Mitka, a stop on a 25-year anniversary. The exhibition in St. Petersburg

[Pavel]

Сообщение от fabosch

You know, Cyril, is debatable. Well, that is, by and large you are probably right. And even then, it is not clear. It would be easier to break one by one the Impressionists, do you think? And by the way, they, too, lacked a very ordinary. quite a mediocre artist. Just a story, as always, clever straushka, their not very maintained. But even some feeble works now will cost money, just because it's the Impressionists. And that, some of them have lost their individuality? No, you know, this kind of associations are very helpful at the initial stage of the creative ways. And then everything happens just as always happens - that's Mitka quarreled because large individual was closely within a group with all ...

I'm not mistaken, there's your work?

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But we must not confuse Shagin, Sr. (author of the tram, Vladimir Nikolayevich Shagin (1932-1999)) and junior-Mitka.

Here's a look at the way Shinkareva and DA Shagin.
I am sure - the first blows up, and the second will be so ekstluatirovat mask, which he, incidentally, the first and came up with. And he will espluatirovat this role Mitka not at shows, and in the offices of government officials. Artist out there, it seems to me, I will be glad to make a mistake, he died long ago. No?

Cyril, you, as always, hits the nail on the head. Just because I live here and how would it delicately put it, pomyagshe formulate

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Impressionists called themselves "Impressionists"? Gave their exhibitions this name? Wrote the story of his "movement" in life?

No, Cyril, you too, please do not distort. We talked about the role played by the group for an artist - cancels his personality, or vice versa. And not that anyone out there myself rekllamiruet and moves, and someone accidentally it happened (about the accident at impresssionistov, too, do not la-la, but not here on this question). But the fact is that if the artist has a strong artistic personality, its no group can snivelirovat or score, but for artists it is smaller in caliber could pose a threat

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

I'm not mistaken, there's your work?

Pavel, I do not quite understand your question.
I - not an artist, and collector.
Therefore there (at the show) is my work in the sense of belonging to me.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Each time, sets its mashtap.

For me, Mitya Shagin - is something like David Burliuk, including the quality of painting, and conformism.
Like anything outstanding did not, but some shevelilovo provided.

What is called the soul of the group.

But there was something they made to the atmosphere during the restructuring, showed their form of behavior, it is quite charming.

[Konstantin]

All posts about creativity Burliuk suffered in a relevant subject

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...1115&highlight =%D0%91%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%BA

[Сова-Арт]

As for the "Fathers", the exhibition represented another significant character in the St. Petersburg of the second half of the 20 th century, is closely associated with artists range Aref'eva. It is well-known poet and artist Oleg Grigoriev, who is without a doubt, has had a significant impact on Mitkov. The exhibition includes well-known to all from childhood collection of poems, "Jackass" 1971 edition, "A bird in a cage, and others, as well as a collection of paintings by Oleg Grigoryev.

[Сова-Арт]

And here's another photo of Oleg Grigoryev and drawings.

[Pavel]

The exhibition was apparently intended as an apotheosis, but it turned out simply to demonstrate the middle of painting. Now, if passed some sort of comparison, such as graduates of the Academy, the Muscovites, or even with someone, so you can compare, it would be goraaazdo fun, and an occasion for praise at a buffet table. Not only have contests, clashes, and all that where truth is born or even be visible level.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Pavel

Exhibition apparently was intended as an apotheosis, but it turned out simply to demonstrate the middle of painting. Now, if passed some sort of comparison, such as graduates of the Academy, the Muscovites, or even with someone, so you can compare, it would be goraaazdo fun, and an occasion for praise at a buffet table. Not only have contests, clashes, and all that where truth is born or at least visible level.

You know, Pavel, at each show its format. This exhibition is devoted to Mitya, do not know about the apotheosis, but the popularity of it will undoubtedly enjoy. About the level of art - are all relatively even within Mitkov, as is generally always in such associations. Of course, the big disadvantage of this exhibition is that no two main characters. Well, so what Selyava went with a live and
And about the comparison and competition, then, you know what the picture - you can certainly hang next to Mitka academics or the Muscovites, but it will not lead to any fundamentally new result, in the sense that there will be winners and losers. Some viewers will be spitting in some, others - for others. And even then the proportion of those viewers will agree, nothing to say this will not happen.
And by the way, here at the annual exhibition of the same St.Pete Manege Petersburg-2010 "(forthcoming)," St. Petersburg 2009, "etc., which takes the artist on one painting, and going on: the right - the academics, the left - Left. And what's the point ... Is that the winner will determine the weighting

[ФАИв]

Owl-Art, Thank you, what an outstanding poet - it is well known, but now that it is not without hdozhestvennogo gift - seen gazing.
Very interesting pictures.
See: here for you and Tselkov and Krasnopevtsev herring and hi-Rabin))) - all feedback is.
Thanks again!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "FAIv

hi herring-Rabin)))

A Kuzma Sergeyevich?