Artist put Mavromatti lives to vote in the shares of his /Alien

[Vladimir]

Read here: http://nikto001.livejournal.com/392156.html

Motives Osmolovsky - partly in the preamble:

My desire gouging Tar conditionally protected (and not without justifiable
criticism), former comrade-in "fight." Leftists should never give up
his friends (even the former) at the mercy of the tabloids. Besides
same ryadyascheysya in clothes "leftism". Any even misguided comrades.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem

So all proschityvaemo and this freak again rode on his neck that, against which he spoke!

And who is "ugly"?

Added after 2 minutes
Vladimir, but the Tar actually wrote a dirty little article a la MC 90.

[Vladimir]

This article-related, art-emotion. Who knows what motives ... The essence of the claims - contact details, collated, and not about the wine-dominoes. ZOdno deal with real problems in the electric chair to sit, and another thing - the computer. Well they are 100 years old knows each other, themselves sorted out.

I do not think it will rise much discussion. The fact that the striking process in the current situation is really a big deficit. And somehow destabilize the situation in the arts, radicalize it, everything does not work.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Vladimir

The essence of the claims - contact details, collated, and not about the wine-dominoes.

Agreed.
She still had yet to write the price of wine in Sofia, in vain she restrained herself, would have been even culinary travel obzorchik such.

[Vladimir]

Contrary, I prefer paper-emotions.
If this touches, the man because he has all the texture of excavated.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Vladimir

I do not think it will rise much discussion. The fact that the striking process in the current situation is really a big deficit. And somehow destabilize the situation in the arts, radicalize it, everything does not work.

 Vladimir, which means "to destabilize the situation in the arts, radicalize it? What is it? Who is trying to do? Why is this done? And I repeat the question:

Сообщение от Tiutchev

What kind of animal is - radical artists?

Who knows?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

What kind of animal is - radical artists?



Who knows?

The answer turns pathetic.
Perhaps someone who is ready to write new blood regulations.
And not on the keyboard.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Tiutchev

which means "to destabilize the situation in the arts, radicalize it?
What is this?

come up with something good, chtobry traditional optics shuddered.
To lightning proshibla as 100 years ago.
To even question did not arise, now or not.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Vladimir

A pathetic obtained. Perhaps someone who is ready to write new blood regulations. And not on the keyboard.

What is the name of the radical artist who in reality, not in the show-performances, knowingly sacrificed his life as a result of defending their beliefs (ideas, views)?

[Vladimir]

Here nudzhno clarify the issue. Who do you mean? Those who had been brought to suicide? Or representatives of "degenerate art", harried by the authorities? Or those who were sent into exile? Which format of the event we have in mind? Because in the broad sense of any good artist, no flyweight, the man ahead of their time paying with their lives for their ideas. Among the brightest people in general are not a lot of longevity.

Added after 52 minutes
The blog of Andrei Kovalev - a reference to an article by another author about Mavromati and community response (including a group of war): http://kovalev-org.livejournal.com/199214.html

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Vladimir

Among the brightest people in general are not many long-lived.

Not many, but there: Matisse and Dali lived to 84, and Claude Monet - to 86, and Picasso at all to 91 years.