Продам: Charming

[Фордочка]

Marie de 'Medici was also recognized urodkoy, but she was queen, and her portrait is not spit and do not throw ...... but will vosstorgatsya the wizard ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]
(And I think that is the fulcrum.) [/QUOTE]

I am also very sorry that you mean another foothold that the fence .....

[Konstantin]

Since nothing new either to hear or say in this topic can not offer it to close.
What will the public?

[Фордочка]

What will the public? [/QUOTE]

Mr. Admin! It is so decided?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Fordochka

Mr. Admin! It is so decided?

No, of course.
Just Mr. Admin fears, in my opinion, that the discussion of your portrait can go into a discussion obsuzhdantov.

[Фордочка]

Photo 1 of 1

Figure Amadeo Modigliani, depicting Anna Akhmatova, Russia donated Swedish fund "Rurik"

www.fontanka.ru

The main material on the topic:
Russia presented a portrait of Akhmatova's work of Modigliani

[Yaya]

Fordochka, and that? is well-known works, all of them have seen. what do you mean?

[Konstantin]

And a strange discussion. Topic author tries to convince forumchan that picture with a high level of painting, depicts a beautiful woman and that it Akhmatova. If the author and so it knows what the question?

PS
Thank you for not insisting that it Kuinji.

PS
About devil evil eye, while writing, and in this respect perhaps there is a hint that it is Modigliani.

[uriart]

Konstantin, with Kuindzhi already have!
Modigliani also have!
Who's next, Lord?

[Фордочка]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Yes, and a strange discussion. Topic author tries to convince forumchan that picture with a high level of painting, depicts a beautiful woman and that it Akhmatova. If the author and so it knows what the question?

PS
Thank you for not insisting that it Kuinji.

PS
About devil evil eye, while writing, and in this respect perhaps there is a hint that it is Modigliani.

Mr. Admin! Discussion also in my opinion .... strange even to me and you are trying to ascribe those beliefs that are not ...:
1. I'm trying to draw attention to the level, because it has inv. № - then it somewhere has been registered and is a strange word "SPECIAL"
2. I never said that it was a beautiful woman: her some furomchane called urodkoy, "Stebaev" and t.d.po-this I gave the example of Maria de Medici ....
3. I drew attention to Modigliani to mean that the artist has the right to offer their own vision of nature that he did not reproduce with accuracy, but rather to offer schematic manner, ie frees to viewers imagination.
4. I never insist that depicts Anna Akhmatova, I just assumed
5. Some forumcanam I am grateful for the careful approach to teme.Tolko some tried to turn the discussion in "banter" at me. In vain did, it does no credit to them, although they are in the rank of "experienced" and "authority" (strange skills!! Just like the ground is not so Dep ......)
6. But with Kuindzhi ... You too hvatanuli .....
7. Topic author does not know everything ... no pictures of the author and not the name of nature .....

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Yaya

Fordochka, and that? is well-known works, all of them have seen. what do you mean?

... I have already said, that she wanted to .... Your velichistvenny tone, and your heavenly view ...... I'm not inclined to surrender .....!!!)))))

[Allena]

Сообщение от Fordochka

strange word "SPECIAL"

I did not want to interfere in the discussion, but I found it interesting that: the word "SPECIAL" seems to me that might mean staying in the work of some special depositories. Perhaps the author was arrested, and the work was confiscated. Perhaps not the author, and the model, if it is a real person, but I think that after all the author. Why Spetskhran, rather than destruction? I do not know.
Cyril Syzransky, what do you think?
Fordochka, you do not get me wrong, and begin to dig up the provenance. If the work was delivered to you accidentally, then it will be difficult. But still, I believe, in this case is necessary to first explore the painting and not the possible identity of the model, and the history of existence of the picture, stock number, etc. Then, perhaps, find the name of the author.