Reflections

[Vladimir]

gans, I do not know this cuisine, do not know exactly how and on what criteria are ratings. But I suspect that the technology standard and perfected over the years. I better understood the ratio of thanks to the number of publications. Also not terribly objective, but at least something.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

I agree. Libra cruel instrument.

the extremes are possible, but usually does not happen (sorry no-fault). To the owner of the high reputation not too lazy to make something "administrative", looking for a "trigger" (a blatant lack of tact, frankly personal attack or something like that). In short, the risk is, you're right, but in practice in the red zone very few people are sent.

[Posav]

Сообщение от Vladimir

gans, I do not know this cuisine, do not know exactly how and on what criteria are ratings. But I suspect that the technology standard and perfected over the years. I better understood the ratio of thanks to the number of publications. Also not terribly objective, but at least something.

There is the internet is full of forums with the same kernel, graphics like this, but there are no options in a particular order or who have all their rating could zhahnut minus but still anonymous. What can the owner of a large rating or moderator to send a couple dozen with a minus, but not thousands, of same. Perhaps here would have to change the settings to eliminate this ugly phenomenon.
I prefer the system: one thank you - one point. I can see who gave thanks that there was no sham nakrutok.

[Тютчев]

And whether the person giving such power? (The man is always man. Do not tempt him!) Huge amount of gratitude can not be a result of prudence and usefulness of the user, but only its long-term presence on the forum. Write a short message, be pleasant to other active members, but, most importantly, write as much as possible, without worrying about informativeness.
      And if you just come to the forum and do not always agree, or, God forbid, you Nakhamu, as you said, and now you have already in the red! There are also function to remove your "thank you" and immediately clear who do not agree with, ie understand the position of man. And then it turns out, zaimel someone on your tooth and surreptitiously dropped you a reputation (how!), But you did not know who and what did it. As some rude ones! God forbid mom and dad taught! Forum - a place of pure polemic, but not opaque intrigue and villainy! It is necessary to defend their point of view with the help of intelligence, not the fifth point, provocation and Petty tricks! Forum - a place for intellectuals, not the mischief!

[NATA NOVA]

I have a technical question: whether it is possible (technically) one click to remove all commenting on a particular user?

[observer]

Сообщение от Vladimir

If on the way to the forum to look at the primary site artinvestment.ru (such as articles "Investing in art or in the guide forum), then you will find there are many unbanal information: tips beginners to collectors, information on the exposed forgeries, advice on specific examples of work. All this is available absolutely bezvozmezdo visitors. Almost a year has been free and statistics. I'm sorry if you did not find these times.
In addition there is an important point: access to the database and ratings - is a service that has a fixed price and quality standard. That is, people have any idea what they pay. If it is to standardize and formalize as a paid service unbanal information received by professionals in the course of their activities, the result would be an interesting Pay service. I am sure that subscribers would have found him immediately. In the west is such a thing works quite well (Forbes Collector Newsletter and many others). Why do not you offer the market a paid mailing list? I would have tried it and signed it.

You must not be angry, sir, but the logical thread of your argument desperately torn.
The first part of your promise, in response to the reiteration of homespun truth "if you want, so you and I share, state and itself, the conclusion follows: we shared over the years, but then decided it was better for the money. But at a fixed price and standard quality. (As if the other way.) Keep silent so far about the standard.
Do not save, and links to free information for beginners. After your appeal is to the professionals, but for them these materials is commonplace, the novelty does not shine, simply uninteresting. And how would you not engage samozaklinaniyami - halva, halva! - Sweeter from this mouth will not.
The second part of your message, in fact, disavows your call to share. You acknowledge that all information you have to pay a pro. Good that you understood this.
Now about the standard. Of course, you realize that it is a noun without an adjective absolutely nothing. Standards are low and high, government and industry, European and World, etc. What is your quality standard?
Unfortunately, I can not compare the quality of selling your information with similar products from other vendors. Probably, the criteria for your standard somewhere buried in the depths of your portal. It seems possible once again to share them with readers.

[Vladimir]

observer, whether the right to spend time on the gap analysis of logical threads of others? If you devote this time to the study forum (start with a guide) and the main site, we can find, in particular, Terms trial access to the database http://artinvestment.ru/subscription/# 02 This will help you evaluate quality.

Knowledge of professional, of course, may cost money. And no one forces you to share them for free. I sincerely urge you to formalize this knowledge into a commercial information product and offer it on the market. However, I am very grateful to those professionals who teach at the forum, as newcomers to protect themselves from errors. Imagine, there are people who talk about fakes and without charge "teach suckers, instead of chuckling, while standing on the sidelines.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от observer

You must not be angry, sir, but the logical thread of your argument desperately torn.

Not quite. Credits have the idea and implement it. Then it turned out, as I understand it, that maintaining a site on the agreed level takes time, even the purely practical, not to mention the time costs of obtaining the information. This is not quite the same thing to share the experience already accumulated in other times and on other occasions. The forum is in the process of communication, too, there is some "communication media", but not limited to the specific (for someone) plan, but in general: we are informed about what is happening "in general" in the sense of art ... This is valuable in extreme engagement of magazines and the press. General impression is made up of pieces "unbanal" comments, photos, etc.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от K-Maler

... not to mention the time costs of obtaining the information itself ...

    And money. While considerable, as far as I know.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Veronic

After this incident, Paul Gauguin hastily went to Tahiti, and Vincent Van Gogh, upset his departure, he shot himself.


In principle, this makes no difference if people are willing to kill each other in real life, what we want to achieve adequacy of the forum?

Well, all the same, on this forum until recently the situation has not looked like a bordello ... Yes, and Gauguin to Van Gogh had not been so ready to kill each other ... I think that now, after more than 12 pages of discussion, you should thank Gansa for correct question - it is impossible to debate and discussion, stumbling on the lexicon of style Ellochka Liu ....... Gans, thank you very much!