Sotheby's pre-auction exhibition in Kiev

[Yaya]

Altim, okay, I will not beat: p
feeble, you say?
Here Chichkan chmorili these monkeys. and buyers, it turned out, the monkeys something right! : D
my opinion Glushchenko roughly the same as that of the Tar Aivazovsky. just do not beat: D
but what is interesting! We Chichkan with monkeys have a chance to become the size of global importance (another question - how he had the chance to dispose), and in Hlushchenko - no: p
Ukrainian Sterling at Sotheby's - not garbage. it's just the beginning. for them just to get to the directory - is already well

[vyadem]

Yaya, Nikolai Petrovich Glushchenko nothing to prove and do not have to!
It took a great artist! Only sorry that so far we are very uncomfortable with his pre-war period. But while he was far from last place in the center of European culture, in Paris.
About Chichkan not say anything ... I do not understand this "art" ...

[Yaya]

vyadem, and what do you mean the phrase "held as an artist of genius"?

[vyadem]

Yaya, is a very philosophical question ... how many people - so many opinions. I do not mean that his work is sold with 5 zeros, or the title People's Artist of USSR (By the way, to them I am skeptical ... it is difficult, for example, provide a "People's Artist of France Monet ")... but the bright creativity and life, the environment in Kotormo he developed as an artist, his legacy (which is only now undergoing his personal exhibition at the National. a museum), his constant search for something new (cf. the same work 20-30-x 40-50's and 60's and 70's) ... and just when looking at his paintings, it is only positive feelings ... much more you can talk and argue ... but still it remains my opinion
but I want to ask more of the same MT. Chichkan ... for what he "creates" ... I think the answer will conclude in the "green notes": rolleyes: ... and it is unlikely he will say to burn some of their works, both in his time like Hlushchenko ...
Once again I do not want to offend anybody, especially Chichkan, perhaps he and artist of genius. I rather mean by "Chichkan" collected by way of many contemporary artists, the same Hearst, who quickly nashtampovat something big, flashy and expensive to sell ...

[Yaya]

you think this is a brilliant painting? : confused:

[vyadem]

I confess, watercolors I did not like ...
but oil is breathtaking ... what you submitted:
1.Parizhsky during 30-s. Since then, he started ... although even with this. Very interesting work of his 20's, when he was still in Berlin.
2. Watercolor - I've already told you ...
3. 70's ... not his best work.
Yes, and as can be judged by 3 works, with the picture?
Just wondering, you have already visited his exhibition in NHMU?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

vyadem, I remember this moment because of reports from London.

Сообщение от qwerty

I was impressed with the struggle of Ukrainians for a portrait of an unknown to me Cossack Zakharchenko work as an unknown to me the artist Vassilkovsky

But by reports in the painting and even in the history of art is not a "dog" ate.
Also because you have there is almost a genius? So?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 49 seconds[/color]
vyadem, but the genius of an artist is not "opinion"?

[Altim]

Cyril Syzransky, an artist of genius may well be local in terms of sales, fame, etc., that if we talk about the specifics of the domestic art market (CIS, I mean). True, I usually use the word "talented", "outstanding" or something like that, do not say "brilliant" because it is hard to argue.

[Yaya]

Altim, there are no local genius !!!!!!!!! Local genius - an oxymoron!

[Veronic]

Yaya,
This is certainly good that the Ukrainian artists were at Sotheby's, one can say a breakthrough. But all the same too early to draw such far-reaching conclusions. I think that the whole life ahead of them, and will have a lot of work. Complacent it is too early.