Collectors

[Деко]

Сообщение от Romario

Of course, they parted with two or three less powerful things for the sake of a stronger, but this collection was created from the ground bit by bit without funding _IZ VNE_. The fact that they were selling something for the sake of buying the more powerful things with time, I certainly do not argue, but is not being bought on the shoulders sable fur coats, cars and people in gorazhi they were rich only in his collection. But, my dear uriart, I hope, there is clearly visible difference between this collection and collections of Abramovich, Vekselberg and the owner of a network of pharmacies. Therefore, it is in the Russian Museum.

Added after 3 minutes


Sovereshenno true, but not only during the war. After the war, a very long time people had, excuse me, nothing to eat for very long. Just before the 70th period.

The question is debating whether they were rich or poor. Rockefeller also was not being consumed in fur coats and cars. In general, he went on foot, because the petrol expensive. From the memoirs of his daughter - she remembered that everyone was talking about their bessmetnyh riches, and she never saw any cash or checks, or expensive clothes or jewelry - nothing. Asceticism was terrible. Slept on kkih some iron beds.
I think it would be correct to say that they are all rich, only one preferred to prosper in his - that the Rockefeller Foundation plant, then for the collector - a picture. And the same passion, and the same forward movement.
On the same basis we can and Rockefeller to name the poor - the benefits of civilization, he did not enjoy, he lived accumulation kapitalla.

[Romario]

Сообщение от SAH

Romario, Oh You can guess that at that time the deficit was unlikely to sell leather embossed

At the time, like the oligarchs did not exist, people jailed for speculation and all the major cash flows were under the state.

Then have the party, cinematographers, entertainer type Furtseva, Rostropovich, etc. and it is a nobody planted. Everything flows, everything changes. Then they, and now other.

A Rzhevskij they both then and now, and generally out of time!

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Decaux

A question on a discussion, they were rich or poor. Rockefeller also was not being consumed in fur coats and cars. In general, he went on foot, because the petrol expensive. From the memoirs of his daughter - she remembered that everyone was talking about their bessmetnyh riches, and she never saw any cash or checks, or expensive clothes or jewelry - nothing. Asceticism was terrible. Slept on kkih some iron beds.
I think it would be correct to say that they are all rich, only one preferred to prosper in his - that the Rockefeller Foundation plant, then for the collector - a picture. And the same passion, and the same forward movement.
On the same basis we can and Rockefeller to name the poor - the benefits of civilization, he did not enjoy, he lived accumulation kapitalla.

I totally agree.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Romario

Then the party was, cinematographers, entertainer type Furtseva, Rostropovich, etc.

"Then" is when?
Rostropovich Vishnevskaya with since 1974 had lived in the West, in 1978 they were deprived of his Soviet citizenship, which they were returned only in 1990.
And Furtseva died in the 74-m ...

[Romario]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"Then" is when?
Rostropovich Vishnevskaya with since 1974 had lived in the West, in 1978 they were deprived of his Soviet citizenship, which they were returned only in 1990.
And Furtseva died in the 74-m ...

I'm talking about the 60-70th golden time for those who have had the opportunity to collect. in the 80th there was nothing of the serious things - raked. biographies Furtseva Rostropovich and I know

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от dedulya37

I agree. Values of art non E hodyaschi.
Collections pr and hodyaschi. And in many ways.

Do you work in front of an antique TASS-eh?

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Romario

Do you work in front of an antique-Tass as?

I do not understand the question-a!

[Romario]

Сообщение от dedulya37

do not understand the question-a!

I saw that one of those you give a man a link to the site antique shop, located opposite the well-TASS in Moscow, hence the question - do you have attitude? I apologize if placed in an awkward position.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Romario

which is located opposite the well-TASS in Moscow

In this store I found a job that has disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Obviously someone handed her there for sale.
Question is still open.

[ФАИв]

Romario, entertainer type Furtseva, Rostropovich

What about Furtseva do not know, but Rostropovich - entertainer - this greatly!

And do something about the rich and the poor collectors is an interesting topic.
Can for example remember Ilya Samoilovych Zilberstein. DO NOT KNOW HIS OR REFERRED TO IN THIS TOPIC. Here's a unique figure! Thanks to him and his own collections and appeared in the Moscow Museum of Private Collections in Volkhonka. No rugs traded. According to him first thing in the collection acquired in 16 years! And all my life collecting. More than twenty thousand historical documents on the history of Russian culture I. Zilberstein were returned from overseas and private collections in state funds and archives of the USSR.

[uriart]

Romario, in those years were the strongest collections of many prominent figures of the Soviet art!
We Ruslanova.
We Nik.Golovanova
Vera Dulova
We Ek.Geltser
In Utjosov L.
We Mironov and A. Menaker
In A. Gribov
WF Vishnevsky
It's all Muscovites. Piterskih know less.
About collection Rzhevsky brothers already knew when it was put on display in the Benois Wing. And this book I have.
Yes, it was much more material than it is now. Then the money was less a collector than it is today.
Still honor and praise V. Vekselberg, which bought the Forbes collection and all Russia sees this wonderful collection.
I was lucky, I was at the very first exhibition in the museums of the Kremlin (the Patriarch's Palace) where there was exhibited collection.
All collectors are obsessed with people in various degrees.
But thanks to their obsession are museums in which we have much to contemplate.
Thank collectors!
Hurray, comrades!
It is a pity that in Soviet times, so no screaming.
Then just selected the collection like F. Vishnevsky. And he rose from the ashes and collected another great collection.
This topic is endless.
And I was corrected, and many will add to my modest list of names, other names.
What Furtseva, unless it is something to collect?
've Never heard

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от FAIv

Rostropovich - entertainer - this greatly!

Now we are in the word "Variety" put some sense, we are so-called light music genre, but Estrada is also the place where performing artists, stage.
No?