Help evaluate the picture, signing "Harlamov 1870" - Страница 3 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

vyadem · 21.06.2009, 10:22

Cyril Syzransky, that's the book handy

Кирилл Сызранский · 21.06.2009, 10:24

Цитата:

Сообщение от vyadem

that's the book handy

Without books anywhere.

"Knowledge is power"!

[color="# 666686"]Added 2 hours 57 minutes[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK

The handbook Solovieva is a sample of such a signature Kharlamova from work in 1875.

Especially now, reached for Solovyov and looked.
He has given a signature 75-year, but there is the letter "a" a capital, rather than printed. And the letter "X", "L", "m"-other.
In a scientific catalog are 26 signatyur Kharlamova in color. And only one such sign 70-year and it was with this picture.
This author very little paintings after his departure to Paris in 69-m signed in Cyrillic. Usual signature-"Harlamoff" with a date or without.

олег назаров · 21.06.2009, 13:28

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK

commissioned by the Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III. Ie The Draw products

absolutely sure that the same ....

Василий50 · 21.06.2009, 20:37

For example, the picture is phototypes and lottery products, the question: what was the draw? this is why there is no mention anywhere else? And the size of my paintings 46,5 x 54,0 but the catalog 60,2 x 50,5

K-Maler · 22.06.2009, 02:50

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

The museum's copy in 1913, apparently. Hence, the embossed stamp of the museum.

I had an old postcard with this picture. A copy may watercolor ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 16 minutes[/color]

Цитата:

Сообщение от SergeiSK

I think that this is not a lithograph,

With an increase is not similar to lithography, which always has a resemblance to the picture, but here is visible brush spots like watercolor.

SergeiSK · 22.06.2009, 08:31

Цитата:

Сообщение от K-Maler

With an increase is not similar to lithography, which always has a resemblance to the picture, but here is visible brush spots like watercolor.

Agree. But the same phototype, the prototype of modern photographs, can clearly pass all shades, stains and some other nuances.
In general, you, Vasiliy50, we must show that the work of specialists "live", that they have identified equipment. For photos to distinguish from watercolor lithograph can be difficult. Well, really, after all this becomes clear value and price of your work.

Василий50 · 23.06.2009, 17:56

Was an expert. At otiske found the word "picture Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III"
What may be its cost?

SergeiSK · 23.06.2009, 20:23

Цитата:

Сообщение от Vasiliy50

What may be its cost?

Such things are sometimes sold on online auction hammer. Ask the price there. I think that the price in the region of $ 100-200. Here are some examples, though not entirely accurate, your picture better than them:
http://molotok.ru/item668582442_suri..._30na40sm.html
http://molotok.ru/item667197500_russ...tografiya.html
http://molotok.ru/item668583199_shal...a_filyara.html
http://molotok.ru/item668583886_russ..._30na38sm.html
http://molotok.ru/item655700311_lito..._rod_1860.html
http://molotok.ru/item667516835_nest..._35na44sm.html

vyadem · 13.07.2009, 23:59

and as such a surprise to you?
leafing through auktsionniki Antique-cents and now I found:
10 th auction. Kiev, February 2001
"Gypsy Boy"
Kolesnikov S., canvas on cardboard, oil

SergeiSK · 14.07.2009, 00:05

vyadem,
Yes, really surprise! A boy is terrible, if compared with Kharlamovs. Hardly Kolesnikov would not make a copy of Kharlamov, and even this failed.

13.07.2009, 23:59	Язык оригинала: Русский #29
vyadem Гуру Регистрация: 11.11.2008 Сообщений: 1,897 Спасибо: 2,905 Поблагодарили 2,365 раз(а) в 550 сообщениях Репутация: 4046	and as such a surprise to you? leafing through auktsionniki Antique-cents and now I found: 10 th auction. Kiev, February 2001 "Gypsy Boy" Kolesnikov S., canvas on cardboard, oil Миниатюры

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Help rate now	Михаил	Costs, valuation, attribution	2	20.02.2015 22:34
Продано: Help rate now	sergejnowo	Sell	29	16.06.2009 21:32
Help rate now	oleg15	Costs, valuation, attribution	11	09.01.2009 16:41
Help rate now	Мейкуп_Екатерина	Costs, valuation, attribution	0	18.11.2008 12:34
Help rate now	tatmianin	Costs, valuation, attribution	4	06.10.2008 15:42

21.06.2009, 10:22	Язык оригинала: Русский #21
vyadem Гуру Регистрация: 11.11.2008 Сообщений: 1,897 Спасибо: 2,905 Поблагодарили 2,365 раз(а) в 550 сообщениях Репутация: 4046	Cyril Syzransky, that's the book handy

21.06.2009, 20:37	Язык оригинала: Русский #24
Василий50 Guest Сообщений: n/a	For example, the picture is phototypes and lottery products, the question: what was the draw? this is why there is no mention anywhere else? And the size of my paintings 46,5 x 54,0 but the catalog 60,2 x 50,5

23.06.2009, 17:56	Язык оригинала: Русский #27
Василий50 Guest Сообщений: n/a	Was an expert. At otiske found the word "picture Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III" What may be its cost?

14.07.2009, 00:05	Язык оригинала: Русский #30
SergeiSK Гуру Регистрация: 10.08.2008 Адрес: Russia, $ochi Сообщений: 5,666 Спасибо: 1,397 Поблагодарили 6,209 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 1 Репутация: 9995	vyadem, Yes, really surprise! A boy is terrible, if compared with Kharlamovs. Hardly Kolesnikov would not make a copy of Kharlamov, and even this failed.