The Second Russian Avant-Garde "

[fabosch]

Сообщение от I-V

How do you think there should be some common features in Garnisova with Kras ? Something they like , in my opinion , both in life and in art .

Frankly, I think they probably are much more than what divides them than unites. Most importantly, Krasnopevtsev was " Monogamous " that is , it is very early and very consistently moved in the arts. And, as I do not think it was a deliberate "strategy of career development ," but rather just organic growth.
Garnisov same - a man many faces , I still can not define it for themselves "artistic face ."

[I-V]

Сообщение от IV; 1801693"

there should be some common features in Garnisova with Kras ?

In those things Garnisova that I saw on the forum, there is some serious depth, as they carved out of stone ancient utensils . Maybe that's why I got the feeling , so to speak , " arheologichnosti " when you look at them.

And then in the text referred to his " retreat " ... Everything is superimposed on each other , and with his vpomnilsya Krasnopevtsev sobenno early stuff , in which the sharp light and shadow design palpably conveys solidity and strength impresses them artifacts ...

Сообщение от fabosch; 1802013"

Garnisov same - a man many faces , I still can not define it for themselves "artistic physiognomy ".

To me his "artistic physiognomy ," the more uncertain, because I learned about it only works here and alive has ever seen. Now gradually going to fill this gap. Thanks again ! ( And alexvadim have , of course, too))

[Vladimir]

5-minute piece, there are a couple of interesting details.
http://nkbokov.livejournal.com/684090.html