The sixties?

[mihailovoh]

Сообщение от camertus

from the beginning I did not believe in the signature.
but see the professionalism of execution Studies.
and I understand that it is 1960 - 1970.
The time in which I am not strong.
Therefore inquirers.

According mne.net here professinalizma.etyud n \\ x. Huge public kolichestvo.I to "the sixties" or what side

[тата]

Сообщение от IV

acetate, the case is still in the fact that for themselves Tyshler sixties was a very important figure . It is much more intimate than the " Leningrad ", " the Circle ", etc.

So , although it is not the sixties , but consider it out of context shestideyasyatnichestva , in my opinion , it is impossible .

Naturally , the basic sixties - it Muscovites , and in Peter Sterligov 's who may well be counted among the sixties . It was a question of co - Tyshler to or not , definitely not. Then there should be and Romanovich and Fonvizena also probably be significant figures in the context of contemporary art history research. Incidentally honest scale figure T - pa and the value of his work in the light of the sixties is unknown to me . I know that young artists loved A. Labasa than 60 not - for , the same themes of 30th and not a portrait or a farmer's tractor , only close relatives sometimes the actors (by the way friends).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от acetate

You explained why Tyshler to 60 . So it 's strange to consider them .

Will clarify one important thing: I did not explain that Tyshler - " the sixties ," I do not even have never written, I just admitted that the question

Сообщение от camertus; 2771201 "

the sixties ?

on this picture and references to A. Tischler in the contest of "the Sixties " is acceptable .

Just in case , here are all ( without it) my posts in this thread - 1; 2; 4; 5; 7; 8.

[тата]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Where is his work in the 40- 50's you could see ?

Probably all of his understanding .
And , by the way , why, for example , animals and Yakovlev or Nemuhin and Yankilevsky - " the sixties "?
Ask yourself this question , and perhaps after this, and a little something extra about Tischler understand. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

To the question " Do Tyshler the sixties ? " The answer is " YES , and then ....... that was not present , (incidentally exposed , nor as no less than other artists, and even more, for example Sokolova , Safronova and Drevins and B. Golopolosov at all if I'm not mistaken until the end of the 90s never) . How old were listed artists in the 60's right, thirty years on , and they made a new skill , such as never was , another thing that is clear is not the first in the world, but that's another matter . a work Tischler can be seen at the Museum of private Collections , so here are more than two dozen - the whole room. there are very similar in the story, as two drops of water , the difference in painting but in 30-40 years time. With this said, the new artist in the 60's ? Chagall lived even more.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, working in the theater since the 30's, Tyshler until the "thaw" and almost did not show his easel paintings in public.

 
<! - ~ 7 ~ -> Affirmative particle "yes" in my post applies to the following words about the work of Tischler and no more.
There could be no " f it ".
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[тата]

I totally agree.
But the phrase about the fantastical world of illusions - good.
It will be necessary to put into practice.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tata

But the phrase about the fantastical world of illusions - is good.

And how she, by the way.
This is exactly my line.
I confess that I do not remember that.

[тата]

Yes, in my opinion about Polenova, who recently exhibited it.
And who is 100 thousand and the western auction, such as easy to obtain.
You have examples of low-cost sales Polenova posted.
Similarly, your phrase, in one fell swoop all characterized.
Very pleased.

Added after 13 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

How did she, by the way.
This is exactly my line.
I confess that I do not remember this.

I'm sorry, it was about Meshersky.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от tata

it was about Meshersky.

And, understood and found it.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Well, why did you enter the owner of such applications in the area of ​​fantastic illusions?
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Алек Сандер]

Сообщение от acetate

A Tischler work can be seen at the Museum of Private Collections , so here are more than two dozen - the whole room. There are very similar to the story, as two drops of water , the difference in painting but in 30-40 years time. That said, this new artist in the 60's ? Chagall lived even more .

Make out on the proposals (1, 2 and final part )

1. More than two dozen works by the artist - this is sheer nonsense . Exhibited at the Museum of Private Collections Tischler give very little idea of ​​his work , especially his development. With the same success can be judged on the work of the same Chagall , twenty or thirty works , half of which - the schedule. And Picasso can be twenty to thirty works (you can skip item 2 and a smooth transition to the third paragraph .)

2 . You apparently really bad fancy work of Alexander Tischler . For those 30-40 years with him there were very big metamorphosis. Tyshler twenties and thirties and Tyshler the sixties and seventies - are completely different artists . Varies and technology, and the style and vision of the world . To claim otherwise can only person who knew him only one hall in the Museum of Private Collections .

3 . What did Tyshler new? It's nothing. And the step that you mention it, said nothing new in his long life . He sat on a ridge ( the cow ) and even went . Once you indiscriminately , stroke one size fits all ... The artist opens his style and develop it further . The problem is the same - to open the most " obvious ", " so simple " , "many - artists - as - can " style , which will be in tune with the times and all that no one will be able to repeat , because a) he can not, b) will be secondary.

The bottom line - in simplicity, but not all artists can find this very easy . Simplicity - the inheritance of genius.

I can not vouch for the absolute accuracy of the quote ( too lazy to look ), but Tyshler once said : "I was always accused me of writing the same background . So, I have never in my life did not write the same background ." Perhaps he had seen a little more than yours?

Vladimir Yakovlev also entirely flowers all my life , " daub " ... But what !