Sergey Bocharov Versace or without pants!

[operator]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

To you it is interesting-check.


I am not interested in his painting all.

Why Kirril!? Because of his patriotic views? Be honest with yourself at least - you've already spent almost a day to study Bocharova with lots of quotations from his interviews but also (which I myself had not seen it) and now in the bushes.
Leave his views alone - you just descendants - imagine that this painting has written Vasya Pupkin and let's break the old school of painting on the merits. It's VERY BEAUTIFULLY!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от operator

Because of his patriotic views?

But what sort of More "views"?

Сообщение от operator

You have already spent almost a day to study Bocharova with lots of quotations from his interviews but also (which I myself had not seen) and now in the bushes.

I am not "studied" , there is nothing to learn, I amused myself by reading "background notes" a la Ivan Khlestakov, an official from St. Petersburg.
About the painting will not speak, I when I do not like, just keep quiet, "the artist's hurt easily" ...

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от operator

It's VERY BEAUTIFULLY!

Here and watch. Watch and enjoy.

[operator]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

About the painting will not speak, I when I do not like, just keep quiet, "the artist's hurt easily" ...

It's what your - about the "easily offended" - you surely noticed!

But I was even a series of controversial works like Bocharova but not much (where they hang it? - Only history will judge all) - it is like a boiled potato to watch Glazunov, Shilov, Nikas Safronov, etc. and here tablespoon horseradish hearty .. Ooops! and taste (oh .. visual) ritseptory cleaned and live not so boring.

Way Nikas same loves shocking but politically correct. In photo draws celebrities and then when the opportunity presents work and makes the photo with her and the star as a souvenir popiaritsya further.

But the landscapes and portraits Bocharova MUCH I like! Classic old masters!

[LCR]

Сообщение от operator

But the landscapes and portraits Bocharova VERY I like! Classic old masters!

As to spoon a hearty horseradish you're right - in the sense that the work of your Bocharova really lousy

As for the classics, let alone the old masters, Bocharovskaya products do not have to do with him not the slightest relationship (do not believe me - ask Apollinaire!).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Here's a LCR as the wife of the artist has a moral right to give her husband's colleagues objective assessment - ->.

[SAH]

Сообщение от operator

again subektivizm - but it also must be at least as a SOUND!

Should not. You expressed your opinion, you arranged the forum - you responded said their opinion and all. If you are not ready to believe that you are not satisfied with it do not put in public. At least no more of those ridiculous-laudatory history shows, even where not passed.

[Tana]

Сообщение от operator

So whose horror of it - this is your fear of his position, or - you have decided to just come up with an anonymous quote!? Read the forum on his site - there are many quotations - reviews!

And since you like to tell that they were in Monaco at the palace - as would cling to the blue-blooded! But those who ordered the work seems to live there and they themselves are not their own "just like marble! Ridiculous!

operator if you do not understand my first tip about painting S. Bocharov, clarify, it is this very low level and it does not even need to read his biography, where and from whom he learned, but who orders him to work that he studied believe, but the result did not work (you know, it's like a student, which failed ekazmen said, well, I also taught!).

As for the level of the palace in Monaco and the exhibits in it, I think I can fully judge, because they hold a candle to no good in comparison with the Louvre, Buckingham Palace, House of Rothschild in the UK (the list goes on).
P.S. referring to the palace in Monaco, I would say that was struck taste of its inhabitants, truly disappointed.

[Konstantin]

Combined.

The first discussion was seen, but already forgotten.
Well, let, once the exhibition of the artist, remember.


I wonder now with Vysotsky can anyone buy?
And what had already bought .

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Konstantin

I'm not talking about the level of art, but about the content of the picture. Why the artist decided that the death of Vladimir Vysotsky blame Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Andrei Voznesensky, Bella Akhmadulina, Bulat Okudzhava, Eldar Ryazanov, Dementiev?

Really, Constantine, I think you attach too much significance to these ravings. If a man writes nonsense on paper (see discussion above), then why should we take seriously his ravings on the canvas? They are, in my opinion, that does not deserve

[Flora]

on the poet Appolinaire said: "Well what is there to be surprised - he's Russian!" Artists exchanged portraits.
Grand Picasso signed his painting: the Best of my favorite painter of the Soviet Union. "

..................................................
..................................................
...........


Guillaume Apollinaire died 1918.