composer is your own business.
In Russia, all the creative people are doing exactly as ECP.
Difference from sellers tights-type activities, you are applying to the tax and you register as dealing with a certain type - for example, production and sale of printed items, paintings, prints. For every activity there is a code.

Marta · 16.02.2010, 15:23

Well, I'm not going to develop this theme here, because the topic is, in principle, the other - on the legal status or social (non) protection of the artist. But in my head does not fit as possible in one frame, insert artist and entrepreneur. Besides, I absolutely do not understand the latter, but, in my opinion, we have IE in any case, tax paid, regardless of whether there is profit or not. I'm not talking about the documentation, employment, and other inconsistencies - is generally quiet horror. There must be something else.

Seriy · 16.02.2010, 16:40

Marta, how terrible to live! :-)

NATA NOVA · 16.02.2010, 19:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от Marta

But in my head does not fit as possible in one frame, insert artist and entrepreneur.

"Entrepreneur" - this is just a common name, and nothing more. (For papers) procedure is ..
Entrepreneur, means simply a person that no one obeys and takes what he wants. (replace the "entrepreneur" to "artist" and that's that)

16.02.2010, 01:18	Язык оригинала: Русский #51
Marta Guest Сообщений: n/a	Represented very simple - on the Charter of SC I have the right to sell a certain number of pictures a year, only the tax anything about this for some reason does not know .. Any entrepreneur I certainly am not, and even under such a gun would not recognize . "And, frankly, annoyed by the fact that such a profession as an artist, is, in fact, illegal. Also, as you call "kidalovo" in its own way. But people in our patient, adaptable. But the question hanging. Последний раз редактировалось Marta; 16.02.2010 в 01:37.

16.02.2010, 11:30	Язык оригинала: Русский #55
Seriy Гуру Регистрация: 26.03.2009 Адрес: Москва-Киев Сообщений: 7,078 Спасибо: 4,985 Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях Репутация: 12970	Marta, but the problem with an individual private entrepreneur? is a form of ECP without a legal entity. Reporting minimum-now even reduced quarterly reports write-only annual. Tax-6%. And you're an artist, writer, playwright or composer is your own business. In Russia, all the creative people are doing exactly as ECP. Difference from sellers tights-type activities, you are applying to the tax and you register as dealing with a certain type - for example, production and sale of printed items, paintings, prints. For every activity there is a code. __________________ художник Ixygon - http://artnow.ru/ru/gallery/3/9765/picture/0/0.html

16.02.2010, 16:40	Язык оригинала: Русский #57
Seriy Гуру Регистрация: 26.03.2009 Адрес: Москва-Киев Сообщений: 7,078 Спасибо: 4,985 Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях Репутация: 12970	Marta, how terrible to live! :-) __________________ художник Ixygon - http://artnow.ru/ru/gallery/3/9765/picture/0/0.html

16.02.2010, 01:49	Язык оригинала: Русский #53
Marta Guest Сообщений: n/a	In fact, 30-Th. But supposedly this document type internal and nothing to the general law does not. A free artist - it's just invisible man. As you and thinks, and fidget. From my point of view it is - normal.

16.02.2010, 15:23	Язык оригинала: Русский #56
Marta Guest Сообщений: n/a	Well, I'm not going to develop this theme here, because the topic is, in principle, the other - on the legal status or social (non) protection of the artist. But in my head does not fit as possible in one frame, insert artist and entrepreneur. Besides, I absolutely do not understand the latter, but, in my opinion, we have IE in any case, tax paid, regardless of whether there is profit or not. I'm not talking about the documentation, employment, and other inconsistencies - is generally quiet horror. There must be something else.