Ask the experts to Express an opinion

[artcol]

[QUOTE=Jane Doe;3327071]
One of the sources of the data acquisition Age of drawings was Leningrad late 80 X. There was a very old man, previously head of one of the publishers of Leningrad. He periodically gave the whole series paper drawings and usuary (stencils) Lebedev in local second-hand MAGAZIN@
Question: where he took them in such numbers?

Добавлено через 2 минуты
zdhgdg sdth sd

[artcol]

[QUOTE=Тати;3326671]All possible. But the work was acquired together with the drawings Lebedev and Tatlin 20-30x, that indirectly suggests that it's our artist. In the directory Suprematists I, unfortunately, did not see clearly of similar works. Although, of course, I'm not all prosmotrela@
It is rather cubism. Lebedev was cubist period.

[artcol]

[QUOTE=redbor;3327821]Jane Doe, thanks for the pictures.
I'm sorry, but that's exactly what the author Vladev@
It is unlikely.

[artcol]

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3327521]
Though, no, there's nothing fantastic? "Lebedevich" and now delayt@
On old paper....

[Homoludens]

Сообщение от Кирилл Сызранский

Century Lebedev worked in the 20's as a book designer, and in 1924, he was head of the art edition of the children's Department of the state publishing house. I'll have his paper was not? Why did he have to use "old leaves with topographical Atlas of the world, 1909, old prints and different designs, torn from old books on art and architectural and engineering drawings in German with Russian buildings, various technical units"?

But, as we know, the "old reproductions of paintings and different patterns, torn from old books on art, and generally any pages from old books, sealed on one side only or unsealed at all (the bookends), readily used and is used by forgers graphics, because this is the easiest way to get genuine paper era.

[redbor]

[QUOTE="Homoludens;3327971"]any pages from old books, sealed on one side only ...use the forgers graphics, because this is the easiest way to get genuine paper Epogen so! ...I like things immediately aroused the distrust and often confirmed.

[QUOTE="artcol;3327901"]Lebedev was cubist periodby but not this In 2010 in the state Tretyakov gallery was an exhibition Century Lebedev, a lot of work from the store, but similar to that shown in the subject - not seen

[artcol]

Сообщение от redbor

was, but not like this In 2010 in the state Tretyakov gallery was an exhibition Century Lebedev, a lot of work from the store, but similar to that shown in the subject is not seen

Not surprising...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от redbor

was, but not this

I wonder what cubism was Lebedev.
It was a period of experimentation in 1917-22 years, but it is not cubism in the accepted concept, and not the Russian kubofuturizma.
Still lifes of this period were primarily formal, even in a certain sense program-formal. But cubism... don't know.

[artcol]

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3328111]Wonder what cubism was Lebedev?
It was a period of experimentation in 1917-22 years, but it is not cubism in the accepted concept, and not the Russian kubofuturizma.
Yes, still lifes of this period were primarily formal, even in a certain sense program-formal.
But cubism... not snay@
Saw his cubist portraits.
Look at your leisure.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="artcol;3328281"]Saw his cubist portrety@
In his sleep, apparently?