Vasilkovsky

[олег назаров]

Сообщение от Mimoprohodil

This examination is dated April 1

April 1 joke of course can and should be, BUT MUST BE THE BORDER!

[uriart]

Yes, this is the reason!
Against the first of April is no arguing!

[Дилетант]

Again - "Going through the old pages" ...

Сообщение от uriart; 743071"

I'm interested to hear from forum participants about the authorship of this work.
Photos and a copy of the examination is attached.
Please do not hesitate to speak of all the expressions!

Of course the size of the photos will not play in my favor, but still!
Thumbnails
             
__________________

Сообщение от Mister-y; 743161"

painting a very low level, and the signature itself, take a look.

Signature looks really bad. (Although in the same meeting of the Kharkov Museum Vasilkovskaja many authentic works, is not signed by the author. And in Ukraine NMA has similar pattern). So troubling is not so much questionable signature (and later vpendyurit could, for the greater reliability), and the absence of any copyright markings characteristic of the unsigned works of the master (№ on the front or the back, personal print Vasilkovskaja etc).
The very same job - version of the painting "Spring. Poltava," is widely known to reproduce in the pre-revolutionary post card (Ed. ASC. O-va, "Granberg," in Stockholm). As to the authenticity, I would not have been so categorical. And in Kiev, and Kharkov - in museums, of course - are stored rather carelessly (okay, okay, "free") made by copyrights options. Although a lot of fake Vasilkovskaja ...
Sorry for the attention Amateur (Catilina).

[uriart]

Amateur, since you touched on this topic , so to say.
The work that I vosproshal , I push through , at what is unabashedly , representatives aukts.doma "Magnum Ars ."
I also was not hard a target , as they say !
I invited them to make chemical analysis of the paint layer at Moscow .
And after a chemical analysis , they continued to assure that the work is authentic.
But my intelligence reported that the chemical analysis showed the modern paint.
Only after my letter in which I told them that I think about them in this situation , madam, with whom I corresponded named Tatiana , making an acid bomb and showing his wounded pride stopped correspondence.
That's it !
And this is the auction house !

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от uriart; 2096401"

the work that I vosproshal , I push through , at what is unabashedly , representatives aukts.doma "Magnum Ars ".

Uriart, sure: these stories - the sea overflowing ! In your case, knowledge of the subject , persistence, and received not officially <! - ~ 1 ~ -> info (" But intelligence reported accurately , monument , couples, couples , couples , couples ...") helped to avoid losses. Well , except for loss of loss of faith in the decency of individual employees some auction houses ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Yes, the comparison with the original from the Literary Museum denies this picture all the bases.


However, without compare, it is not impressive, it is clear that a copy of the diligent, not more.

And the author does not, of course.

[uriart]

Guriev, Igor, p bumazhechka Peter's as well?

Or is not he but someone under him?

[SAH]

uriart, to which so much passion (<! - ~ 1 ~ ->) does not fit the object move on ....

Сообщение от dabbler

such stories - the sea
overflowing!

Amateur, really enjoyed your

Сообщение от dabbler

pam-param, param, param, param ...

<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от uriart; 2096531"

and Peter's bumazhechka what ?

First, it is proved that it is Petrov.
Second, everyone can make mistakes, and Comrade . Petrov, and Comrade . Guriev , including (and I have no comrade before preklonyalova . Petrov , and he means it , as I am I ).

It is therefore necessary to have more than one paper , " expertise " , and two , preferably three.

Independent of each other.

Anyone who has faced serioznymi things do not always have an opinion from one fellow , a minimum of three , at best , and from five.

It's elementary.

And when someone razschityvaet in the opinion of one "authority" , it can be very seriozno prokolotstsa , such as blunt Vekselberg.

However, losing a lemon - this is nonsense .

Just thought of this fellow , what is " aftaritety ."

He naively did not know that it is necessary to interview a dozen people most respected .
One confirms another grin , and the third says "no."

It is possible that I reveal the most important secrets of the art business .

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 2097321"

First of all, it is proved that it is Petrov.
Second, everyone can make mistakes, and Comrade . Petrov, and Comrade . Guriev , including (and I have no comrade before preklonyalova . Petrov , and he means it , as I am I ).

And that's - agree !
( Except, perhaps , § 1 . I do not think "Magnum" would be based on a false conclusion. Not enemies , they currently ...)