Galleries enough, but where art to fill them?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Vladimir

In other words, residents of Moscow and other cities in Russia have not yet had the pleasure to live like human beings contemplate the work of the British avant-garde.

A mozht and for the better? "(All that is not ...)

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

That is true. Of course, mixed up with Larry Gagosyanom. Sorry.

All understood. No problem. Gagosian exhibition brought in Barvikha Luxury Village (not seen) and "Red October" (see, there are pictures). Hirst in "Red October" was not, but without the exhibition was outstanding: Pollock, de Kooning, Gorky - and all the work you could buy ...

[SAH]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And here I am with you do not agree.

I do not understand with what exactly you do not agree.

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Iskussto-"art"-Retail! Can we call a work of art, which is done by the hands of hired workers on the stolen idea and is extremely easy to repeat (replicate, produce)? Hands of the same workers, for example?

Your question, my answer is possible. Contradictions for me, no. Black Square is also possible and extremely easy to repeat (replicate, produce)? Hands of the same workers, for example? " As for the idea is stolen as you can imagine is very controversial and may require the intervention of the prosecutor's office (God forbid) If you are about Hirst is to read my posts you can see I do not remember how he called. about the exhibition in Kiev, the exhibition goes until September, the queue is no, entry is free. Me he Hirst is not necessary, are not particularly enthusiastic, but in my opinion is relevant. The world is such rot, unfortunately.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

I am glad that NATA NOVA wrote that I tried myself to say last week about the hands unknown to me electricians, mehannikov and carpenters. It is true, then it somehow in these ideas have not permeated.


Black box again impossible, since it was first. And, besides, "Square" is not monochrome, and has a smooth texture, as drawings of some "great" Aussie Rules "artists" in 50-80 years of 20 century.

British journalist, of course, not an expert in contemporary art (like myself). But how long will be able to deceive the people, by such masterpieces as otfotoshoplennye photo wallpaper? (see the topic about Sovrem. Amer. art).
Let these people and rich. No queues at the following shows: - figure. Turner (in the Pushkin Museum) last fall, much people crowd. Although Turner - this is not Shishkin and Aivazovsky - known, familiar and understandable to the masses artists.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

understandable to the masses artists.

Lord, "the masses"! have not heard of this phrase, as a breath of good old shovel. Or socks? : D

[eva777]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

because in Russia is full nepugannyh rich idiots willing to buy all

Although one example is found in?

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от SAH

probably at the forum there are people who control the worldwide artbiznes, and may opredilit where fresh and where the stale image.

    Perhaps this is so, what is very much doubt it, but do not you think that to ask the opinion "of people who control the worldwide art-business", it would be extremely naive. Understanding the art, ie something without which it is impossible now collecting and businesses in this area, comes rather from personal experience, rather than on the advice of others. Although, of course, is not superfluous to seek the views of professionals.
      Certainly, on this forum are professionals, as artists, and artdilery. But why would not you assume that I am one of them? I certainly do not control the market artbiznesa on a global scale, but quite a long time and is active in its presence. My smaller scale, but that is, that is.
  P.S. His opinion and impose on anyone willing to listen to others forumchan. You see, in the art recognize only the authority of a connoisseur of the object. The views of the same dealers, as a rule, not objective their own interests. I tell you, as a professional.

[Jasmin]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

in the art recognize only the authority of a connoisseur of the object.

And who is the authority for you, say, painting?

[Tamila]

Сообщение от Vladimir

banter - this is the main technique Clarkson, the basis of the genre. But his expertise in this matter philistine. Logic: saw - did not understand - all around are fools.

Okay. In general, it notes all the same. But I like it, he writes with humor and stebetsya "over all, including and above the British.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Jasmin

And who is the authority for you, say, painting?

You mean the experts?