Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Evaluation and Attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=94392)

Dmitry73 17.10.2010 10:58

Evaluation and Attribution
 
Вложений: 6
Zdravstvuyte.Bolshaya please help in identifying the author and the possible cost of operation.

Oil on board 13 on 20sm.Podpis in the lower right uglu.Rabota acquired in 1950g.v g.Leningrade.Prinoshu apologize for the poor quality photo (work under glass). I would be grateful for any information.

sergejnowo 17.10.2010 11:58

signed as Lagorio (Leo Feliksovich)

Miniature painting to judge from the monitor is not easy.

Maybe someone from the specialists on this artist will tell.

Fed 17.10.2010 12:02

Somehow I am skeptical of such "rustic" Questions for a shopping site, like-"Oh, shozh is it?". When immediately clear that this is a very expensive artist Lagorio Lev.

   This simplicity suggests the suspicion of a possible manipulation. Especially with the exact, where the work is purchased.
 What exactly can consist of manipulation, not sure.
But do not think it's a coup. Especially do not think so after reading the opinions of renowned experts from the Hermitage in St. Petersburg on the availability of graduates of the Academy, where production of various artists.

Do not want anything bad to say about your picture, but a devious probing I do not like.

Dmitry73 17.10.2010 12:32

In the picture (the frame) has a plaque with an inscription indicating goda.Kartina was donated by my grandmother to my grandfather in 1950.

Konstantin 17.10.2010 12:51

Цитата:

1. Author.
2. Material and equipment manufacturing (oil on canvas, paper, pastels, watercolors, lithographs, oil, pencil, etc.).
3. Size (horizontal x vertical for painting).
4. Date (1899 /early., Mid-twentieth century. Etc.).
5. Captions, labels, stamps, birochki (if any - need photos).
6. State (breaks, debris, scrapes).
7. Expert opinion (if available) - the organization + name experts.
8. High-quality photograph of the picture, the back of the painting, photo captions (if any).
9. Origin of the picture.
10. Any other information useful for the attribution of the picture.
No need to provide information on the pieces, sfotkayte and shows. But without high-quality photograph of the painting is no normal response will be.

Игорь Гурьев 17.10.2010 13:00

Clouds is quite similar to the sky in the painting "View of St. Petersburg moonlit night" in 1875, but the picture seems written later.

Generally taken great; me somewhat confused cracelures, something I do not remember them in the pictures Lagorio; painting technique he respected and wait where you have everything dries out.

Here, of course, one could argue that the sketch was written in one session, then cracked.
Maybe so.

Generally speaking, in my opinion, Lagorio wrote several drier, always pulling the line, and indeterminate spots to write - I do not remember.

Amateur 17.10.2010 18:57

A ship something in the background - as if torpedoed and sank ...

sergejnowo 17.10.2010 19:04

Цитата:

Сообщение от Amateur (Сообщение 1334361)
A ship something in the background - as if torpedoed and sinks ...

and here and there :D

This is the captain abruptly pulled the handbrake on himself.
:D

ANTIK 17.10.2010 19:49

Pure bullshit!
The work of the European average artist.

Dmitry73 17.10.2010 21:08

Many thanks for mneniya.Nesmotrya made on categorical judgments distinguished ANTIKa in the near future will try to put better foto.Hotelos to hear the views of other experts on the origins and authorship raboty.Trebuetsya whether expert or opinion ANTIKa absolutely verno.I another issue (for common Development): In what year did the Soviet Union could appear fake works of this artist?


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 02:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot