Fakes ... Fakes ...

[Allena]

It remains for me a quote from the first sentence of my previous post, or refuse comments.

[Pluh]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

The question arose: but whether there are examples of fraud (fraud), mostly (mostly) the motive would not be financially?
So far as it rests on the Bud money ...
And what were the motives zaimstvovanty Picasso?
And Hirst?

Sorry, but you confuse the concept. Borrowing and fake. Is existing paintings executed by Picasso, but signed, such as Renoir, Dufy, or Gauguin, Rembrandt and Botticelli, and so on. Borrowing from the great artist, a very small part of the creative process. That if you want the knowledge and recognition of another master artist. And for that he bears full responsibility putting his signature on the product. Falsifiers, in most cases, still concerned about the commercial component and may in some cases increase their self-esteem - and so I can not. But this is deceptive triumph. After all, stolen everything - plot, technique, vision and chuvstvoa master and finally his name. He did not master, he is simply a coward, afraid to put their creativity to the audience, of course, if such he holds.

[Allena]

All in a heap! Let us still divide the counterfeiting, plagiarism and appropriatsiyu. This is completely different things. In order not to deviate from the topic fakes, here on the site of appropriatsii have a great article Yulia Maximova, which has repeatedly referred. I can quote and I

http://artinvestment.ru/invest/stori...ation_art.html

We're talking about fakes, when the work is produced in a certain manner, with a purpose and it put someone else's name.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[NATA NOVA]

[dedulya37]

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Pluh

Sorry, but you confuse the concept. Borrowing and fake. Is existing paintings executed by Picasso, but signed, such as Renoir, Dufy, or Gauguin, Rembrandt and Botticelli, and so on. Borrowing from the great artist, a very small part of the creative process. That if you want the knowledge and recognition of another master artist. And for that he bears full responsibility putting his signature on the product. Falsifiers, in most cases, still concerned about the commercial component and may in some cases increase their self-esteem - and so I can not. But this is deceptive triumph. After all, stolen everything - plot, technique, vision and chuvstvoa master and finally his name. He did not master, he is simply a coward, afraid to put their creativity to the audience, of course, if such he holds.
     

 I'm not mistaken. (You do not understand vroprosa) Answers, replicas remarks moved to the subject of fraud:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...11#post1252311

[OlegTsi]

That such Kustodieva exposes the auction house Dyumushell, USA.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[Allena]

I also read as "V. Tkachenko, and the place - in my opinion, it does not Kazan, and Pool.