Auction of "The Age" in Kiev, May 15, 2010

[artcol]

Originally Posted by VYACHESLAV

When you start 5000 sold for 7000

Not bad.
This is where many Roitburd: http://www.ukrainianart.com/index.ph...artists_id=358
Self-portrait: http://www.ukrainianart.com/index.ph...&image_id=4595
Yushchenko and Tymoshenko: http://www.ukrainianart.com/index.ph...&image_id=4610 (there is a whole series, in general, not bad)

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Originally Posted by SAH

In the picture I think shows a certain place down to the sixteenth ul.Babushkina station B. Fontana (Gold Coast)

I'm not a big fan Roitburd, but I must admit I liked the picture.
But in this picture, the truth of another author, shows the beginning of descent.

[Самвел]

Originally Posted by Vyacheslav

The starting 5000 sold for 7000

Honestly, I never doubted for sale, I was wondering how many steps he will do.

Added after 9 minutes

Originally Posted by Vyacheslav

Here in this picture, the truth of another author, shows the beginning of descent

What reminds Theophile Frayerman.

[SAH]

Originally Posted by Vyacheslav

Here in this picture, the truth of another author

I can not figure out Who is?, Like Filatov may Vlasov?

[Halavk]

Two of Tsvetkova startup 7000 sold for 10000.Interesno, growth rates, a trend or a coincidence?

[Самвел]

Originally Posted by Halavk

Interestingly, growth rates, a trend or a coincidence

I think neither one thing nor the other. Tsvetkova many on the market, it recently in the auction holder, the prices were high before the crisis, and someone working with this material. In principle, it should be that-be artist engaged professionally. Artists who no one involved is very unusual rise in price, and the markups below are prodany.chto respect of the works themselves, it just, well, let's say, I was not impressed, and $ 10000 is too much.

[SAH]

Originally Posted by Halavk

Interestingly, growth rates, a trend or a coincidence?

At the "Golden Section" in the evaluation 9000 and the start was less than I believe 20-25%work Tsvetkova 49 * 59sm oil on canvas (Beautiful), went for 12000 (sort of went from Kiev to an eastern Ukrainian city of) the other three are not sold. I think today it is difficult to talk about trends rather possible to ascertain the facts.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Samvel

I think neither one thing nor the other. Tsvetkova many on the market, it recently in the auction holder, the prices were high before the crisis, and someone working with this material. In principle, it should be that-be artist engaged professionally. Artists who no one involved is very unusual rise in price, and the markups below are prodany.chto respect of the works themselves, it just, well, let's say, I was not impressed, and $ 10000, it is too much.

The second work is not bad, but still an artist with a name. And what, for sale for 10,000 now - this event?

[Самвел]

Originally Posted by artcol

Well, selling over 10,000 now - this event?

Oh why? I just think that the price is artificial, does not match, or if you say more correctly, the auction. After the auction, it is the art market, no auction, no market, ie prices. The auction is, in turn, can both raise the price for the artist, and deleted smrotrya who works with the material. Flowers, not bad, either, but the price is high, very much so.

[SAH]

Originally Posted by Samvel

After the auction, it is the art market, without the auction, there is no market, ie prices

Not exactly, the auction is one of the mechanisms on the market. As for Tsvetkova her general likes to talk about is the collectors of this artist, if the work is like that can buy.