Help evaluate the picture, signing "Harlamov 1870" - Page 3 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

vyadem · 21-06-2009, 10:22

Cyril Syzransky, that's the book handy

Кирилл Сызранский · 21-06-2009, 10:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by vyadem

that's the book handy

Without books anywhere.

"Knowledge is power"!

[color="# 666686"]Added 2 hours 57 minutes[/color]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SergeiSK

The handbook Solovieva is a sample of such a signature Kharlamova from work in 1875.

Especially now, reached for Solovyov and looked.
He has given a signature 75-year, but there is the letter "a" a capital, rather than printed. And the letter "X", "L", "m"-other.
In a scientific catalog are 26 signatyur Kharlamova in color. And only one such sign 70-year and it was with this picture.
This author very little paintings after his departure to Paris in 69-m signed in Cyrillic. Usual signature-"Harlamoff" with a date or without.

олег назаров · 21-06-2009, 13:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by SergeiSK

commissioned by the Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III. Ie The Draw products

absolutely sure that the same ....

Василий50 · 21-06-2009, 20:37

For example, the picture is phototypes and lottery products, the question: what was the draw? this is why there is no mention anywhere else? And the size of my paintings 46,5 x 54,0 but the catalog 60,2 x 50,5

K-Maler · 22-06-2009, 02:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

The museum's copy in 1913, apparently. Hence, the embossed stamp of the museum.

I had an old postcard with this picture. A copy may watercolor ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 16 minutes[/color]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SergeiSK

I think that this is not a lithograph,

With an increase is not similar to lithography, which always has a resemblance to the picture, but here is visible brush spots like watercolor.

SergeiSK · 22-06-2009, 08:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-Maler

With an increase is not similar to lithography, which always has a resemblance to the picture, but here is visible brush spots like watercolor.

Agree. But the same phototype, the prototype of modern photographs, can clearly pass all shades, stains and some other nuances.
In general, you, Vasiliy50, we must show that the work of specialists "live", that they have identified equipment. For photos to distinguish from watercolor lithograph can be difficult. Well, really, after all this becomes clear value and price of your work.

Василий50 · 23-06-2009, 17:56

Was an expert. At otiske found the word "picture Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III"
What may be its cost?

SergeiSK · 23-06-2009, 20:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vasiliy50

What may be its cost?

Such things are sometimes sold on online auction hammer. Ask the price there. I think that the price in the region of $ 100-200. Here are some examples, though not entirely accurate, your picture better than them:
http://molotok.ru/item668582442_suri..._30na40sm.html
http://molotok.ru/item667197500_russ...tografiya.html
http://molotok.ru/item668583199_shal...a_filyara.html
http://molotok.ru/item668583886_russ..._30na38sm.html
http://molotok.ru/item655700311_lito..._rod_1860.html
http://molotok.ru/item667516835_nest..._35na44sm.html

vyadem · 13-07-2009, 23:59

and as such a surprise to you?
leafing through auktsionniki Antique-cents and now I found:
10 th auction. Kiev, February 2001
"Gypsy Boy"
Kolesnikov S., canvas on cardboard, oil

SergeiSK · 14-07-2009, 00:05

vyadem,
Yes, really surprise! A boy is terrible, if compared with Kharlamovs. Hardly Kolesnikov would not make a copy of Kharlamov, and even this failed.

13-07-2009, 23:59	Original language: Russian #29
vyadem Гуру Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1,897 Thanks: 2,905 Thanked 2,365 Times in 550 Posts Reputation: 4046	and as such a surprise to you? leafing through auktsionniki Antique-cents and now I found: 10 th auction. Kiev, February 2001 "Gypsy Boy" Kolesnikov S., canvas on cardboard, oil Attached Thumbnails

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Help rate now	Михаил	Costs, valuation, attribution	2	20-02-2015 22:34
Sold: Help rate now	sergejnowo	Sell	29	16-06-2009 21:32
Help rate now	oleg15	Costs, valuation, attribution	11	09-01-2009 16:41
Help rate now	Мейкуп_Екатерина	Costs, valuation, attribution	0	18-11-2008 12:34
Help rate now	tatmianin	Costs, valuation, attribution	4	06-10-2008 15:42

21-06-2009, 10:22	Original language: Russian #21
vyadem Гуру Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1,897 Thanks: 2,905 Thanked 2,365 Times in 550 Posts Reputation: 4046	Cyril Syzransky, that's the book handy

21-06-2009, 20:37	Original language: Russian #24
Василий50 Guest Posts: n/a	For example, the picture is phototypes and lottery products, the question: what was the draw? this is why there is no mention anywhere else? And the size of my paintings 46,5 x 54,0 but the catalog 60,2 x 50,5

23-06-2009, 17:56	Original language: Russian #27
Василий50 Guest Posts: n/a	Was an expert. At otiske found the word "picture Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III" What may be its cost?

14-07-2009, 00:05	Original language: Russian #30
SergeiSK Гуру Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Russia, $ochi Posts: 5,666 Thanks: 1,397 Thanked 6,209 Times in 1,926 Posts Blog Entries: 4294967279 Reputation: 9995	vyadem, Yes, really surprise! A boy is terrible, if compared with Kharlamovs. Hardly Kolesnikov would not make a copy of Kharlamov, and even this failed.