Reflections

[gans]

Dear Authority, I think it's time to decide (or at least think) that, for anyone at all sites and forums ARTinvestment.RU.
Just want to say that this text is purely analytical, and I ask him not to be offended.

Perhaps you feel it is a trifle, but I think this apparent trend. The forum is extremely reduced the level of discussion. The climax was yesterday's theme http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=38735, and many others are not far away. I understand perfectly, you can rejoice, have fun, argue, write in the gazebo, etc, but I think that all this should not detract from the level of the forum.
You have created an interesting site that claims to specific positions on domestic and global art market, and on the main page you hanging "All matters of interest to NATA NOVA "..?? This at least not seriously.

It may be summer, no season, but almost no decent communication. Some interesting interlocutors, such as Art-lover, but ceased to write. Many began to write very little: Eugene, dedulya37, etc. Someone is trying to do something, but usually these attempts to fundamentally break down the shaft ridiculous, and often zhlobskih messages.

I understand that people today "without brakes" and overwhelm forum stuff very quickly, and with great enthusiasm.

Sam plan to different virtual projects, and I think that today people are looking for quality. In this, I advise a minimum, change at "hot topics of the Forum" to say "the best themes of the Forum, and look at the same time, but should there be ARTinvestment.RU Forum so much" popular ".

[Евгений]

Сообщение от gans

and on the main page you hanging "All matters of interest to NATA NOVA "..?? This at least not seriously.

Fully agree with you .. and not only on this particular topic.

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от gans

The climax was yesterday's theme http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=38735, and many others are not far away.

It was my fault.

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Vivien

It's my fault.

but I do not think, because the issue is still turned to art. Look at the end of the exhibition in London was discussed with the advertising campaign.

gans, Nata modern artist, and her concern to many questions, she can sometimes naively asks, so what? And if we imagine for a moment, Van Gogh, because he is a constantly went by absinthe, you imagine what he wrote on the forum here? You would have it, too, was asked to leave and not speak? If we talk about art, then we must take into account many factors ,....

As for politics, I agree, the forum should not delve into it

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Veronic

And if we imagine for a moment, Van Gogh, because he is a constantly went by absinthe, you imagine what he wrote on the forum here?

Van Gogh did not go all the time "under the absinthe, his real biography is, finally, better known ... And as he wrote and that he could write on the forum could well imagine, because his correspondence was published long ago. On art, he wrote amazing ...

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Van Gogh did not go all the time "under the absinthe, his real biography is, finally, better known ... And as he wrote and that he could write on the forum could well imagine, because his correspondence was published long ago. On art, he wrote amazing ...

Of course, in that context, it was a metaphor .... (substitute the name of Van Gogh in the name of someone who was much more dependent and substance of your post to disappear) Overall Konteksa theme it is just about îôôòîï, faultfinding and tolerance. ( "style" and "level" discussions on the site)
Organize a new topic, so as not to cause a new round of amendments, reproaches, and other attempts at domination "meryanya thoughts and erudition ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Van Gogh did not go all the time "under the absinthe, his real biography is, finally, better known ... And as he wrote and that he could write on the forum could well imagine, because his correspondence was published long ago. On art, he wrote amazing ...

Interestingly, while those who cut off his ear? Or ear had been in place forever?

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Veronic

nteresno, and who cut off his ear? Or ear was always on the spot?

The ear was in place before (as we now know) a quarrel with Gauguin over a woman, when Gauguin, waving something of a sword, wounded Van Gogh cut off the tip of his ear. As the doctor had to know what happened (it could result in the involvement of police), the Van Gogh has put forward its version of ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Organize a new topic, so as not to cause a new round of amendments, reproaches, and other attempts at domination "meryanya thoughts and erudition ...

I never dreamed of - do not speak slang ...

[Veronic]

Сообщение от K-Maler

ear was in place before (as we now know) a quarrel with Gauguin over a woman, when Gauguin, waving something of a sword, wounded Van Gogh cut off the tip of his ear. As the doctor had to know what happened (it could result in the involvement of police), the Van Gogh has put forward its version of ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

I never dreamed of - do not speak slang ...

It turns out that contrary to the well-known version of the brilliant Dutch painter Vincent Van Gogh did not cut off his ear with a razor in a fit of madness
Zahar Radova - 05.05.2009
His quarrel with each compartment Vincent - the great French impressionist Paul Gauguin.

This conclusion, following decades in the archives, historians, art historians came from Hamburg, Hans Kaufmann and Rita Vildegans. In the newly released book, they argue that in December 1888, Paul Gauguin was staying at the Van Gogh in Arles in France. Before Christmas the Dutch worsened metabolic disease that has made him more aggressive.

Friends quarrel in a brothel because of a prostitute named Rachel, the attention which they both sought. Heavily drunk Van Gogh attacked Gauguin. The Frenchman (who was an excellent swordsman) snatched rapier, waved it and, most likely inadvertently cut off another left ear. He fled in terror and threw the weapon into the river, and Van Gogh returned to Rachel, gave her his bloodied ear and fell asleep.
The next day, both testified in the police. Van Gogh mumbled something unintelligible, and told her about the version of Gauguin with a razor blade.

While the Dutch artist and was silent about this story, in a letter to his brother Theo he wrote: "... Fortunately, Paul is not armed with a revolver or a rifle."

After this incident, Paul Gauguin, hurriedly left for Tahiti, and Vincent Van Gogh, upset his departure, he shot himself.


In principle, this makes no difference if people are willing to kill each other in real life, what we want to achieve adequacy in the forum? That was my message.
Of course, we should try to behave in the bounds of decency, but it is not always possible, if emotions are going wild.

[gans]

Vladimir, another small question. It seems a strange situation with the "weights" for the assessment reports. There are the usual gratitude can make a "unary minus"? And then at the request of one person, another may look very "ugly".

I propose to recover the lost or inflated reputation, depending on the number of "ordinary" thanks, and in general to abolish the "scales".