Продам: Charming

[uriart]

heir, sorry, did not pay attention.

[Сергеич]

I know whose portrait it is!

- You know, gentlemen, who is it?

The voice, which he said it, implied in itself is something amazing, so that made cry all at the same time:
- Who?
- This, ladies and gentlemen, my good sir, is none other than Captain Kopeikin!

In this situation better than the classic answer is difficult.

[fross]

Сообщение от Allena

Do not want to interfere in the discussion, but I found it interesting that: the word "SPECIAL" seems to me can mean staying in the work of some special depositories. Perhaps the author was arrested, and the work was confiscated. Perhaps not the author, and the model, if it is a real person, but I think that after all the author. Why Spetskhran, rather than destruction? I do not know.

Сообщение от Fordochka

I would add that on the back of immetsya stamp, blurred blue, inv number 68, and the date of 31.03.1962

All did not 38 th.

[Allena]

stamp, vague blue, inv number 68, and the date of 31.03.1962

Fordochka, dig the history of existence. Restore the stamp, learn, how could appear the word "special". If you continue to adhere to your version of Akhmatova (I, like all of us, too, think it is wrong), then look for evidence of provenance. Perhaps you are waiting for discovery!

[fross]

Сообщение от Fordochka

But I guess ... I'm not a historian ... and I have not studied her work, I want to know who is depicted ..... and who the author ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
.. of human beauty for centuries arguing !!!!!!!... now Monaliza .... Is beauty ????? and who said that Anna was a beauty ... ??
And my question is not about ....

I think the memoirs N. M. describes the reaction of Akhmatova's article, which questioned whether it was her beauty, and then she began to collect their photos. Probably foresaw that Fordochka and you will not believe

April 27, 1914 in a letter to the BV Anrep NV Nedobrovo wrote: "Simply beautiful name it is impossible, but it looks so interesting that it is worth making Leonardo's drawing and geynsborovsky oil portrait, and above all, put it in a very meaningful place a mosaic depicting the world of poetry. In the fall, came here, I I think you will not refuse from any of these problems.

By your Stranger seems such problems does not set. To believe that this has anything to do with Akhmatova impossible, under any circumstances and in no time.

[uriart]

Fordochka, Is Akhmatova was urodkoy?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Fordochka

Rosu help identify the author of Charming (assuming that it Anaa Akhmatova Kazan period of life ?????)

Nothing in common in the structure of a person with Akhmatova here. It's just a sketch, sketch and not very successfully arranged ...

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Fordochka

Please help identify the author of Charming (assuming that this is Anna Akhmatova, Kazan period of life ?????)

Fastest is again the work of the student learning the art school and not very Assertive. Course 3.

[Фордочка]

The student then good: in this work is stamped and Inv. №, date

[color="# 666686"]Added after 14 minutes[/color]
This picture Well ..... And it also does not seem to you submit pictures ..... I do not insist on anything ...... I would like to guess, tk apparently stereotype reasoning is very strong in art, and art is what do the rare human specimens: they are doing, while others excel in the criticism ...

[uriart]

Fordochka, not teshte in the hope!
Painting just awful!
Aunt - urodka!
Print, sign and date the back does not give any hope of improvement.