On the strange influence on the art

[Amateur]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Or maybe reading. Burliuk was very educated, he studied except Russia, and even in Munich, Paris ...

Dear Cyril Syzransky, I completely do not deny that possibility, just seriously doubt it. It would be interesting is to compare and timing. Rutherford's work was published in April 1911 And in what month in 1911 Burliuk painted? .. I do not know. Generally, I would like to know more about the film "Atom" on the Internet I could not find anything.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Amateur

Actually, I would like to know more about the film "Atom" on the Internet I could not find anything.

Give You Cyril Syzran to return home from Moscow. Maybe then, and find in their books.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Amateur, yes, the Internet is not a panacea, he now became convinced, once outside the cabinet. Many just do not exist or are difficult to find, such as articles in the old publications. No library is indispensable.
I will see do not forget, I worked early Burliuk, Russia period.

[mezon]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Amateur, yes, the Internet is not a panacea, he now became convinced, once outside the cabinet. Many just do not exist or are difficult to find, such as articles in the old publications. No library is indispensable.
I will see do not forget, I worked early Burliuk, Russia period.

Well if you find this picture - it would be interesting to see. Only Rutherford planetary model of atom is offered as an explanation of their experiments, ie He is not a guess, but a logical result of experiments. Images of the atom can not be, because in fact, a single atom does not radiate while in the rest and only aroused him, hitting him to electron, we can see the flash, with a particular wavelength, the color green, or say, the next moment. red like a spark vnochi - and silence ... Only a whole bunch of matter at a specific temperature has a certain range of radiation, savokupnost different wavelengths, characteristic for this substance. Invisibility of the atom at rest - is the property of the model proposed by Niels Bohr.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 18 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от K-Maler

I see that Aristotle is not enough, then Heidegger: "... in the world is not about playing any single determinate being, but about playing the universal essence of things."

Neither Aristotle, nor Haydengera nor Leonardo .... not enough to play the universal essence of things and in this sense we are all artisans, compared with the Creator, but when we otkazyvaemya from repeating forms, patterns of data over we become creators themselves.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от mezon

things and in this respect, we are all artisans, as compared with the Creator, but when we otkazyvaemya from repeating forms, patterns of data over we become creators themselves.

Understand the Creator as a template - this is almost a religious point of view ... Question is about how not to do horrible ... By the way, the scientists are also applicable.

[mezon]

Сообщение от K-Maler

To understand the Creator as a template - this is almost a religious point of view ... Question is about how not to do horrible ... By the way, the scientists are also applicable.

  By and large you have me there is no disagreement. No desire to cling to the words and walk in a circle. If you are an interesting article has shown me that already dostatochno.Spasibo for dialogue. Go in the subject. I'm going to throw something else interesnenkoe

[Buscador]

Сообщение от mezon

Continuing the theme of the relationship of physics and art was revealed to me more depth of their relationship. I hope it will also help you in understanding the interaction of classical, contemporary art and man.

Eco, where you skidded! This would be a little more chemistry, and it would have gone faster ... The more that artists love chemical, creating, rubbing, different substances. And if we "took on his chest," that could open up even more profound connection ... The core of any profession to an professionalism and talent! Everything Else - companion, doping, so to speak. And each needs its own ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от mezon

a revolution in art influenced the evolution

Gentlemen And you can have without revolutions? Evolution - a natural thing, a revolution - far-fetched ...

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от mezon

no desire to cling to the words and walk in a circle.

Revolutions do not, but ... as you wish, go out from the circle, if you're in contemporary art all to such an extent clearly.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Amateur

Rutherford's work was published in April 1911 And in what month in 1911 Burliuk painted?

And it really dating? Burliuk because from time to time, dated the later paintings in earlier years.

[mezon]

Сообщение от Buscador

Quote:
Note from mezon
Continuing the theme of the relationship of physics and art was revealed to me more depth of their relationship. I hope it will also help you in understanding the interaction of classical, contemporary art and people.

Eco, where you skidded! This would be a little more chemistry, and it would have gone faster ... The more that artists love chemical, creating, rubbing, different substances. And if we "took on his chest," that could open up even more profound connection ... The core of any profession to an professionalism and talent! Everything Else - companion, doping, so to speak. And each needs its own ...

Quote:
Note from mezon
a revolution in art influenced the evolution

Gentlemen And you can have without revolutions? Evolution - a natural thing, a revolution - far-fetched ...

    C call for the lifting of revolutions you missed at least a hundred years: the revolution of 17, already took place and about the same time held a revolution in painting. C the same success can throw a slogan on the nonuse of chemistry, but it seems no chemistry in the painting can not get by, especially those who "takes her to his chest."