|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #11 |
|
Banned
Регистрация: 13.09.2009
Сообщений: 1,336
Спасибо: 3,092
Поблагодарили 3,710 раз(а) в 961 сообщениях
Репутация: 7412
|
Let pomotrim at the situation differently ... a woman comes to the gallery owner and said "Give me the picture of her husband ... Here's the receipt ..." Looking at her gallery owner in full Moroz said that he neither she nor her husband did not even know ... if it is a thousand times wrong ... it does not prove it.
First we have to prove that she was his legal wife, not mistress, and at the time the picture was legally married ... Second, whether the paintings exhibited in gallery originals or not .. who will do ekspertizu ... gallery owner will tell - this is a copy ... (at best), then what? And .. Receipt ... who and what proves that her signature on the owner of the gallery .. .. Hold handwriting examinations too expensive and who is going to do it ... And the owner to appeal to the mercy of decency ... seems useless ... |
|
|
|