Help evaluate the picture
 

K. Vyalov, 20's, bought her niece of the artist in the early 90's.
Blagodrna advance.

I understand that work is just "priceless" :) ...
Perhaps, then tell me where you can make an estimate?

To revitalize the debate give the link: http://www.maslovka.org/modules.php?...owpage&pid=237

I do not know how my niece, but the authorship K. Vyalov somnitelno.Sravnite themselves

And polpis delivered after writing the picture itself and it is evident that after quite a while.

Thank you for participating in the discussion!

Authorship confirmed - before buying made expertise in the Tretyakov Gallery.

I think it's 50-ies.
And how did you realize that the signature set later?

By the way, what the big deal?
For example, I often sign my pictures later.

How much later? On 10-20-40 years?
 Presented at the picturesque canvas layer already, as they say, "zadubel" paint lost brightness and prominent location have attrition through which reviewed belila.V same time signature has a fresh paint shine and not the slightest penetration of the main scenic sloy.Esli speak about the mechanics of the application signature , we see that the letters were discharged based on topography paintings rather than a stroke .. And the capital letters in the first attempt failed, has been erased, but the paint is left barely noticeable reddish background.
 I am confident that with careful watching "live" all vyplyvet out.
Pro Painting default.

You could not show the photos of expertise or at least call the name of the expert.

examination, is unlikely to be.
Can be verbal assurances?

But, I also doubt that this work Vyalov.

My friend was fond of Easel, he had seen enough and K. Vyalov.

This work, like something far away.

Good evening, dear guru and old residents of the site! Thank you for your active participation in my theme. To clarify some of the "controversial" points clarified:
1. Pictures bought 20 years ago, I was offered eight works, many of which I liked (I do not claim to be pro or special - just a fan), but nevertheless, I asked the experts - THG - for attribution - so that the examination was - without the "unlikely" - did not see any reason to dissemble.
2. Of all the proposed works was signed by two. In THG confirmed the authorship of all 8 papers, but, nevertheless, to recommend buying the signed stuff. According to me, I took the advice.
3. Time of writing, I also outlined in the Tretyakov Gallery.
4. 've Been searching for the original red background of the "erased" in the letter - even under a magnifying glass is not found?? - May be misled amateur photo quality? - Or I force svoevo incompetence do not see these nuances?
5. Not collected and tried over the years to sell the painting, so the expert paper folder of documents essential not hold and, of course, the names of the expert can not remember. But sure got into the old documents and I will seek the expertise, the more that I still have documents in all 8 works.

Добавлено через 1 час 21 минуту
By the way, here's the second picture, I dated her 50-ies.