Artist Simon Faibisovich

[Samvel]

Сообщение от Pavel

I'm completely serious. I looked thought and came to the conclusion that quite well.

1987. travel was in Moscow. My friend, writer, journalist Semyon Livshits, suggested going to visit, I am not familiar artist S. Faibisovich. He arranged a meeting, but could not come, and I went to one of the guests. We sat with the artist viewed his paintings, drank and talked about art. My first impression of his paintings, was a disappointment, I did not take the pictures drawn by the endless bottles (sitting at home on Maroseika, and had little pictures), but when they started, really was having and he began explaining to me, I gradually realized that I was dealing not with an ordinary artist and a person who was not so easy to understand, and need a special level of knowledge and understanding of painting, to penetrate into his art. This meeting was decisive for my future collectibles.
So, dear forum users, artists must speak with respect, tolerance and without malice.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Samvel

So, dear forum users, artists must speak with respect, tolerance and without malice.

In my opinion, we are very cordial discussion. Try to understand that there is "photorealism". I feel no need to accept criticism as a kind of attack against the artist. Delve into the dirty clothes, of course, is unacceptable, but his work, due to the fact that it became public, it is permissible and even necessary to discuss. (Especially the whole line.) Why not? Above all, what would it be at the proper level. Otherwise, why bother to come to this forum.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Samvel

So, dear forum users, artists must speak with respect, tolerance and without malice.

Such a person automatically deserve respect! Even if he is wrong.

[Posav]

I personally it is more like a social art using the camera. Dominant social orientation and meaning. The exception may be the "bottle". As I understand it, just fotorealisty baldeyut from the exact realistic images or simulate color photographic images.

[Евгений]

"..... The spirit of the new ghetto felt Semen Faybisovich.Hudozhnik used old photographic method, a double exposure: one imprint projected two negative, and the combination of images gives a new effect. In the foreground - the capital of sewer manholes, and the second - Types of Everlasting City (or vice versa, who sees both). Hello from the gutters of the world - a world tourist postcards. But such a comparison is lost and powdered beauty of Rome, and the unique smell of Moscow's sewer network. And the aroma of the underground left, and glamor somehow failed. Neither Rome, nor the world ....."
Exhibition (MDP, 2004)
Source http://www.ng.ru/accent/2005-03-29/8_getto.html