The picture was not going to give the owner

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

You are well znaete.chto Customs poshina vvozimova depends on the price of goods, even the temporary importation of goods and as n \\ x, and can be exported as n \\ x then one value.

No, I do not know anything about the "fees" for imported cultural values.
Nobody pays immunized imported into Russia.
You do not know different?
And where does n /s or m /s?
Something you just namudrili, sorry.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Eugene

Vyacheslav, We are not lawyers with you, just wish the collector from Belgium udachi.Pravo private property should all respect, including the museum workers.

 You write about a lawyer in the domestic ponimanii.Na really lawyers (and doctors) have spetsializatsiyu.Moya specialization is not related to such matters and still want to draw attention here on some points
1.Gr.Pevzner with the picture were Customs formalnosti.Soglasites that this would not have happened if the customs declaration was not completed correctly.
 2.Kartina is not a commodity - it is clearly recorded.
3.Kartina passes the examination. Ten days passed and Pevzner charged with smuggling.
4.Po law accusation is brought after an investigation at the request or on recorded facts of the violation. In this case, the conditions of entry outlined in the declaration. That's where these ten days.

According to the law, investigations are conducted with the participation of all defendants as witnesses in the presence of advokata.I only then later charged.

 Lawyer collector Anna Stavitskaya considers these charges unfounded: "Pevzner could declare now only in the regime of temporary importation. He could not point to any author, nor the cost of painting, because he did not know them before the examination in the Russian Museum. If he did, then it would be contraband "- explains the defender.
 Strange but all these accusations are so vehemently rejects the lawyer are a consequence of major violations - fixed intention or attempted sale. Here's what should challenge the lawyers. If they will fight, everything will return to their seats.
What about perspektivah.Esli the prosecution will present in court even the slightest credible evidence of intent of sale, paintings, Mr. Pevsner not seen.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Many Western import picture in picture of the RF on the temporary admission and then, after the show, or even Saloon (and such examples have even set aside the things buyers still exports from Russia, and only then they draw up the deal and import in Russia or by proxy, there are options ) calmly take out their own.

[Veronic]

By the way, the law in this situation is absolutely not on the side of the Belgian collector. Generally, in this case we obtain two paintings. One (who moved) by an unknown author, and the second (which is exported) Bryullov, and here the law prohibits the export of cultural goods, or am I mistaken? In this situation it would be difficult to prove that it is not, even pictures will not help. I remember back in Soviet times it was possible to bring through customs one product, but under the Declaration to introduce similar.

In this situation we can assume malice. If the picture was not Bryullov, so there could be skipped, as well .... Hardly.

Eugene, keep abreast of the process. I wonder what it would be.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Veronic

or I am wrong?

Sadly mistaken.
He imported n.h for examination and brought to n.h.
Her're not signed in process ... That is, nobody here is not fault of word.
 All the prosecution was trying to sell. But attribution is, as a pretext for sale.
Violation of the rules of movement of cultural property not even mentioned.

[mihailovoh]

Cyril Syzransky,
If there is a hint in his actions. That will sell-business. You have to pay. but here vozniknit question that the import and for what purpose? You yourself pishete.chto goal vystavka.vyvoz.vvoz again novoedeklarirovanie-purpose personal use (. but when you send more 300dol pay uniquely)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

If there is a hint in his actions. That will sell-business. You have to pay. a (. but when you send more 300dol pay uniquely)

It's hard to catch your idea.
What "an allusion to his actions? Where a hint? Who is this "hint" will pick up? Where? And the airport at the border?
And this "here vozniknit question that the import and for what purpose" ... There is also a declaration, there is every indication ...
No, I do not understand all of you together, why "300 dollars."? What is "You yourself pishete.chto goal vystavka.vyvoz.vvoz again novoedeklarirovanie-purpose personal use"?

[mihailovoh]

Cyril Syzransky,
Simply net.Esli vvvoz with Commercial tselyu.to pay duty. even fizlitsom.Esli arrested and came to suda.znachit is an indication of commercial use.
Then the question arises. That the import and as declared

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

If you were arrested and came to suda.znachit is an indication of commercial use.

While nothing really know.

Added after 44 seconds

Сообщение от mihailovoh

The question then arises. That the import and as declared

But know this-entry time for the examination.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от mihailovoh

To put it there.

Well you envy ...

[ФАИв]

Сообщение от Veronic

Incidentally, the law in this situation is absolutely not on the side of the Belgian collector. Generally, in this case we obtain two paintings. One (who moved) by an unknown author, and the second (which is exported) Bryullov, and here the law prohibits the export of cultural goods, or am I mistaken? In this situation it would be difficult to prove that it is not, even pictures will not help.
Eugene, keep abreast of the process. I wonder what it will end.

First, if the picture in the Temporary Importation and framed correctly, then at least Andrei Rublev, though Shishkin, though Vangog, it does not matter you can take on it and temporary.

In this case - I agree with Vyacheslav - very smell zakazuhoy, since - the estimated charges - intent to sell, what with the temporarily imported goods are not allowed to do. But I - that are interested, as I understood authorities say - wanted to sell Brullov, and concluded that it is Bryullov? And in general, to prove intent in a court case is complicated. Such cases in the courts, usually falling apart)). They excite a very different purpose, not to bring to trial and to exert pressure.

To become - is not only our method. Recall the 2004 "Torkviniya and Lucretia" by Rubens. So the Germans have driven the owner of the full program! to select a picture, Schroeder even Putin complained.

Links
http://www.taday.ru/text/49325.html
http://www.izvestia.ru/culture/article203348/