Royal wedding

[artcol]

Сообщение от Tana

artcol Yes I live here among all this >

This is certainly a serious argument.

Added after 19 minutes

Сообщение от iside

Most killing me on the forum , when , as if you're on the interrogation of his uncle who has a " life experience and common sense " and based on the existence of this "common sense " as you would blame the lack of thereof , zadalbyvaya required to argue their every word , uh , is not only I have this problem . >

iside, you all right ? Some weird messages from you come to the forum >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "artcol

This is certainly a serious argument.

Yeah more serious census ZhZhshnogo "guru" of Uryupinsk.
>

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

This is not a newspaper, and Learn Some activists, whose main goal - to keep the amount of reading them at some level. There, in these LJ, "grazing" the same audience ... >

Cyril, all you know - some who aim > Wikipedia says the same thing - in which there who have the goal?

The powers of the monarch, known as the royal prerogative, is still extensive. In particular, only the monarch has the right to declare war and make peace. And not only on behalf of the UK, but also on behalf of other countries that recognize over a British crown - are, for example, Canada and Australia. Also widespread misconception that the head of the cabinet is selected by universal suffrage. In fact, the prime minister appoints the monarch. By tradition, the post is approved head the winning party, but not otherwise legally prohibited, in principle, the monarch may be headed the government of any other person.

From here

Posted 3 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yeah more serious census ZhZhshnogo "guru" of Uryupinsk. >

Serious, Cyril, seriously. How can we challenge the - here the facts, a man walks the royal palace, the site of the parliament comes, and then someone to write to attract and entertain the audience >

All this is reminiscent of the parable of the 3 blind and the elephant.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

Cyril , all you know - some of whom aim >

And here and not go to grandma , clearly all clear . >

Сообщение от artcol; 1627741 "

the site of the parliament comes and there is someone to write to attract and entertain the audience >

" The audience is to attract and entertain " - is precisely Learn bloggers , never even an all-time in England .
_________
And the second .
I'm very pretty, that the British royal house , there are real opportunities to influence policy .

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"The audience is to attract and entertain" - is precisely Learn bloggers,

And blogoverov.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

_________
And the second .
I'm very pretty, that the British royal house , there are real opportunities to influence world politics .

So what sport is ? There are opportunities and people invest in them , invested in an event of this type of wedding . And not just - that the audience entertained .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

There is a possibility , and people invest in them , invested in an event of this type of wedding .

Speaking of investments:
Russian businessmen , Roman Abramovich and Alisher Usmanov, were the top three richest people in the UK according to ratings compiled by journalists of the newspaper Sunday Times.
  >

[Tana]

artcol I was not only the site of the Parliament I go, I was in Parliament (and time), but there are many interesting things to learn, come to the UK, visit themselves.


What about weddings and we have that weddings do to entertain the audience, or invest, if the wedding, "lush"? so simply made.

artcol you once saw as the Queen delivers a speech in Parliament (even written for her by others), it goes to Parliament, the opening of Parliament, all of this ancient tradition and a very beautiful, repeated every year for ages! and a wedding in the same way, everything is made so simple to be so evolved over the centuries.

artcol I even thought this does not come to read about the Volga in Wikipedia (where you live judging by your profile) and tell you afterwards how people live in the Volga region and argue with you on this issue citing Article from the Internet, you have an amazing ability (again):
 like M. Zhvanetsky:
"Let's talk about the collapse and the rise of Hollywood without seeing a single film. Let's push the philosophers, not by reading their works. Let's argue about the taste of oysters and coconuts with those who ate them, until they were hoarse, to blows, perceiving the taste food on the ear, the color of the tooth, the stench in the eyes, imagining the film by name, oil painting by name, country of 'Club kinoputeshestvy' views on the severity of anthologies. "

PS In Wikipedia, anyone can go and correct the information or write anything, because he thinks I do not think this is the source of 100%correct, no longer even appears on your link, please see the official British sites, primary sources, everything written.

PS I corrected the article in Wikipedia, you can see:
(And thus the sources you trust?) >
http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...BD%D1%81%D0%BA %D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85% D0%B8%D1%8F & stable = 0

[artcol]

Сообщение от Tana

artcol I was not only the site of the Parliament I go, I was in Parliament (and time), but there are many interesting things to learn, come to the UK, visit themselves.


What about weddings and we have that weddings do to entertain the audience, or invest, if the wedding, "lush"? so simply made.

artcol you once saw as the Queen delivers a speech in Parliament (even written for her by others), it goes to Parliament, the opening of Parliament, all of this ancient tradition and a very beautiful, repeated every year for ages! and a wedding in the same way, everything is made so simple to be so evolved over the centuries.

artcol I even thought this does not come to read about the Volga in Wikipedia (where you live judging by your profile) and tell you afterwards how people live in the Volga region and argue with you on this issue citing Article from the Internet, you have an amazing ability (again):
 like M. Zhvanetsky:
"Let's talk about the collapse and the rise of Hollywood without seeing a single film. Let's push the philosophers, not by reading their works. Let's argue about the taste of oysters and coconuts with those who ate them, until they were hoarse, to blows, perceiving the taste food on the ear, the color of the tooth, the stench in the eyes, imagining the film by name, oil painting by name, country of 'Club kinoputeshestvy' views on the severity of anthologies. "

PS In Wikipedia, anyone can go and correct the information or write anything, because he thinks I do not think this is the source of 100%correct, no longer even appears on your link, please see the official British sites, primary sources, everything written.

PS I corrected the article in Wikipedia, you can see:
(And thus the sources you trust?) >
http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...F & stable = 0

Tana, what you could fix the Wikipedia article - certainly makes you honor "But the Internet a great and everything is not correct >

And I would like to note: I never told how people live in the UK, so do not <!--~ 10 "-" I refute the assertion of Seagulls, that a British monarch has no political or economic power. With facts in hand, and you, as I understood, argued to the contrary. Attribute to me something other than this - I think incorrect way to debate.
 
Okay, let's no longer play up this theme - and stay in their, still no special benefit to us that knowledge does not bring >

[Самвел]

Another couple decided to make fun of the rest of the world . In evronovostyah reported that viditeli vegetables on the table to get the guests right from the patch, after hours as they are cut off . Both are serious for several days give itervyu evronovostyam , and very experienced , that will miss some detail in organizing the event .