Copyright recurrence

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от dedulya37

And what people thought about "repetition" and "variant" pictures?

The painting was done in 2002 godu.Orest V. Sleshinsky very fond of this place, near rasrolozhena his dacha. Bleached paint the end of August gave a landscape which is primitive - this time just passed by the artist. I think in the collection of SAN There is such a landscape, was written earlier and probably in the spring or early summer - colors brighter. I would say is two versions of one scene. And that's not the case. Director thin. Salon invited visitors interested in creativity S. Zhalobnyuka pack of photos of his works-Book, like what is written in the right for you formate.Posle that I do not buy his work.

[Pavel]

It asks again, yes, they do not understand. Asked to repeat in order to buy? Exhibitions must demonstrate achievement and demostriruyut mediocrity. Just came out of this school level to the exhibition will not get, so nevydelyalsya. Repetitions, variants, kompelyatsii is something that destroys the artistry makes a craft, like everyone else. No, an all-time on quality in art or art or not. Of course you can buy if you want to throw money. Terms of fans is very narrow and all the floats and the most unsuitable moment.
Those sold at auction in Britain repeats fastest arrive here in Russia, ktoto smoshennichal.Sovetsky style is popular in the west, but they know how long you to use Akun etal. spravochnikami.so all frauds are familiar with all detstva.Bystree ktoto realized that it cheated and shake off this stuff, but then someone bought into both the avant-garde, buyout in the west and is now worthless entire collections are sold here.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

both the avant-garde, buyout in the west and is now worthless entire collections are sold here.

Here in this place, if possible, more detail, please.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Pavel

Those sold at auction in Britain repeats fastest arrive here in Russia, ktoto swindled

So repetitions or fake? If repetitions, there was no fraud there.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Pavel, ... who is swindled, who bought into it, who then realized that cheated - it's a song about the Soviet militia from the television show "The investigation leading experts." Specific and especially about the "avant-garde buyout in the west worthless, and now entire collections are sold here. "

[Жар-птица]

I absolutely know for sure that a painting "In the pool," repetition is stored in a private collection in Moscow, have her try on the size ....

[Yaya]

SergeiSK, I think this whole controversy can be solved only time. moreover, selective approach to the creativity of each individual artist. Claude Monet wrote a few dozen "lily" and they are now priceless

[LCR]

Сообщение от Yaya

SergeiSK, I think this whole controversy can be solved only time. moreover, selective approach to the creativity of each individual artist. Claude Monet wrote a few dozen "lily" and they are now priceless

I do not think that the work of a series of "lily" can - and should - be considered copyright repetitions. And then "Rouen Cathedral" will be included in that category, and only then to self-portraits of Van Gogh would get

Copyright repeat - all the same copy with very minor modifications.

[kropotkina-o]

The size of it 117h117 cm, and at 82h82, see Sotheby's came to the conclusion that, at Sotheby's to sell or a fake, but this is not holding this picture, hard to judge, or a reduction in the author's re-run

SergeiSK, covershenno agree with you. Variant Sotheby's rather a strain on me (slightly) the quality of painting, although it should be noted for Gerasimov, especially in the later period, a lot of careless, somewhere, even clumsy things (but it is clear that only geniuses like Titian knew how to turn physical infirmity into a new word in art). My subjective взляд more warps this Feshin Kristi.S with one hand I understand that, having in mind the size, it can be a study for the work of the Russian Museum. But where other counterparts? And in the past at Christie held a lot of incomprehensible things. which is now the work, which initially sold as Korovin, and a couple of years attributed to Korovin

[Артём]

Сообщение от kropotkina-o

Yes, and in the past at Christie held a lot of incomprehensible things. which is now the work, which initially sold as Korovin, and a couple of years attributed to Korovin

     At Korovina little similar, but it's nice to look at the creative search!