Tsvetkova, or not?
 

Dear Sirs, Please help us, to decide to work. Tsvetkova 50-ies, or someone subscribed to it.

Provenance work there? If you work 50-ies, and the recently-signed can be seen immediately, apply (in darkness) ultraviolet flashlight. (Worth a penny) all will be seen at once, a fresh sign or not.
This is a start.

At work there are experts zaklyuchenie.Podpis plotted simultaneously with the execution of work and graphically comparable to the author's samples, but that it smuschaet.U I can not compare this work with other works Tsvetkova this period.

I'm sure it Tsvetkova. Although photo and grade are not very good, but that slight negligence with nothing can not be confused. In Yalta, these works I've seen. If you can show a couple of fragments in a good field and a signature. I have an opportunity sravnit.V 50-s her signature is slightly different from this. She could finish the job later and sign it. And what was on the back side?

Halavk, is easy to lay out an expert opinion?

I have my doubts about this work. Lay lyapy in painting, such as upper lilac written as a fence of equal size. Tsvetkov was a pro.
Here the work of that period.

This forgery.: Confused:

Go on expert opinion and a signature.

Here and compare signatures.

Go on a few more fragments.