Artist Simon Faibisovich

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Samvel

So, dear forum users, artists must speak with respect, tolerance and without malice.

In my opinion, we are very cordial discussion. Try to understand that there is "photorealism". I feel no need to accept criticism as a kind of attack against the artist. Delve into the dirty clothes, of course, is unacceptable, but his work, due to the fact that it became public, it is permissible and even necessary to discuss. (Especially the whole line.) Why not? Above all, what would it be at the proper level. Otherwise, why bother to come to this forum.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Samvel

So, dear forum users, artists must speak with respect, tolerance and without malice.

Such a person automatically deserve respect! Even if he is wrong.

[Posav]

I personally it is more like a social art using the camera. Dominant social orientation and meaning. The exception may be the "bottle". As I understand it, just fotorealisty baldeyut from the exact realistic images or simulate color photographic images.

[Евгений]

"..... The spirit of the new ghetto felt Semen Faybisovich.Hudozhnik used old photographic method, a double exposure: one imprint projected two negative, and the combination of images gives a new effect. In the foreground - the capital of sewer manholes, and the second - Types of Everlasting City (or vice versa, who sees both). Hello from the gutters of the world - a world tourist postcards. But such a comparison is lost and powdered beauty of Rome, and the unique smell of Moscow's sewer network. And the aroma of the underground left, and glamor somehow failed. Neither Rome, nor the world ....."
Exhibition (MDP, 2004)
Source http://www.ng.ru/accent/2005-03-29/8_getto.html

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

I think Sherstyuk may be on the Internet?

Sherstyuk is in the Tretyakov Gallery.
Two things. Here's one fun-Diptych Research II. "Heavy levitation over the mountain Sokol, 1989, x /acrylic, 234,5 x 302.

To my shame, not asotsiiroval it so the artist Sergei Sherstyukov, perezhivschim his wife, actress Helen Mayorov exactly 9 months and died of stomach cancer. In 1998.

[Seriy]

I remember Sergei Sherstyuk-fotorealista. His paintings have fascinated and very sorry that he left so early.
I remember him slices of pumpkin in the Manege, penetrated by the sun, remember the pigeon in the Pushkin. The Internet can not find another, Sergei Sherstyuk obscured. And the pumpkins would glance up again, this time by today's eyes. I even eyeing them - 20 thousand dollars and were sold.

[Евгений]

Auction MacDougall `s. Author: Simon Faibisovich (£ 100-150 thousand)

[Евгений]

«№ 9" (series "One day at sunset.")
2011

Oil on canvas, mixed media, oil

150 x 200 cm, 59 1 /8 x 78 3 /4 in

(FAI-00 143)

Courtesy Regina Gallery, London & Moscow

--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------

http://www.reginagallery.com/node/1921

[Евгений]

Seeds catalog for the exhibition Faibisovich THREE-IN-ONE [/URL]
 "The answer to the challenge of time," the artist calls his new film. She painted over the printed canvas pictures taken on mobile phone. "Three in one" - the name of this exhibition.

Passers-by, passing cars, mysterious shadows on the wall - Faibisovich interested in everything that surrounds every day each of us. He does not staged shots, he catches a moment. After shooting the artist handles frames in a graphics program, brings to the canvas and paints over the image with oil paints. But surprise, not only texture, but also composition. Three-part form of the draft three years. "One day at sunset," "Three's triptych" and "Again subway."

The latter occupies a large part of the exhibition. "Again" - because they have something in common with the paintings created by the author of a quarter century ago, the Moscow Metro Lenin. According to Seeds Faibisovich, he was interested after all these years, once again descend into the subway and take pictures of people. Only this time he introduced a completely new, contemporary look at the capital's residents.

Добавлено через 16 минут
Simon Faibisovich, "Biennale of Contemporary sludge"
Interesting article, wonderful, talented artist .. (EA)
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------
"... In a civilized society today is not the art that create a contemporary, if not from him, that offers new means and forms of expression ..."
I will not lie, he visited all the exposure of the Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art, but mostly in Artplay, examined. The feeling that somewhere is already, did not leave. Such a feeling, as I recall, pursued in the Soviet stagnation in the exhibitions in the Arena or the House of Artists at the Kuznetsk bridge. Only there déjà vu arises because the official art of the elephant trampling the commonplaces of "real art", but here because the authors very often used recipes from an old cookbook of postmodernism. Why is it so? Like stated theme of the current Biennale, on the contrary - look to the future, where all the artistic creativity, by Peter Weibel, invited the chief curator, based on computer technology. Among the exhibits of this kind is very interesting, very little or even amusing, but the feeling of the main exhibition are array of projects that trigger deja vu. If one of the main tasks of the exposition - to take as much space, not quality, so many to support the illusion that the post-modern lives and wins. That, as the custom since the 1980s, nothing but irony and mockery, nothing serious, but aggression. No, God forbid, plastic's message, even if it is based on digital technology, there is no appeal to the eyes as sensory organs. Well, the painting cost, as now adopted: hang something unintelligible in zakutochke. This is hopeless, worthless - look sick. And not because this depends what the world will not make a good painting, but because its so and pick up. Would you like modern art? Please! You see, it sucks: and for our conceptions of it can not keep up, and our installations is not a marker.
Read more:

[Евгений]

Interesting article, wonderful, talented artist .. (EA)
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------
Simon Faibisovich, "Biennale of Contemporary sludge"
"... In a civilized society today is not the art that create a contemporary, if not from him, that offers new means and forms of expression ..."
I will not lie, he visited all the exposure of the Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art, but mostly in Artplay, examined. The feeling that somewhere is already, did not leave. Such a feeling, as I recall, pursued in the Soviet stagnation in the exhibitions in the Arena or the House of Artists at the Kuznetsk bridge. Only there déjà vu arises because the official art of the elephant trampling the commonplaces of "real art", but here because the authors very often used recipes from an old cookbook of postmodernism. Why is it so? Like stated theme of the current Biennale, on the contrary - look to the future, where all the artistic creativity, by Peter Weibel, invited the chief curator, based on computer technology. Among the exhibits of this kind is very interesting, very little or even amusing, but the feeling of the main exhibition are array of projects that trigger deja vu. If one of the main tasks of the exposition - to take as much space, not quality, so many to support the illusion that the post-modern lives and wins. That, as the custom since the 1980s, nothing but irony and mockery, nothing serious, but aggression. No, God forbid, plastic's message, even if it is based on digital technology, there is no appeal to the eyes as sensory organs. Well, the painting cost, as now adopted: hang something unintelligible in zakutochke. This is hopeless, worthless - look sick. And not because this depends what the world will not make a good painting, but because its so and pick up. Would you like modern art? Please! You see, it sucks: and for our conceptions of it can not keep up, and our installations is not a marker.
Read more: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=139681