On human decency!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от alferova

Difficulties that gallery can experience in real time, understand ...

What there is complexity?
This is not about the "complexity" speech, and how to properly called a topic, about human decency!
Behave dishonorably these gallery owners. That's all ...

[Люси]

So imagine the director of "Pictures" Nastya asked him to sell her one of the works of Sergei costs 7-year old Nastya .. agreed, making a nice gesture, right against self .. So even "personally for his" picture, the director is unable to pay with Nastya! ..

[artcol]

Сообщение от alferova

Yes, indeed, all true. This unpleasant situation here. Difficulties that gallery can feel at the moment, understood ... But very confused by the fact that they work in question were sold to a gallery or today and not yesterday, but much earlier.

With galleries this happens, especially in a crisis. And not only with our own, believe me. Art-service will not go anywhere, get money, I think.

[Люси]

What happens then? .. You'll excuse me 7 years have passed ... Problem Art service is only their problem .. let's really not going to justify them.
 It is a small amount in 7 years! recently had a wonderful auction, which I attended along with the director of "Art of Service", based on the number of lots won the director of the gallery things are going very evening.

recent exhibition of their Katie Medvedeva held .. sales were, therefore, tales about the crisis here as something inappropriate.

[luka77]

Сообщение от Lucie

tales about the crisis there as it irrelevant.

It was not funny when the crisis justified!
Convenient excuse, but good conscience should have

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от artcol

Art-service will not go anywhere, get money, I think.

hopefully, I hope to trial it will not come

[artcol]

Сообщение от Lucy

What does happen? .. You'll excuse me 7 years have passed ... Problem Art Service is only their problem .. let's really not going to justify them.
 It is a small amount in 7 years! recently been a remarkable auction, which I attended along with the director of "Art of Service", based on the number of lots won the Director of the Gallery's case they're very even.

recent exhibition of their Katie Medvedeva held .. sales were, therefore, tales about the crisis here as something inappropriate.

I did not blame them? What do you mean?
Just stating a fact: it happens. You must strive for.
Consider the fact that there is a director (CEO) and has one owner.

Recently, they now work not gave the artist - I have it the buyer was. So what ever I do not excuse them, believe me!
Moreover, the gallery itself should money. But those far beyond the ocean, but here all within the time available.

[sur]

Сообщение от SAH

pictures of his family property of the artist, gallery owner if they want to seize that he is a thief, and this can and will need to speak loudly (heard everything). In this situation properly is to pay someone else to whom it belongs.

  I think this is a powerful lever of influence. Hint, that if no payment (kidnyaka) give them information persecution.
 And be sure to do this, if they do not pay for. To further discourage others had to deceive you.
  Be sure to specify a timetable and terms of payment. Do not listen to the excuse about the crisis, the work had been sold just in the boom years.

[Marta]

Why not consult with a lawyer and do not tune in to the court? If people do not initially go to the contact in the framework of decency, it is unlikely that a sudden change. But the nerves will spoil .

[sur]

Сообщение от Marta

Why not consult with a lawyer and did not tune in to the court?

 The arbitral tribunal case dreary and even its positive decision does not mean the money.
 First, ask the judge to conclude a settlement agreement and agree on a payment schedule. But then if no payment should be another hearing, and may be appointed bailiffs leave. But this is not a panacea because bailiffs can not find any property and proceeds to the account may also not be long.
  Arbitration will take over the case only if there is a full set of documents, as well as I understand it not. And the head of the gallery is well aware.

 Where the Day of Judgement, for the gallery and people working in it can be a loss of business reputation. If spare no effort, time and money may be small, you can create a negative image as a reliable picture of the commission.
And it may already have for her serious material losses.

I know what the gallery in question, and he recently visited her. Gallery serious and I think that its leadership would prefer to find common ground and settle, rather than permanently ruin your business image.

 P.S. Maybe things are really seams. They have to spend on staff salaries and rent. I think that the amount is incident is not small, but in any case they are wrong because works have been sold long ago.

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от "Lucy, 1122151

Employees galleries on the phone say that their wages delayed, so the extent to which bad thing .. do not have such a solid gallery located in the CHA-2-thousand dollars ..

In this situation, nothing to stand on ceremony with them, feel free to serve them to court for fraud for fear of bad publicity and loss of their reputation they have, if people are smart, will be asked to take a statement by paying his duty ... A delay of salary, simply excuse.