Продам: Mikhail Vrubel

[Mihail]

Murashko taught there in the drawing school, perhaps it is his sketch, and painting of his students, Murashko studied in St. Petersburg with Repin, then went to Kiev. But Vrubel just another, it is not his fresco.

[Сергей Кит]

[QUOTE=Mihail; 763,791 Vrubel But just another, it is not his fresco. [/QUOTE]
 Kirillovskaya Church investigated dozens of art critics and historians, well, I'm really not ready to argue with the official version! Good night!
Sincerely, Sergei.

[Тютчев]

Most likely, this fresco work Vrubel "Entombment." First - remember that when the works on the conservation of frescoes of St. Cyril's Church 12 th and 18 th centuries Vrubel, which Professor Prahov attracted to the painting, was only 25 years. He was young ... His style has not yet arisen in the one to which we are accustomed to. And the second time - before it has been tasked to stylize its frescoes painted by that time. He was not only restore the victims, but also write a new replacement of the lost. Before we begin the work of Michael studied preserved frescoes of St. Cyril's Church and St. Sophia Cathedral and St. Michael Cathedral. Is a fact.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Sergey Keith

«Tombstone crying»

This is probably the same thing as the "Entombment", only in other words.

[Mihail]

Not so simple, why then in his other frescoes of the age of 25 is visible to his hand problems were the same, and only in this no. Not converge it all! While I do not believe that it is his hand.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Sergey Keith

Never say never I also got excited with the Vladimir Cathedral, still proposed sketch is better suited to this fresco (Kirill my respects )

I really never saw these murals! Thank you, Sergey Kit, it was interesting because you learn a new facet of creativity for me, the great Russian artist!

None of the albums and catalogs available to me, simply do not have these images.

[Mihail]

Fast you surrendered, ready to believe everything that is written, but not his eyes. In the sketch is once again look at it something about it, it is not Vrubel.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Mihail

quickly you give up, ready to believe everything that is written, but not his eyes. In the sketch is once again look at it something about it, it is not Vrubel.

About the sketch to the painting of the 1 st position (#1) I have not changed his opinion. I hold my opinion:

Сообщение от Tjutchev

yak, looked once more work Vrubel (I have a 4-D different editions) and not yet found anything like, unfortunately. You are someone of the experts testified this work?

Signed by the way, is also not very much and looks like a reference signature Vrubel.

Added after 26 minutes
Here's another 5-SW prolistnul booklet, but also anything resembling ...

I really do like have not found yet. That is, this work is like no one I know the work ...

[Сергей Кит]

Way, I also did not master the work, he must have slept a long time while we learn a great

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Sergey Keith

I'm way too not master the work, he must have slept a long time while we learn a great

That I am ready to do at any time! "a long time going to sleep, but could not resist ... I love to see pictures! There is such a sin ...

[Mihail]

Yes, really, it's time to sleep .. sketch is made is not bad, I think that Murashko, then it all comes down, he did not know enough stars in the Academy, not what Repin, Vrubel And then Repin said that he does not know how to draw ... but it is not the case, he simply otherwise arranged, it's obvious from his other paintings at the same time and in the same church