Question?

[DSF]

Personally, I can only express their opinions about the artist, the painting which I saw in the original. Make any conclusions based on the image on the monitor, I know not. Art is too difficult. So I'd rather say nothing.
     In general, if an artist exhibiting his paintings on public display, it should be ready to hear any opinions, including unflattering. And anyone who saw them, has the right to speak as he pleases. However, I do not quite understand why the artist to listen to it all? Is it adds to it talent? Maybe he sees his weaknesses and will work better? I strongly doubt this. All public activities of the artist seeks only to attract buyers. If we could do without all this fuss, it would be wonderful.

Сообщение от Fed

Then the result and called art, but not exclusively by sublimation. Is this the result of the product only for consumption by a group of people who have learned some humanities? Yes - if only they would consume this product.

And if the painting to someone else like - well, well!
Well, if now and then placed in a museum, reproductions printed on wrappers and hung on Tverskaya Street, the artist has is to blame

Сообщение от curious

Of course, every artist considers himself a genius.

No, not everyone. Only Pavel

[NATA NOVA]

If the forum ArtINVESTMENT, then criticism (implied) Dolna be from a position of Investments (investment potentials).

(IMHO)

[Самвел]

. I am not against poddakivany the contrary, let it be in the rules of the game, but these poddakivaniya should not deceive. Do not impose, not to say beautiful words, do not glorify the artist, because that's what makes writing a bit rude. or refer to some third party who is about him as he sang.
weakness or strength of contemporary artists? [/QUOTE]
Well firstly I have no extensive knowledge do not have, and honestly I feel a bit awkward. What if you what that prize is awarded, but you know that you do not deserve. At the expense of writes about LCR, say so. I have read one book and understood nothing, but heard as authoritative people in this area, says admiringly of the author and the book itself. I, too, will applaud them, but did not understand.

[SAH]

I, too, will applaud them, but did not understand. [/QUOTE]
By the way here as I think a key point appeared. If People authoritative admire the author and to you (we) may not understand what that means is, to aspire to is not it? There is much growth. I think that the forum is an excellent resource for self-education, unique - not afraid of the word.

[Самвел]

but it is clear that the misunderstanding. So, anyway, that at least something I understand.

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от SAH

By the way here as I think a key point appeared. If People authoritative admire the author and to you (we) may not understand what that means is, to aspire to is not it? There is much growth. I think that the forum is an excellent resource for self-education, unique - not afraid of the word.

This key question of trust considered authoritative people is not as simple as it seems.
Subject to their candor - YES.
But if the views of participants in the discussion agree on the direction of silence impartial (if it had something happens), then, in my opinion, not worth a farthing of that authority. On market day.
For dolgostyu stay on the forum, some seem to have forgotten about the goals and objectives of the forum. And he must pursue the development of investment in art, ie attract money (customers and patrons).
How does it not seem strange.
For some members of the forum.
This Renoir could afford to write for artists.
First, I somehow did not notice at the forum level artists Renoir, and secondly, the times are far from Renoir.
So sometimes it is necessary to remember the goals and objectives of the forum, to help him by virtue of its ability.
And do not try to turn the forum into an elite club for the elite of elite artists and art critics.
Many similar sites, but ours - is unique. Because it acts as a link between the artist and the investor. In such circumstances odnogolosoe - like death. For the forum.
Moreover, the discussion is based on the equality of chattering. Blind adherence to authority is fraught. Enough to look at pictures from North Korea and remember our recent past, when the whole country was thrown back pants running for the Komsomol.
So I'm very glad polyphony of our forum before as long as some non-starts to skid on the individual. Then the discussion begins and ends with rudeness. It seems to be intelligent people.
It does not add credibility to our forum.
Which really has something to draw.
And it is - happy.
I think so.

[iside]

It is not the second time it said. [/QUOTE]
You can not imagine how glad I am that you noticed it. It would be even more pleased when you can understand it.
Specialist costs, but in other cases, give an example: the blogs that have Wordpress, there is a widget that is The author of the blog he sees that his readers interested. Do not press the button, also voted in its way.
Golden words.
These sites a lot [/QUOTE]
Tell me, please, just one, I am very interested.
I do not know how anyone else, but I have a word for equality (brotherhood, etc.) - an allergy. Equality has never been and never will be either in nature or in society. We are all different, to debate on equal terms is possible only by using the rules of good taste. I respect the author of this topic, because he was able to publicly say that I have read the book and could not understand it. And anyone who saw them, has the right to speak as he pleases [/QUOTE]
DSF, so that the artist must be ready - agrees. And the second part, probably not. Because, again, must be an element of tact (which, in principle, evidence of common courtesy). Strangely, what you talk about this, then you just express your opinion is very rare and always correct.

[SAH]

Сообщение от inquisitive

And do not try to turn the forum into an elite club for the elite of elite artists and art critics.
Many such sites,

Her, why do we elitism really. Long live the worker-peasant proletarian forum - Club artinvestment as you - feel better? (No offense) "I too join issue

Сообщение от iside

Tell me, please, just one, I am very interested.

[L-ana64110]

When voicing the views of the thin-ka is important is another question-
what purpose?
1. help thin-ku to see their mistakes
2.vyrazit its like-nenravitsya by philistine
3.izlit stagnant gall

In the first case it is better to write in a personal (if not lazy)
The second forum turns into a kitchen sittings with gossip
In the third - better in sports or drink tablets

I was furious. Hence, the moral need to give serious consideration to where to display their work, and, in each picture there is a buyer.

[Allena]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

one of my buyers refused to take a picture, referring to the views of "experts" in our forum.

Of course, it is unpleasant. But as once said at a forum Mister-y, "Examination of expertise, and need to have their brains. Golden words.

Where and who show the work, the author decides for himself, but the forum has the right to vote each. And the tact with which people can do it, only shows the level of his own upbringing.