"FESTNAIV-2010"

[таша]

Сообщение от Seriy

A naivschiki type Vasey Lozhkina, Victor Puzo had before?
http://vasya-lozhkin.livejournal.com/223665.html

Seriy, I think it's naive to none at all otnoscheniya not even a stretch.

Added after 26 minutes

Сообщение от Fed

A story about the outsider and the photos will be?

Museum of Outsider Art, this time not to participate, and work themselves outsiders do not provide (as outsiders). Only from private collections if. Here Romanenkov outsider, to the same class. Alexander Lobanov was or not, I do not know. Lobanov looked-was.

Сообщение от Par-I; 1446441"

I want to mention two graphic sheet Bobrova EM

Too much.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Tasha

Seriy, I think it's naive to none at all otnoscheniya no,

And why.
Tasha?


On what grounds then do you define contemporary naive?

For me and your work is largely covered by a naive ...

[Seriy]

IMHO, Lozhkin, Puzo and others make a real modern splint 21 centuries, and they do not write in the 21 th century popular print the 19 th century, like many others, pretending that in the 21 century, no Internet. The popularity of paintings Lozhkina huge, one post with his picture looks ten thousand people. Commercial success too.
Images Lozhkina-Russian bear, rabbit, cat. And he really does not need sophisticated izopriemy, composition and color - the genre requires. Many also cited the efforts of the authors with whom they are stuffing Matisse in the framework of the genre popular print the 19 th century, a concern for the genre, T e for the sincerity of expression.

[таша]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 1447561"

And why. Tasha?

On what grounds then do you define contemporary naive?

NATA NOVA, because (this is my opinion) are really naive artist is almost always very serious in his work, sometimes to the pain and anguish. Therefore, creates what forces do not remain silent, I want to splash out, share the joy, beauty, or vice versa. Irony and sarcasm is misplaced, and if there is genuinely good-that-is. Well, the very form-naive tries simply had not obtained properly. It is not easy, not stylized, purposely coarse form, it-yourself ease and the good. As one poet said: "It's good that I am, and not any other."
About me-I do not attach themselves . Although a lot of my early works in the Museum of Outsider Art, I understand that do not quite fit in ramki.No, I think it's for the best. There is a backlash for the development, do not match the style. (I do not like match )

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy

Many also cited the efforts of the authors with whom they are stuffing Matisse in the framework of the genre popular print the 19 th century, a concern for the genre, T e for the sincerity of expression.
__________________

Consonant with the feelings ...

Сообщение от Tasha, 1447581

) is really naive artist is almost always very serious in his work, sometimes to the pain and anguish. Therefore, creates what forces do not remain silent, I want to splash out, share the joy, beauty, or vice versa. Irony and sarcasm is misplaced

And is historically and irony and sarcasm were not part of the national lawsuit Islands?

Сообщение от Tasha, 1447581

Well, the very form-naive tries simply had not obtained properly. It is not easy, not stylized, purposely coarse form, it-s easy and so good.

Such little .. Basically the "simplicity" cultured .. (put on stream and very successful)

[таша]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

But is historically and irony and sarcasm were not part of the national action-va?

NATA NOVA, Folk Art, splint and naive are two different things, in my opinion

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от "NATA NOVA

Such a little .. Basically the" simplicity "cultured .. (set on a stream and highly successful)

Wow.

Сообщение от "Seriy

The popularity of paintings Lozhkina huge, one post with his picture viewing dozens of thousand people.
Commercial success also has.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Tasha

NATA NOVA, Folk Art, splint and naive are two different things, in my opinion

I understand: splint, naive and folk art (as you) are different things?

[таша]

NATA NOVA, Yeah, sure.
Folk art and popular print is one thing, naive and primitive other.
Although I may be wrong, I'm no expert, I'd rather be inside.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от ProstoFeya

alerted that there was no opening of cameras and reporters.

You know, if not invite, then there is nothing to be surprised. I once wrote a letter to take photos in the museum of naive art. So nothing came of it. From the contact people, much depends. And the exhibition is very good, much better than Festnaiv-2007. Rare stuff 60-x-70's ... very cool.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Vladimir

You know, if not invite, then there is nothing to be surprised.

Absolutely right! Like it was in response to a surprise dupes lack of reporters and TV cameras to say taunt to the organizers, but then changed her mind and decided that they just have to thank for what they could do such a festival, and experience to promote their activities - come with time.