N.N.Dubovskoy, "Moonlight on the sea." Please attribution of the painting

[redbor]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Second, presented at the marina signature clearly late and hardly any author.

Here I agree <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[NatalyCzarnowski]

Thank you all for your answers.
I'm doing the examination to confirm the authorship and authenticity, not to establish.
In authorship I'm sure because I know the history of these paintings before handing them to me.
Just need a piece of paper.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

Why oil painting under glass?

Well, not exactly under the glass I put.
so it was a long time ago.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NatalyCzarnowski

I know the history of these paintings before handing them to me.

As you may know before buying these paintings in 1981?
Do not tell people.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[NatalyCzarnowski]

And then, we are all well aware that a picture has already passed the examination before selling it through a pawnshop , the receipt even have a record of what work is old . I want to thank everyone for participating in the discussion. Let's wait for an expert opinion . If you have questions or suggestions , ask the PM.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NatalyCzarnowski

we are all well aware that a picture has already passed the examination before selling it through a pawnshop, the receipt even have a record of what work is old.

Nonsense, do not write.

[redbor]

Сообщение от NatalyCzarnowski; 2748591 "

And then , all of us are well aware that the film has already passed the examination before selling it through a pawnshop , the receipt even have a record of what work is old .

What are you , what kind of expertise in 1981 ? When selling to the commission for the 550r <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Under what name prninesli , under such and put up for sale.
The entire examination on the label :/" Moonlight .. " n /s 19th century , b /a (no attribution ? ) , Pollution , the loss of the frame. /
A painting is real - amateur .

[mihailovoh]

NatalyCzarnowski,

Do not waste your money is not Dubovskoy.a H \\ X is not worth it.

[Борис Кон]

It is likely that this Dubovskoy is, quite in his style.

Canvas under glass, do not really visible.

Topic Starter wish to open a picture, which in any case have to do before the examination, and to lay out high-quality photos, including - the signature separately.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Boris Cohn

It is likely that this Dubovskoy is quite in his style.

Boris Cohn, you have "authority" and will soon become a "guru" is probably worth something more closely relate to its messages <! - ~ 1 ~ ->.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от U_Z

Boris Cohn, you have "authority" and will soon become a "guru" is probably worth something more closely relate to its messages <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
.

What is it?

It's okay, like: " it is his style ".
Stylish, in short, a picture.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->