Pricing policy relationship with the artist gallery

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Vaulin Alexey

tirazirovanie prinosit den'gi - and the popularity !!!

Bezuslovno. My uze gde-to obsuzdali temu "Vsenarodnoi liubvi "

But! Unfortunately, scare the true connoisseurs who love art,

Ih tak malo, chto imi mozno prenebrech'

 followed by the result leads to the devaluation of the cultural product.

Kogda on stal produktom, to obestsenivanie mozet proizoiti v rezul'tate nepravil'noi marketingovoi politiki.

[DSF]

Perhaps, over time, in painting to happen the same division, as in music, in pop and classical music. One segment will be designed for mass reproduction, the other - on a narrower range of viewers. And they would exist in parallel.

[AlexanderG]

Ia dumaiu, my k etomu blize, chem kazetsia.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от DSF

may eventually happen in painting the same division, as in music, in pop and classical music. One segment will be designed for mass reproduction, the other - on a narrower range of viewers. And they would exist in parallel.

And now there is such a division-of the art and hack, or what was being done by the artist to sell-because he knows that this is not serious, and weakly, but want to eat and the money for it platyatogogo what, and creativity-then.

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от DSF

may eventually happen in painting the same division, as in music, in pop and classical music. One segment will be designed for mass reproduction, the other - on a narrower range of viewers. And they would exist in parallel.

It is very important to understand what you mean by "mass circulation"?

Сообщение от Pavel

the art and hack, or what was being done by the artist to sell-because he knows that this is not serious, and weakly, but want to eat, and money is what platyatogogo and creativity, sweat.

Tell me Paul, but perhaps the French Impressionists did not work to order or
 sale. Worked. And dreams to sell and for little money to be able to do more. But the hack that's simply not call ... The fact that they worked (at most) for the sake of ideas and art, and the money was only a tool for work and life, and today, more and more - for the sake of money and art - a means of obtaining them ....

[DSF]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

It is very important to understand what you mean by "mass circulation"?

I mean what written AlexanderG "na DH rabotaet bolee 150 chelovek. Ogromnoe kolichestvo otnositel'no nedorogih predmetov".

Сообщение от Pavel

And now there is such a division-of the art and hack, or what was being done by the artist to sell-because he knows that this is not serious, and weakly, but want to eat and the money for it platyatogogo which, as work - later.

All right. Only now we call this a hack artist, but tomorrow it would be called "art-star" or somewhere else, like "King of still life.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

It is very important to understand what you mean by "mass circulation"?

Tell me Paul, but perhaps the French Impressionists did not work to order or
 sale. Worked. And dreams to sell and for little money to be able to do more. But the hack that's simply not call ... The fact that they worked (at most) for the sake of ideas and art, and the money was only a tool for work and life, and today, more and more - for the sake of money and art - a means of obtaining them ....

Impressionist ordered because so no one knew how to get the original thing for very modest money and everyone knew, or hoped that this thing will be very valuable. I ordered those who believe in them and who did not believe ordered more expensive than many times in Ak, who were able to better, more agile, but unable to fly, have been mediocre, have worked for talent, and by the rules.
The Impressionists were doing fine, and academicians, the right thing.
Money as they all need to support a family.
Moonlighting is earning on the side. Do such things will not be costly. Their fate-udeshevlenie.Eto thrown money. The artist tricks himself, a merchant-buyer, but this can earn only a short time. The artist then nothing can be done.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от DSF

I mean what written AlexanderG "na DH rabotaet bolee 150 chelovek. Ogromnoe kolichestvo otnositel'no nedorogih predmetov".

Requests:
1. 150 people. hired before the auction sale (special)
2. "Inexpensive items" is 1 butterfly glued on holst.diam 60 ms. colored households. Paint one color and stoyashy 30 000 pounds?
3.Deystvitelno, a huge number of unsold items (hundreds) accumulated in the White Cuba.

And finally, when will the information on the secondary market, which zayavlchl Alexander G (all waiting for ..)
Also time and place of the auction, the price of work, the work itself (well, the one who sold "more than the guitar McCartney") is interesting also .. (Everyone is waiting ..)

[Marta]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

The fact that they worked (at most) for the sake of ideas and art, and the money was only a tool for work and life, and today, more and more - for the sake of money, and the arts - their only means of obtaining ....

No, a maximum of 50x50 those who specifically works for money and those who for the sake of money "for work and life." Second big. Just life more expensive. 15 years ago was enough to sell a picture or two and year to live, do what you want, work as you want. А сейчас чуть ли не в месяц нужно продавать картину, чтобы просто жить дальше. Moreover, several times more than then, as a result - worse. For someone - in three months for someone and one month does not solve the problem. But the difference is not in principle. Life has changed. Accordingly, although, of course, the rules dictate the gallery (and rightly so), but the artists, too, appears "pricing", otherwise you can stay with nothing.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Marta

No, no, a maximum of 50x50 those who specifically works for money and those who for the sake of money "for work and life." Second big. Just life more expensive. 15 years ago was enough to sell a picture or two and year to live, do what you want, work as you want. Now, almost a month to sell now, just to live on. Moreover, several times more than then, as a result - worse. For someone - in three months for someone and one month does not solve the problem. But the difference is not in principle. Life has changed. Accordingly, although, of course, the rules dictate the gallery (and rightly so), but the artists, too, appears "pricing", otherwise you can remain with nothing.

So it was and always will be. Artists and so small that the profession is risky. It is easy to slip in a decent painting.