I propose to discuss a law on the import and export

[artcol]

Сообщение от Meister

you in my not discussing it ... buyers and sellers - this is one side that is just interested in changing the situation ... and still have a private interest of the State (customs, Ministry of Culture), which could well not interested in changing the law because they feed from this ... on the contrary, they would have even more to tighten the screws, so that more could ask ...

That's what, and speech. On the one hand - the private interest of market participants, and with another - officials (which is not always mb concluded in money, but always maintaining the status quo).
That is why I asked at the beginning - a fact that some do not like the law, what items? Can do - the whole law is bad and not adequate? And what should be a new law to fit the realities of time? Is it at all? And as it does not infringe on private and corporate and other interests of the bureaucracy, so they gave the green light?

[Allena]

Сообщение от Meister

is a special interest in the state (Customs, Ministry of Culture), which is by no means interested in changing the law because they feed from this

I'm not sure ... Officials are human, and not all of them bought-overbought (Well, purely in the abstract) So, I think that if arranged among them a survey on the need to change the law of the transparency and consistency, many would agree. Lawlessness is obviously beneficial to small and large intermediaries, which is convenient to fish in troubled waters.

[Art Consulting]

fross,
Everywhere in the world, including us, thank God, to develop or amend legislation attracted community profile, because, just for this community and change the law. You propose to participate in the construction of the house where you live, and not halturku podkidyvayut. It completely voluntary, you do not want no part, if now you all happy in this life. And baseless ban on the export and almost no working procedures for temporary export (for individuals), and the term acquisitive prescription, bloated so that it becomes totally meaningless. At the moment, the development of all these documents, instructed the Higher School of Economics, to discuss the first two rules of the environment, almost no one came, although they tried to initiate a discussion, then I asked for permission to place documents on the forum. If you do not take the initiative, regulations will be without you. If everyone is happy with only one, in fact, sectoral laws, well let it be as it is. But I am sure that this is not quite right you can and should manage the situation themselves, rather than complain about the imperfection of the legislation and the Ministry of Culture, etc. ... Sitting there are the same people and they tend to stew in its pot, and in their community, and each of his pots thinks everything is still to take place beyond his control.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]
Allena,
Now we have a unique situation, written documents handed over to the state bodies Graduate School of Economics, to harmonize and adjust from there they will go directly to the Government for approval. And the Graduate School wants to discuss them with the community if the community deems it possible. It's simple, and there is the slightest intrigue :-) I can organize all interested parties, after discussion at the forum, a round table in high school, they will be only too glad.


You decide you need it or not.

[fross]

Сообщение от Art Consulting

fross,
Everywhere in the world, including us, thank God, to develop or amend legislation attracted community profile, because, just for this community and change the law. You propose to participate in the construction of the house where you live, and not halturku podkidyvayut. It completely voluntary, you do not want no part, if now you all happy in this life.

Not satisfied with everything, but a lot. In particular, I am not satisfied with the attempt to issue an invitation to "speak on the topic" for "the real opportunity to influence" on changes in legislation. I am very likable this forum and I do not think it is a good place for PR shares of commercial firms.

[Евгений]

Art Consulting, Main: abolish VAT and all taxes on imports and vyvoz.Ubrat restrictions on age, 50,100 years, etc. Respect the right of private ownership of antiques.
Should be based on a law that already exists in the EU
not need to reinvent the wheel ...
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...p;postcount=14

[Meister]

Сообщение от Art Consulting

I can organize all interested parties, after discussion at the forum, a round table in high school

I would even just to talk about it ... for all it will be useful.

Сообщение от Eugene

Art Consulting, Main: abolish VAT and all taxes on imports and vyvoz.Ubrat restrictions on age, 50,100 years, etc. Respect the right of private ownership of antiques.
Should be based on a law that already exists in the EU,

Naah, you can not do ... all evacuated ...

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Meister

so can not ... do all evacuated ...

Are you a Communist? We have already tried this, when the Bolsheviks cars exported from the Hermitage paintings in the U.S. .. and the common people could not sell even a commission store ..

[fross]

Сообщение от Meister

and I would even just to talk about it ... for all it will be useful.
Naah, it's no ... in general all evacuated...

And what else is left? And the fact that there is still a lot of sense to take out? In a large sense, concerned a person the law would long ago have changed.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от fross

And what else is left?

A lot ...

[Meister]

Сообщение от Eugene

Note from Meister
so ... can not do all evacuated ...

Are you a Communist??

logic on the verge of fantasy ...

Сообщение от fross

And what else is left? And the fact that there is still a lot of sense to take out? In a large sense, concerned a person the law would long ago have changed.

mitigate the need to train law, but without a rabid scream "cancel everything, everything possible, all free," and then nothing good will come of it. I'm for free import-export, but for the thoughtful. And in general, change of law must be coupled with a general change in control art market.