Evaluation and Attribution

[Fed]

Сообщение от Dmitry73

I would like to hear the views of other experts on the origins and authorship of the work.

On the origin of emails you, my grandmother bought in Leningrad, and authorship inscribed in the corner.

But this picture brings extra spice because of clashes of experts:
The first deputy director of the Tretyakov Gallery:
 "Let's bring expert painting of a Dane, signed by the same Lagorio. The both of 1863. The artist used the same colors in Europe. And no chemist here will not prove anything. Conduct an examination, he would say only that the language used in the dyes or their components have been adopted in the mid-nineteenth century. We are talking mainly about the forgeries of paintings of the nineteenth century. "
According to experts, Vladimir Petrov, the album "The Lion Lagorio", released by respected publishing house "White City", about thirty (!) Paintings belong not Lagorio, and Danish, German and French painters! And on this album with students, art historians, totally unsuspecting trick. If only the creators of "Catalogue of counterfeit works of art" did not occur to rummage in the archives of the European auctions and did not find complete analogues of these "Lagorio, overweening hype would have surfaced."

And suddenly you have a genuine Lagorio and it will become a reference for the examination. In the genre of black humor, take the examination at the Tretyakov Gallery, and then Vladimir Petrov.

P.S. Forgot to clarify what the disassembly-Tretyakovka navydavala "erroneous" conclusions, and "Catalog ..." pointed it out, and one of its drafters, Petrov, an expert of the Tretyakov Gallery and honestly of the errors and for themselves, became independent from the former and the Tretyakov expert.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от ANTIK

pure bullshit!
The work of the European average artist.

I think not.


Written brilliantly, in my opinion.

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от ANTIK

pure bullshit!
The work of the European average artist.

I agree that shit ...

[Dmitry73]

Good evening.
Today I tried to make a better picture, unfortunately glass is nevozmozhno.Sdelal photo autograph and inscription on the back side (3960r.i N125). The frame is the inscription in pencil: 13/20 (but it is almost not visible).
Again, the picture is in our family (in Leningrad-St Petersburg) with 1950g.Neuzheli and then forged paintings by Lev Lagorio?
I think the time was not quite appropriate, people were more honest, and prices of art have been others ...
Interestingly any opinion about the painting is valuable any information.

Добавлено через 6 минут
Pecheneg

If not difficult, justify your opinion.

[Dmitry73]

Pecheneg

If not difficult, justify your opinion.

[Dmitry73]

Wore work in the Russian Museum and one of the antique magazinov.Posle initial examination of questions about the authenticity of the work is not vozniklo.V soon going to give work to the examination in the Russian Museum.
Tell me, please, an indicative cost of the picture (if a positive examination).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Dmitry73

you tell me the approximate cost of the painting (in the presence of positive examination).

If there is evidence and taking into account

Сообщение от "Dmitry73

Oil on board 13 to 20cm.

of 10, I think.

[Dmitry73]

Cyril, thank you very much for the information.

Can you please tell how to sell the painting (an auction, antique store or the like). The work is in St. Petersburg.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Dmitry73

Can you please tell how to sell the painting (an auction, antique store or the like). The work is in St. Petersburg.

If you have a confirmation of authorship Lagorio, questions about selling this thing will not occur. And in an antique shop will be able to exhibit, but about the auction in St. Petersburg, I do not know.

[Dmitry73]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

but about auctions in St. Petersburg, I do not know anything

But about this auction did not hear anything? http://auction-ruseasons.ru/index.php