Help evaluate the picture

[Katerina-m]

Good all day!
Thank you all: learned a lot of interesting things.

Dear Eugene!
Unfortunately, I can not evaluate your picture - I'm not an expert and very far from pricing issues in painting.
That's why I requested to evaluate the above work to this site.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Sergei burly; 1544611"

to maintain a pleasant conversation.

Agreed.

Сообщение от Sergei burly; 1544611"

So why do not attributed to its author, who is unlikely to be less well known than Vyalov

Because the seller - a relative Vyalov.

Сообщение от Sergei burly, 1544611

explains who the Vyalov Russian man - long and hard.

If a Russian wants to buy the painting with the signature of the author, he has to buy know who the author.

Сообщение от Sergei burly; 1544611"

titanic work, find an artist who worked
      in Semeize, and an appropriate style. Then he found his niece and how it
      to persuade her to work together - like here's the work of his uncle, was found by chance, sell.
     Yes, and criminal act (forgery of the signature

Well, this is a detective, Agatha Christie.
See more simply: a relative. among others, have a picture without a signature, may be K. Vyalov, maybe not.
Must sell. Signed sale easier, and adds cost. unsigned sell - harder, the buyer must explain something. Easier - sign ... (This is assuming that the seller actually a relative of the author, although the stock number is not home, a sort of)
Perhaps the author of the 1 st leaf, really, K. Vyalov. Second - almost exactly.
I would not get into this subject, if at the time had not seen in many works of his friend K. Vyalov
And, somehow seriously doubt that there is a certificate of examination THG for the job. Although, Katerina-m, obviously telling the truth, but could not forget a prescription ..

[Игорь Гурьев]

Pictures, of course, not a masterpiece, but then the Vyalov while not shine, honestly.

I personally do not see any contraindications about authorship Vyalov.


There are also fake signatures on these paintings, he saw.

[Katerina-m]

Dear redbor! Thank you for keeping my thread on this "knife edge"! But let me ask you a question: from 8 offered to me then paintings were signed in March, two of which, after examination and I bought it, the third signed by the work I just did not like, 5 papers were not signed, one of which I liked very much (despite for expert advice, I bought it, too, which is not sorry) - these 5 papers did not have time to sign before I arrived? did not have enough ink? tired? decided that the presence of 3 signed papers will buy the entire collection? etc. ...
In terms of my "forgetfulness" I hasten to assure you that skreroz I have not yet visited: I personally drove the picture for review, pay, taking, acts, pictures were taken back.
Maybe the experts were wrong as soon as 8 work?

[redbor]

I just said his opinion on the picture ..

Сообщение от Katerina-m

Or maybe the experts were wrong ...?

This is the question of the examination, it is difficult to answer, yet the most expertise.

You have to read the expert's opinion on this picture ...

[Katerina-m]

Added after 29 minutes

http://sovcom.ru/index.php?category=...er&painter=405


Found just such a page - is it possible for her to navigate?

[redbor]

Of course you can.
This is not the price.
 
But Sovkom evaluates Bole-mene really.

[Allena]

Katerina-m, Please specify the size of your pictures - this price is also dependent.

[Katerina-m]

1.
40 x 80

2.
70 x 100