Tsvetkova, or not?

[uriart]

Mr y, these experts (Bychkov and others like her!), So to speak, so write that ears wilt!

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от uriart

Mr y, these experts (Bychkov and others like her!), So to speak, so write that ears wilt!

Gentlemen There is an idea!
And what if together under a separate topic in the list of names of experts that issued notoriously dubious or even false attribution?
To call him if not a "black list", then at least "gray."
To the people knew their heroes on the one hand, and the characters - warning, chemical documents.

Constantine, admin.! As you look at it?

[Yaya]

Eriksson, you seem to proceed from the fact that you, in Stockholm, the court will not have to go: p: p: p

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Eriksson

And what if together under a separate topic in the list of names of experts that issued notoriously dubious or even false attribution?
To call him if not a "black list", then at least "gray".

I am pleased to lay out a couple of reputable securities issued by 100%falshaki ...: D: D: D

[Артём]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Gentlemen There is an idea!
And what if together under a separate topic in the list of names of experts that issued notoriously dubious or even false attribution?
To call him if not a "black list", then at least "gray."
To the people knew their heroes on the one hand, and the characters - warning, chemical documents.

Probably - it is not very correct rubanut like this people. There is another proposal, to make people (art critics), who really knew the artist's work or were close to the family of the artist and who can give independent, but at least 99%of the assessment of the product!
For its part, can start and say that Elena Samoilova (art) really knew the family Zakharov and V. Tsvetkov.

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Artem

I guess - it is not very correct rubanut like this people.

I do not know ... when the judge wrote that ... (I'm talking about the estimate) ... there is not "wither ears" and the tears flow ....

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Yaya

Eriksson, you seem to proceed from the fact that you, in Stockholm, the court will not have to go: p: p: p

That is, in separate communications "slander" on expert can be, but the list - can not?: Shy:
And then - what the court should we be afraid?
This is not the forum participants to write the conclusion falshaki,
and experts.

[Konstantin]

We certainly think about it, but how to approach it is not clear. Well when the forum participants will be called the obvious grief experts, but when will not it obvious? But will those who will be the final authority? We administration? Anonymous forum participants? Simply do the opposite, to name those who do not lie. And according to directions. For example: a specialist in 19 century Russia name.
But in this case, if someone writes saying no, and this name is lyapy what to do? There may in fact deliberately vilify.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Put on the contrary to do, to call those who do not lie.

I'm not lying. Meaning? (as argued by some forum users): p: D

[Konstantin]

I'm not lying. Meaning?

About you are not talking, we know who you are and it is quite another matter.
A lie, in the sense of fair negotiate an expert can be for various reasons:
- From vengeance (not given a positive conclusion on falshak)
- Due to the bad relations.

I personally know of cases where a respected and Ciosny expert says about another distinguished and Chesney, that he was a complete ignoramus, and an ignoramus. And what to do?