In Kiev burned gallery Gudimova

[Самвел]

Сообщение от gans

but for the fact that represents the interests of people who want to discuss,

no problem with discussing, but not to do it publicly, is still alive a generation that just the sight of these items may fall faint from shame. Such things can not be discussed publicly. Could arrange a private showing, and nothing-would not have happened, who would like to discuss it, he came-to.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Samvel

no problem with discussing, but not to do it publicly, is still alive a generation that just the sight of these items may fall into a swoon of shame. Such things can not be discussed publicly. Could arrange a private showing, and nothing-would not have happened, who would like to discuss it, he came-to.

Yes, it's just not original and the art is not relevant. This is propaganda.

[Самвел]

I honestly do not know what it is. Like looking site, normal gallery, good artists are there, what was the point of this adventure. I think the organizers simply made a mistake, or ...., vobschem unclear.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Samvel

Like looking site, normal gallery, good artists are there, what was the point of this adventure.

That's right, something at once set fire to a train!

[Pavel]

Money, Samvel, all the money!

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Maroussia

That's right, something at once set fire to a train!
     

I think the organizers and instigators stand each other.

[Сергей Дородный]

Сообщение от gans

On the night of 30 September in Kiev burned gallery Gudimova Street Voloshskaya.
September 25, 2009 in Gallery I through III of literary and artistic festival Kiev barricade held debate propaganda of homosexuality or promoting tolerance? The meeting discussed the ban by the Ministry of Culture public kinoprokata comedy "Bruno" Sacha Baron Cohen

Horror as devoured me, this theme!
It even wanted to write "УЖОС as devoured.

The question I have so originated - and why the art gallery discusses socio-journalistic questions?

Is "tolerance", "homosexuality" - a visual-aesthetic category? It seems that the art galleries (and artists) must deal with something like the latter.
Malevich invented Suprematism, Picasso invented cubism (both about homosexuality have been aware of, I think), and contemporary artists and gallery owners have decided to show how the men each other fry. Innovators.

Well, I understand, everyone loves movies.
Everybody wants to Borat to see.
And always on the big screen.
Because no TV does not give that play of colors, subtle camera work, veil there just this great work.

 
None would discuss "The Impact of Luchino Visconti in the earlier films Antonioni, for example, if we do not like about Malevich pereteret (excuse me, and pulls on boratovsko-Bratkowski lexicon, but what I'm good, still playing hard for a fall).

No, the artistic elite (I think ours, Russia, and Ukrainian here differ little) can not be without borates and killing the bill.

Elite - an elite art. And elitist entertainment, I have Nero, I am the Emperor.

As long as people think they are artistic elite, will serve the public yellowness (or blue?) As contemporary art, there are still dozens of elites who find their elite action against such an elite art, and will benefit from this for a profit.

But artists, who for arson, too, was surprised. I thought the book burn-tapa stinks.

And the main thing for most is in the kicks - one gomov fotyat other lousy such intellectuals wet-PARTY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

[Posav]

Gallery and movies from Borat like different things. There are forces who want people reduced to a animal-like state, to demoralize him. A so-called contemporary art is an appendage of the force, like a bird which is picking his teeth of a crocodile. Here it is, contemporary art, and rehearsed. Well, and plus, scandalously need for PR.

[манна]

Сообщение от gans

People wanted to discuss the events of cultural life, cinema and literature. Not for nothing called, (and even more so to ensure that you describe) and tried to understand, especially for myself. And for that, got a pogrom! Yes it is an ordinary fascism. As discussed here?

    Absolutely agree.

[U-niks]

Yeah ... At the forum, half devoted Art'u are characters condoning arson art galleries. O, tempora ...