Mistrust of the Internet

[Ninni]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

The distinction between plagiarism and citation is very thin. Perhaps this woman is strongly influenced by Ben Hashanah. Personally, I like to find in the paintings of subtle allusions to predshestvennnikov.

Here, even that is not the case - (where no citation and attribution) that I placed for a visual aid - has placed it-that was at hand - the case in Veterans creativity.

Сообщение от Meister

boy is clearly modeled in detail, it may be a case of so ordered.

  You know, this is a rather short-sighted so afraid of the Internet.

Completely agree with you - "Wolves are afraid of - not walk in the woods" ... but to make stronger moves in the direction of the artist - I think it should. At least talk about it and blame thieves. This site is quite popular and views of the participants think is important.

[Meister]

Сообщение от Ninni

At least talk about it and blame thieves. This site is quite popular and views of the participants think is important.

very correct idea! examples abound. and hearing in this market has spread very rapidly, so that the life crooks oh how can we spoiled!

[таша]

Сообщение от Ninni

Here even that is not the case - (where no citation and attribution) that I placed for a visual aid - has placed it-that was at hand - the case in Veterans creativity.

I think that in a work of art is a special spirit and energy that distinguish the original from the "variations on a theme." And in order to protect their creative enough in the same web host as much information about the works, including the date of creation. So to say, "priority post" But on the other hand, in the history of art will not the one who first did something, but whoever had the most talented. Benefits from the "at loggerheads with interesting pictures, mostly one-sell. Art by the original artist did not suffer. It is as if someone is selling posters of your work without your consent. And Nehaj, I like all the same.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

someone Leporskaya

Someone Leporskaya: http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/761/biography.html

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Leporskaya pupil of Malevich, so it is not plagiarism, and development issues.

How is it they say: "A good student must surpass the teacher." Looking at Leporskii, I think that a student was ill, or the teacher is not good. And do not gang up on me once, he says, called the Great Malevich bad! Often the great experts and masters absolutely can not teach. A mediocre professionals - are great teachers. To that issued the nature of the award.
And it has developed? Just repeat.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Allena

Someone Leporskaya

For me it is really "someone". It is not interesting to me, she is one of the many millions, although it hangs next to the teacher in the State Tretyakov Gallery. They are often confused, if not look at the card with the inscription. She does not have its own person, judging by these pictures. Perhaps then she drew something interesting - perhaps, who will?
I confess I am not a big fan, and Kazimir Malevich.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 11 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Ninni

Here even that is not the case - (where no citation and attribution) that I placed for a visual aid - has placed it-that was at hand

  I think you are a little vain hurt the artist. In the above example, you are not so much plagiarism, than in my example of Leporskii-Malevich.

Сообщение от Ninni

the case to the Veterans of creativity.

This work is always perfectly protected.
Often the artist is unable to repeat the work. Of course, if we are talking about art or graphics, rather than on the conceptual installation.

[Ninni]

Originally Posted by Chernomashentsev Vladimir

  I think you are a little vain hurt the artist.

Offended me ?????..... Perhaps those that are not announced the name?
  I do not intend here to prove anything - who does not want to see - not see.

This work is always perfectly protected.

   The issue is very controversial in many aspects.

Often, the artist himself is unable to repeat the work.

   Of course, because the first establishing - an artist driven by passion, the birth of a new impetus and inspiration and to repeat it all dies but plagiarism is the first "inspiration" for the leadership.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Originally Posted by tasha
I think that in a work of art is a special spirit and energy that distinguish the original from the "variations on the theme".

  There is no doubt but few can catch him and feel.

And in order to protect their creative enough in the same web host as much information about the works, including the date of creation. So to say, "priority post"

  Maybe ... version for thought

[манна]

Сообщение от Meister

These lovers can go up and to the exhibition, where photographs taken liked work, and then her home safely overwrite.

   But most likely a copyist would go to an exhibition in your city (Country), where and by then selling and where more likely to fall for this. From this perspective, the Internet is more convenient for them. But still have internet more pluses in my opinion.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

And here lack of confidence in the Internet. The artist must "vystalyatsya in gallereyah.Delat exhibition personal or edinomyshlennikami.Tolko in communicating with people" live "you can find out their attitude towards this painting.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Ninni

As you know - smoke without fire and with caution of course, as artists have their own, valid reasons.

Remembering about suspicious loans remembered this post Igor Markin, "okryvshego" schedule Alexandra Yulikova: http://community.livejournal.com/art4ru/127637.html and Nick internet then a trace was not

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Tasha

It's like if someone is selling posters of your work without your consent. And Nehaj, I like all the same.

But I do not care.