Kandinsky Prize 2011

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от uriart; 1792473"

Well, once people go look at this nonsense, and yet a second time there and they will drive a stick is not .

If you read my comments in the photo , you probably noticed that I was not thrilled. But to say that the " Kandinsky Prize " commercially successful event (at the expense of what?) That the participants - rowing money with a shovel because that participate in it - why? Search for some saboteurs to the money corrupting and being duped by people - kindergarten some . The population of our children or what?

Сообщение от K-Maler; 1792363"

a lot of money invested in the exhibition industry rather narrow group of artists and Contemporary -direction , no longer possible to see etogot ..

What are the names " group of artists " and let's talk in detail.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart; 1792473"

if you look at this "creativity" in another , say from the perspective of both an opera singer .
Who once heard a singer with a weak or a bad voice , the second time will not listen to him.

It's not a singer , and it is not in the power of his voice , and composer and director of the opera itself .
People , education for " La Traviata " and " The Barber of Seville " is hard to perceive even the " Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk " ( see red. Art. " Muddle Instead of Music " in the newspaper "Pravda" of 28 . 01. 1936 ), not to mention some " Turn of the Screw ," Britten's or , for example, mono-opera "The Diary of Anne Frank " by Gregory Fried and Samuilovich " Dead Man Walking " J. Heggie ( called the works of living composers ).
Language of modern authors - whether artist or composer - is difficult to understand, sogdasen .
But, using your music as an analogy , is easy to listen to folk songs after symphonic music will ?
 >

[uriart]

Cyril Syzran, I will say this :
" Everything has its time and place!"
Limericks are good in one situation , and symphonic music , this is another case.
And except for " Lady Macbeth ". I have not heard . I'm afraid that I will not listen .
Simply by no means part of me .
I listened to a sonata by Hindemith when - did not take and do not remember , but the name of the composer.

Unfortunately I do not understand and did not hear the music of such composers as Alfred Schnittke, Sofia Gubaidulina , Hindemith and others like them . Solid sound effects and more .
Shchedrin is understandable.
Among contemporary composers, great music in Sviridov 's a miracle .
But many still can be called contemporary .
But with this dodekafaniey ( and turns on the language of cacophony !) - A full paragraph ! I do not know where there is music .
Sought and found , unfortunately.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от uriart; 1792533"

I'm afraid that I will not listen .

Well, never mind , listen to others and even like - I call the modern operas , which are now very high popularity ratings - they are among the 200 most popular , they put in the best opera houses .

Our absence there with you , I fear, will not affect the recognition or non recognition of Hindemith and Schnittke with Gubaidulina world music community.
 >

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от uriart

Of contemporary composers, great music at Sviridov

And Pahmutova!
Pakhmutova forget!

Сообщение от uriart

is a miracle.

What are its melodies of songs!
I agree that a miracle!

[Самвел]

Сообщение от uriart

Unfortunately I do not understand and did not hear the music of such composers as Alfred Schnittke

[artcol]

Сообщение от uriart

Limericks are good in one situation

Do not tell me.
We show here brought MOSH - frankly, it's better Gelman exhibition, than it is.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

Do not tell me.
We show here brought MOSH - frankly, it's better Gelman exhibition, than it is.

But it was not necessary to look at all galmanovskoe, now would be to cheer and moshovskoe passed.
 
>

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

But it was not necessary to look at all gelmanovskoe now and moshovskoe to cheer would go.
 
>

News - just relevant, but tomorrow it will no longer be relevant - and what remains of it?
And it's not true it is.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol; 1792803"

News - just relevant, but tomorrow it will no longer be relevant - and what remains of it ?

Now magazine "Bill" and asked 57 artists, curators, gallery owners , collectors and critics to choose the principal, in their opinion, people in contemporary art. a list TOP 50 people in the contemporary art .
Look , polyubopytstvuyte , there has long been pressing still somehow aktulny . >
The list is interesting as a time in the context of this conversation.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Now magazine "Bill" , interviewing 57 artists, curators , gallery owners, collectors and critics, made ​​the list 50 top people in the contemporary art .
Look , polyubopytstvuyte , there has long been pressing still somehow aktulny . >
The list is interesting as a time in the context of this conversation.
There's four in the top ten artist narostayuschey : Andrew Monastery , Ai wave, Marina Abramovic and Ilya Kabakov .

In addition to the second ( about him do not know ) - they are all pioneers . Is about them talking about? This lump can not be ignored, they developed a whole field of practices , languages, symbols, etc. which is now crawling with those who are on public relations awards such as Kandinsky > And this is already a business process , the art of having no more relation than the activity of these same members of the Moscow Union of Artists .