Mitka, a stop on a 25-year anniversary. The exhibition in St. Petersburg

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от artcol

judging by izerpiku fabosch, there is a painting of some sort.

Y fabosch Ana avatar fragment from Yashka, but even so it is an independent artist, it think it is already "recruited" to themselves Mitka.

[Игорь Гурьев]

[QUOTE="Cyril Syzransky; 1366821]You have to answer these questions, unfortunately, can not[/QUOTE]

Q: I want to see, when they ask in such a snobbish distaste-tone?

[size="1"]Added after 2 minutes[/size]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky; 1366821"

have something of Mitki learned not as artists, Mr.

Of course.
In the 1986/87 year it was forgivable, while in Paris and first learned of their existence.

I was, in fact, their paintings never interested in as such - but only as one of their activities.

This life-giving group.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I'm just asking questions to people who, in my opinion, unlike me understand something in these Mitka.

Cyril, you can address your questions to me. At least willing to try to answer them.
I'll try to start somewhere. Of course, Mitka - a subculture. Your business, do you like it or not, it is and the advantages (to which I would mention, first of all, a very deep lining the typical type of national character, some of the national folk component, referring to Leskov, a minstrel, to the laughter of ancient culture, nonaggressive, humane orientation) but also disadvantages (some amorphous, unexpressed concept). But one must admit that this subculture has acquired opredlelennuyu popularity, as evidenced, in particular regular reprint Shinkareva as well as compilations Mitkovskaya prose. In fact Shinkarev (creator of ideology Mitki) has undeniable talent. Its difficult to call a writer in the traditional sense of the word. But in his "Mitka" and "Popuase from Honduras," he creates a very attractive and contagious world that art is very persuasive.
With regard to fine art, here the picture is not very simple. Mitka is not some kind of stylistic unity, although, of course, is something the average thing that unites them. But that's just that the average and not very interesting. Interesting personality. Among them I would single out three: Again Shinkareva, Yashka and Florensky.
With a solid running Shinkareva Swiss gallery Bishofsberger. And he is now working very hard to buy. Florensky increasingly involved in projects Gelman. Of course, there are other interesting artists: Victor Tikhomirov (he is a director, writer, journalist), Golubev, Dmitry Shagin, Kuznetsov, Filippov, grief, Kuzmin, Semichev, Mitin, and others from the younger generation I note Ira Vasilyev. It has now reached a good level.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I faboscha on avatar fragment from Yashka, and this is still an independent artist, it think it is already "recruited" to themselves Mitka.

Yashka, indeed, over the main body of Mitki about 10 years. He always kept apart, even within Mitkov. Yashka Mitki invited me to the very beginning of its activities, and later he participated in all their exhibitions, promotions, etc. Yes, he has already had its own identity before I knew Mitka, but I must say that the formation of Yashka-artist, this medium has considerable influence, as indeed, and vice versa.
Now more photos from the show
1 - exposition of the Fathers
2 - Arefiev
3 - Vladimir Shagin
4 - Vasmi
5 - Schwarz
6, 7 - Dmitry Shagin
8 - Yashka
9, 10 - Blue

[Кирилл Сызранский]

fabosch, with your eyes on Mitki as a subculture can not agree, although nothing is leskovskogo I have not seen it.
Aref'eva very much, Vasmi pleased to consider, but what they Mitka, huh?, But Shinkarevsky shaginsky-set I was not clear until now. Look at this painting and wonder: why do all this fuss?
"Dined" on these Mitka, as I understand, mostly writers, who wrote about them, some television journalists, cases of these films and programs. Sat on the topic, and so the torus on it sometimes go.
I have all the noise around Mitki perceive as imposed by the laughter of the hall in humorous programs on our TV: see laughing, very funny and does not need to choose two options - or people laughing at the jokes there the count fool or a fool not to understand humor count.
Choose the second option.

[artcol]

Сообщение от fabosch

8 - Yashka

9, 10 - Blue

Liked it.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от fabosch

6, 7 - Dmitry Shagin

8 - Yashka

Very good, talented raboty.Bolshoe thanks fabosch, for the report.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

fabosch, with your eyes on Mitki as a subculture can not agree, although nothing is leskovskogo I have not seen it.
Aref'eva very much, Vasmi pleased to consider, but what they Mitka, huh?, But Shinkarevsky shaginsky-set I was not clear until now. Look at this painting and wonder: why do all this fuss?
"Dined" on these Mitka, as I understand, mostly writers, who wrote about them, some television journalists, cases of these films and programs. Sat on the topic, and so the torus on it sometimes go.
I have all the noise around Mitki perceive as imposed by the laughter of the hall in humorous programs on our TV: see laughing, very funny and does not need to choose two options - or people laughing at jokes there the count fool or a fool not to understand humor count.
Choose the second option.

Well, well, Cyril, do not slander on myself. I think you do not like cats because they do not know how to cook them
You have everything in front. I will try to work on your aesthetic taste - and we will succeed!
Everything related to noise and journalists is hardly worth us with you to discuss. This is all a consequence of the very same subculture. Directly to the painting it is not relevant. And we all try to talk about it, that all turn right at humor?
A relative of painting can not agree with you. And Shinkarev and Yashka and Florensky quite a independent artists with their individual artistic world, that all fell in a heap. Junior Shagin leaves me calm. It's a splint that has a right to exist, has its fans, to which I belong.
But the painting, for example, A. Kuznetsov and I. Vasilyeva, certainly has its merits, although it may not please everyone. This is a matter of taste.
And talk about painting chohom Mitki that it no, it seems to me simply a consequence of insufficient knowledge of the subject
'll Post more pics soon

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от fabosch

Agovorit chohom Mitki about painting it in any way, it seems to me simply a consequence of insufficient knowledge of the subject

Granted, few of them know, but this is understandable - not glanced and it does not have any desire to learn more. Know how to say? In grades ... tasteless jam do not understand.

[fabosch]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

in grades ...
tasteless jam do not understand.

Wait, Cyril, now brewed tea, let the little infusion, but we'll see how delicious jam, but some - no

Here are some pictures

1 - Filippov

2 - Goryayev

3, 4, 5 - Vasilyev

6, 7 - Kuznetsov

8, 9 - Kuzmin

10 - Frontinsky

[fabosch]

Here are some pictures

1 - Batynkov

2 - Basil Florensky

3 - Kirillov

4, 5, 6 - Mitin

7, 8 - Filippov

9, 10 - Polissky