Sotheby's pre-auction exhibition in Kiev

[Yaya]

Altim, okay, I will not beat: p
feeble, you say?
Here Chichkan chmorili these monkeys. and buyers, it turned out, the monkeys something right! : D
my opinion Glushchenko roughly the same as that of the Tar Aivazovsky. just do not beat: D
but what is interesting! We Chichkan with monkeys have a chance to become the size of global importance (another question - how he had the chance to dispose), and in Hlushchenko - no: p
Ukrainian Sterling at Sotheby's - not garbage. it's just the beginning. for them just to get to the directory - is already well

[vyadem]

Yaya, Nikolai Petrovich Glushchenko nothing to prove and do not have to!
It took a great artist! Only sorry that so far we are very uncomfortable with his pre-war period. But while he was far from last place in the center of European culture, in Paris.
About Chichkan not say anything ... I do not understand this "art" ...

[Yaya]

vyadem, and what do you mean the phrase "held as an artist of genius"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

Ukrainian Sterling at Sotheby's - not garbage. it's just the beginning. for them just to get to the directory - is already well

Yes, there's no question about the amount, but about the fact of appearing on the auction Sterling Ukrainian contemporary art.

[vyadem]

Yaya, is a very philosophical question ... how many people - so many opinions. I do not mean that his work is sold with 5 zeros, or the title People's Artist of USSR (By the way, to them I am skeptical ... it is difficult, for example, provide a "People's Artist of France Monet ")... but the bright creativity and life, the environment in Kotormo he developed as an artist, his legacy (which is only now undergoing his personal exhibition at the National. a museum), his constant search for something new (cf. the same work 20-30-x 40-50's and 60's and 70's) ... and just when looking at his paintings, it is only positive feelings ... much more you can talk and argue ... but still it remains my opinion
but I want to ask more of the same MT. Chichkan ... for what he "creates" ... I think the answer will conclude in the "green notes": rolleyes: ... and it is unlikely he will say to burn some of their works, both in his time like Hlushchenko ...
Once again I do not want to offend anybody, especially Chichkan, perhaps he and artist of genius. I rather mean by "Chichkan" collected by way of many contemporary artists, the same Hearst, who quickly nashtampovat something big, flashy and expensive to sell ...

[Yaya]

you think this is a brilliant painting? : confused:

[vyadem]

I confess, watercolors I did not like ...
but oil is breathtaking ... what you submitted:
1.Parizhsky during 30-s. Since then, he started ... although even with this. Very interesting work of his 20's, when he was still in Berlin.
2. Watercolor - I've already told you ...
3. 70's ... not his best work.
Yes, and as can be judged by 3 works, with the picture?
Just wondering, you have already visited his exhibition in NHMU?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от vyadem

People's Artist of the USSR

Сообщение от vyadem

but the bright and creative life, the environment in Kotormo he developed as an artist, his legacy (which is only now undergoing his personal exhibition at the National. A museum), his constant search for something new (compare the same work 20-30's, 40-50's and 60's 70's )...

Yes, the quantity, but interesting in ivestitsionnom plan, and in the collection ...
But to call it

Сообщение от vyadem

great artist!

Not cool right? Or on bezrybe and Glushchenko Van Gogh??

[Altim]

Among the several thousand works, there is always something that looks important.
For me Hlushchenko - is now such things in the first place.
By the way, I am relatively new to "rasprobovat", before once he strained me, and I foolishly even poprodaval their initial purchase of this author. Now sorry.

[vyadem]

Cyril Syzransky,

Сообщение от vyadem

is a very philosophical question ... how many people - so many opinions.