Photography (photography), art (painting)

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Yaya

about white balance. There are special filters that are placed on floodlights, they can be regulirat color temperature. Other filters light scatter. This helps avoid glare.

Generally, if you're so serious about, I'm afraid (my opinion), a Nikon you have to throw in the trash . There were no main issues you are with him decide. A must buy something truly adult. For example, as this wondrous lord.

I think that the color filters on spotlights or lens is logical to apply to film cameras because they have no opportunity to adjust "white balance" in the principle.

I have always set very seriously. That is how my fascination with tourist souvenirs, shopping has become a beautiful hobby, which is implicitly required so fully explore this section of the photo. Although six months ago I was a complete ignoramus in digital photography pictures. If you need to - buy better equipment, but for now I hope with my performance requirements do inexpensive "SLR. All the photographers with whom I consulted on this account have the same opinion that the above Nikon or Canon equivalent would be sufficient to achieve the highest reasonable quality for the site and printing. Above - not trebuetslya for printing. So I still hope to save on photography equipment that this money could be spent on new paintings.

 And this "wondrous master" I watch in the hands of a simple and inexpensive reflector golden. They are used in portrait photography to improve the color of the subject. Reflectors come in different sizes and colors: white, silver and zolotisnye, are cheap.

[Yaya]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, I do not mean his reflectors. I'm talking about his camera. "Reflect", in which case, and a simple paper can

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Yaya

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, I do not mean his reflectors. I'm talking about his camera. "Reflect" in which case, and a simple paper can

I'm on your photo camera just did not notice. I noticed a gentleman with a reflector.

[v_r]

Some simple and practical recommendations.
Pictures should be photographed on the street under natural sunlight in the shade. This would avoid the glare and the displacement in color.
In cases where there is no possibility to make a picture to be photographed on the street, it is desirable to use a telephoto lens.
Do not neglect the scale. You can print the 100%black, 50%gray, white. When printing using color palette CMYK. Therefore, you can also use the color scale on the same scheme: C (cyan) - Blue, M (magenta) - magenta, Y (yellow) - Yellow. Colour scale accurately fit the color of the color channels.
Flares, reflectors, color filters when photographing paintings use highly undesirable.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от v_r

Pictures should be photographed on the street under natural sunlight in the shade. ...
Flares, reflectors, color filters when photographing paintings use highly undesirable.

Natural sunlight does not allow comfortable all year. It is hard to drag out dozens of paintings of large size. In the sunlight, like a shadow, will have to run - the sun does not stand still.

Flashes and reflectors make it possible once set up in the studio light and then work continuously. Again, I do not recommend using ordinary lamps with incandescent bulbs - they are yellow, because they have a color temperature of 2700-3000 degrees Kelvin. However, this can be overcome by setting up "white balance", as has already been written on the subject. I bought a pulsed flash with a color temperature of approximately 5600 degrees Kelvin, which corresponds to sunlight.

Color filters - I agree, no need, as introduce distortions in color. They are required only for artistic effects. We also want to re-shoot the picture as accurately as possible.

[v_r]

It is precisely the picture of a large amount identified for such treatment. Such a trifle as photographing the street patterns of large size on the street is quite possible to survive.
Even I can add that scan large slide allows to achieve better image quality than a digital camera makes ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от v_r

scan large slide allows to achieve better image quality than a digital camera makes ...

Exactly. But more expensive. Today Show for album used to, for example, covers, some fragmentation within the publication. Ordinary images, renproduktsii and a good figure is possible.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

I consider it necessary to explain.

By creating a theme, I was counting on the level of ordinary private collector or gallery. Ie The level of an amateur photographer with a soap box is not suitable, but the level of the museum with great potential for wide-format scanners, and super-expensive equipment too not discuss rationally.
Some are slightly above said COP. I have to, gritting his teeth and accept it.

I share my own experience, which is enough to make the hard-line personnel to the Internet or decent photos for offset printing. In their advice, I'll try to stick to common sense and the minimum possible (reasonable) cost level equipment. Do not over-save, but not worth paying more for nothing.

PS

The site SOVKOMa - disgusting photo. Especially they that if they do so? As if out of focus.

It was like something in the gallery Leonid Shishkin. I saw how they Photographer shoots for the catalog. Surprised that used primitive equipment - only an external flash. But this gallery-quality photos compared with SOVKOMom order of magnitude higher!
Is a pity to spend a maximum of a few tens of thousand on a normal studio lighting?

[sur]

Сообщение от inquisitive

sur,
Elementary scanner EPSON (V-200). Cheap and strong. Very easy to use and good resolution

 Thanks to them I just took. See photos now lay out.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Yesterday I finally got to his home studio equipment:

1) digital SLR camera Nikon D5000 with lens AF-S 18-55 F/3.5G DX VR - 22400 rub.
2) an additional battery ENKATSU NK EN-EL9 /Nikon EN-EL9 - 696 rub.
3) HOYA PL-CIR HD 52 mm polarizing filter - 2420 rub.
4) The memory card SDHC 16GB SanDisk Ultra (SDSDH-016G-E11) - 1620 rub.
5) Tripod Manfrotto 055XPROB with head 804RC2 - 8900 rub.
previously purchased:
6) a set of impulse studio lighting (flash) Raylab (200 J), complete with a 60x60 softbox. In addition, I took a white umbrella reflection of 110 cm All together about 13,000 rubles.
7) IR-synchronizer - about 1000 rubles.

Total costs amounted to about 50 thousand rubles. I consider this a minimal amount for the studio, because the equipment was selected on the basis of techno-economic feasibility and buy at the lowest prices in Moscow.

Whether such costs are justified to shoot pictures? Share information after osvoyu this wisdom into practice.

PS

The camera I had almost forgotten yesterday in the studio Boris Kocheyshvili. Thank you for time, Tamara recalled.